Intel Core 9 273PE vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PE vs Intel Processor 300

The Intel Core 9 273PE and Intel Processor 300 are both desktop processors for Intel Socket 1700, but they occupy opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The Core 9 273PE is a 12-core, 24-thread Bartlett Lake part with a 5.70 GHz boost clock, while the Intel Processor 300 is a 2-core, 4-thread Raptor Lake-S chip with a fixed 3.90 GHz base clock and no boost capability. Benchmark data for the Core 9 273PE is extensive, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Core 9 273PE sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Intel Processor 300 sits at the 50th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, and the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores of its own. However, the Core 9 273PE has a full set of benchmark results that define its performance envelope, and these can be compared against the known capabilities of the Intel Processor 300 based on its specifications.

The Core 9 273PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31288 and a single-core score of 4417. Its Cinebench R20 results are 13140 multi-core and 1855 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3153 multi-core and 445 single-core. These scores place the Core 9 273PE at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49845. The Intel Processor 300, with its 2 cores and 4 threads, would necessarily produce far lower multi-threaded scores, though no exact figures exist in the database.

In PassMark tests, the Core 9 273PE shows strong multi-threaded performance. Its PassMark multi-thread score is 36810, and its single-thread score is 3650. The integer math score is 139410, floating point math is 107884, and extended instructions score is 24630. Data compression scores 405885, data encryption scores 22719, and random string sorting scores 45098. The physics score is 3120, and the find prime numbers score is 203. These results indicate that the Core 9 273PE is a capable performer across diverse workloads, with particularly high scores in integer math and data compression.

Comparing the two processors directly, the Core 9 273PE has six times the cores and six times the threads of the Intel Processor 300. Its boost clock of 5.70 GHz is substantially higher than the Intel Processor 300's fixed 3.90 GHz, though the Intel Processor 300 has a higher base clock of 3.90 GHz versus the Core 9 273PE's 2.30 GHz. The Core 9 273PE also has a significantly larger L3 cache at 36 MB shared, compared to 6 MB shared on the Intel Processor 300. The Core 9 273PE's L2 cache is 2 MB per core, while the Intel Processor 300 has 1.25 MB per core.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PE wins in essentially every workload category that benefits from multiple cores. Its 12 cores and 24 threads allow it to handle heavily parallel workloads with ease. The multi-threaded PassMark score of 36810 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31288 indicate strong performance in rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing. The data compression score of 405885 and integer math score of 139410 show that the Core 9 273PE also excels in productivity tasks and database workloads.

The Intel Processor 300 wins in power efficiency and low-load scenarios. Its TDP of 46 watts is lower than the Core 9 273PE's 65 watts. With only 2 cores and 4 threads, it consumes less power under load and produces less heat. Its higher base clock of 3.90 GHz means that for single-threaded tasks that do not boost, it may have a frequency advantage over the Core 9 273PE's 2.30 GHz base clock. However, the Core 9 273PE's boost clock of 5.70 GHz would likely close that gap in actual operation, as most modern workloads can utilize boost frequencies.

For users running basic office applications, web browsing, or light media consumption, the Intel Processor 300 provides adequate single-threaded performance. Its 3.90 GHz base clock is respectable for such tasks. The Core 9 273PE, with its 5.70 GHz boost clock, would also handle these tasks extremely well, but with higher power consumption. The Intel Processor 300 also has ECC memory support, a feature that is often required in entry-level server or workstation builds, though the Core 9 273PE also supports ECC memory, making both capable in that regard.

Architecture Differences

The Core 9 273PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is listed as belonging to the Core 9 generation. The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-S and belongs to the Intel Processor generation. Both processors are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, so the manufacturing process is identical.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, indicating support for hyper-threading. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads, also supporting hyper-threading. Both processors have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: the Core 9 273PE has 2 MB per core, while the Intel Processor 300 has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator, with the Core 9 273PE offering 36 MB shared versus 6 MB shared on the Intel Processor 300.

The die size of the Intel Processor 300 is listed as 163 mm². The die size of the Core 9 273PE is not recorded in the database. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 9 273PE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the memory bandwidth of the Intel Processor 300 is not recorded. Both support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ between the two. The Core 9 273PE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710. The release dates differ as well, with the Core 9 273PE releasing in 2026 and the Intel Processor 300 releasing in 2024. The part numbers are SA4QD for the Core 9 273PE and SRN3J for the Intel Processor 300.

