Intel Core 9 273PE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database currently contains no direct head-to-head comparison results between the Intel Core 9 273PE and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the win count for each processor is zero. This absence of paired testing means a direct score-by-score comparison cannot be drawn from recorded measurements. However, the Intel Core 9 273PE has a substantial set of individual benchmark scores, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at all.

Looking at the Intel Core 9 273PE in isolation, its recorded data shows strong performance across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31288 points in multicore and 4417 points in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 13140, with a singlecore score of 1855. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3153 points multicore and 445 points singlecore. These figures indicate a processor with high throughput in rendering workloads, particularly in multicore tasks where the 12 cores and 24 threads are fully utilized.

The Passmark suite provides additional performance data for the Core 9 273PE. The multithread score is 36810, singlethread is 3650, and the overall single-thread score is also recorded as 3650. Integer math scores 139410, floating point math scores 107884, and extended instructions score 24630. Data compression scores 405885, while data encryption scores 22719. Random string sorting scores 45098, and physics scores 3120. Find prime numbers scores 203. These results show a processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads with competence, and the data compression score is particularly high, suggesting strong memory subsystem performance.

The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PE is 49845, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 with an average score of 49796, a delta of 0.1 percent, meaning the Core 9 273PE is essentially tied with that chip. The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49394, putting the Core 9 273PE 0.9 percent ahead. The Intel Core i9-13980HX scores 50398, making it 1.1 percent faster than the Core 9 273PE. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448, leading by 1.2 percent. These deltas are small, indicating the Core 9 273PE sits in a tightly contested performance band.

For the Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL, the database lists no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile is 50. This means no comparative analysis can be performed for this processor from the existing data. The lack of recorded measurements prevents any statement about its relative performance against the Core 9 273PE or any other CPU.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear disparity in available information. The Intel Core 9 273PE has a comprehensive set of benchmark results, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has none. From a data-driven perspective, the Core 9 273PE is the only processor in this comparison with measurable performance evidence. Its 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, combined with an average benchmark score of 49845, demonstrates that it is a high-performing desktop processor. The nearest rival data confirms it is within 1.2 percent of several strong competitors, including the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and the Intel Core i9-13980HX.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL, with no recorded scores, cannot be assessed for performance from the database. Its 50th percentile ranking appears to be a default value rather than a measured result, as the average benchmark score of zero confirms the absence of test data. Users seeking a processor with verified performance numbers should rely on the Core 9 273PE, as its benchmark record is extensive and places it in the top decile of all CPUs tracked.

The Core 9 273PE also has a higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz compared to 5.00 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 165HL, and a higher base clock of 2.30 GHz versus 1.40 GHz. These clock advantages, combined with the recorded benchmark scores, suggest the Core 9 273PE is the stronger choice for workloads that benefit from high per-core frequency. The Core Ultra 7 165HL has more cores, 16 versus 12, but fewer threads, 22 versus 24, which is an unusual configuration. Without benchmark data, the real-world impact of this core and thread arrangement cannot be quantified.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and use different process nodes. The Intel Core 9 273PE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation. It uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL is based on the Meteor Lake architecture, specifically the Meteor Lake-PS codename, and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1 generation. It uses a 7 nm process node, also manufactured by Intel. The smaller process node for the Ultra 7 165HL indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology, though this does not translate into recorded performance data.

The Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL has 16 cores and 22 threads. The thread count disparity suggests the Core 9 273PE uses symmetric cores with hyperthreading, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL may use a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores, where not all cores support hyperthreading. The Core 9 273PE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 165HL has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core 9 273PE has significantly higher clocks on both ends, which likely contributes to its strong single-thread benchmark scores.

Cache configurations differ between the two. The Core 9 273PE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 165HL has 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 9 273PE has a larger L3 cache, 36 MB versus 24 MB, which can benefit workloads with large working sets. The Core Ultra 7 165HL has a larger L1 cache per core, 112 KB versus 80 KB, which may improve per-core latency for certain operations.

The sockets differ as well. The Core 9 273PE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL uses Intel Socket 1851. This means they are not interchangeable in a motherboard. PCIe support also differs: the Core 9 273PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The Core 9 273PE has more PCIe lanes and a newer generation, which is advantageous for discrete GPUs and high-speed storage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has 16 cores and 22 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 9 273PE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL does not.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has a full set of Cinebench and Passmark scores. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has an average benchmark score of 49845. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no measured data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PE wins in every category where data exists. Its benchmark scores cover Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, as well as the full Passmark suite. The multicore Cinebench R23 score of 31288 indicates strong rendering performance. The singlecore Cinebench R23 score of 4417 indicates high per-core speed, supported by the 5.70 GHz boost clock. In Passmark tests, the data compression score of 405885 is particularly strong, and the multithread score of 36810 confirms broad workload capability. The 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database reinforces its position as a high-end desktop processor.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL has no recorded wins because it has no recorded benchmark scores. Its specifications show 16 cores, 22 threads, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock, but without test data, no performance advantage can be verified. The larger core count could theoretically benefit heavily threaded workloads, but the lower boost clock and smaller L3 cache, 24 MB versus 36 MB, suggest it may not match the Core 9 273PE in single-thread or cache-sensitive tasks. The 45 W TDP for the Ultra 7 165HL is lower than the 65 W TDP for the Core 9 273PE, which may indicate better power efficiency, but no efficiency benchmarks are available.

The Core 9 273PE also offers more PCIe lanes, 16 of Gen 5, versus 8 of Gen 4 for the Ultra 7 165HL. This gives the Core 9 273PE an advantage for systems with multiple expansion cards or modern NVMe drives. The integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 9 273PE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Ultra 7 165HL uses Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. The Arc graphics likely have stronger iGPU performance, but no benchmarks confirm this.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on several specification fields. The Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL has 16 cores and 22 threads. Base clocks are 2.30 GHz for the Core 9 273PE and 1.40 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. Boost clocks are 5.70 GHz and 5.00 GHz, respectively. TDP is 65 W for the Core 9 273PE and 45 W for the Core Ultra 7 165HL.

The process node is 10 nm for the Core 9 273PE and 7 nm for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. Sockets are Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 9 273PE and Intel Socket 1851 for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. The Core 9 273PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL uses Meteor Lake-PS. The Core 9 273PE belongs to the Core 9 generation, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1 generation.

L1 cache is 80 KB per core for the Core 9 273PE and 112 KB per core for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. L2 cache is 2 MB per core for both. L3 cache is 36 MB shared for the Core 9 273PE and 24 MB shared for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the Core 9 