Specification Differences

The core count is the most obvious difference: 12 cores and 24 threads for the Core 9 273PE versus 2 cores and 4 threads for the Intel Processor 300. The base clock of the Core 9 273PE is 2.30 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz. The Core 9 273PE has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 has no boost clock listed, meaning it operates at a fixed frequency.

The TDP differs, with the Core 9 273PE rated at 65 watts and the Intel Processor 300 at 46 watts. The L2 cache is 2 MB per core on the Core 9 273PE and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel Processor 300. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared on the Core 9 273PE and 6 MB shared on the Intel Processor 300. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the Core 9 273PE and not recorded for the Intel Processor 300.

ECC memory support is present on both processors, though the Intel Processor 300 does not list ECC support in its specifications. The integrated graphics differ, with UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 273PE and UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel Processor 300. The release dates are 2026 for the Core 9 273PE and 2024 for the Intel Processor 300. The launch MSRP is $549 for the Core 9 273PE and $82 for the Intel Processor 300. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they cannot be overclocked.

The die size of the Intel Processor 300 is 163 mm², while the die size of the Core 9 273PE is not recorded. Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration. Both support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both are active production parts for the desktop market segment.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of these processors?

A: The Core 9 273PE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no boost clock listed.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Core 9 273PE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Processor 300 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: The Core 9 273PE lists ECC memory support as true. The Intel Processor 300 does not list ECC memory support in its specifications.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors include?

A: The Core 9 273PE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Core 9 273PE has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 watts.

Q: When were these processors released?

A: The Core 9 273PE was released in 2026, while the Intel Processor 300 was released in 2024.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of each processor?

A: The launch MSRP is $549 for the Core 9 273PE and $82 for the Intel Processor 300.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two processors into different performance classes. The Core 9 273PE, with its 12 cores, 24 threads, 5.70 GHz boost clock, and 36 MB L3 cache, delivers high multi-threaded performance as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31288 and PassMark multi-thread score of 36810. It ranks at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49845. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 with an average score of 49796, the Intel Core i5-14600KF with 49394, the Intel Core i9-13980HX with 50398, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 with 50448. The Core 9 273PE is within 1.2% of all these rivals in average benchmark score.

The Intel Processor 300, with its 2 cores and 4 threads, 3.90 GHz fixed clock, and 6 MB L3 cache, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, which reflects the absence of recorded data rather than actual performance. The processor would be suitable for basic desktop tasks given its 46 watt TDP and 3.90 GHz base clock, but the lack of benchmark data prevents a direct quantitative comparison.

For users who need multi-threaded performance for rendering, video encoding, or heavy productivity workloads, the Core 9 273PE is the clear choice. Its benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests demonstrate strong capabilities in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. The single-thread score of 4417 in Cinebench R23 and 3650 in PassMark show that it handles lightly threaded workloads well too.

For users who prioritize low power consumption and have modest computing needs, the Intel Processor 300 offers a lower TDP of 46 watts and a higher base clock of 3.90 GHz. Its integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides basic display output, and its 2 cores and 4 threads handle everyday tasks. The 6 MB L3 cache is small but adequate for light workloads. The absence of a boost clock means consistent performance at 3.90 GHz.

The Core 9 273PE supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for reliability-sensitive builds. The Intel Processor 300 does not list ECC support. Both processors use the same Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, making platform compatibility similar. Both support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The benchmark data indicates that the Core 9 273PE is competitive with other high-end processors in its neighborhood. Its average benchmark score of 49845 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 at 49796, showing parity with that part. It is 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and 1.1% behind the Intel Core i9-13980HX. These small deltas suggest the Core 9 273PE performs in the same class as those processors.

The Intel Processor 300 has no nearest rivals listed in the database, which means no comparative benchmark data exists. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates it sits in the middle of the performance distribution, but this is based on its specifications rather than measured benchmark scores. The processors serve different markets, and the data supports the Core 9 273PE as the higher-performing option in every measured category.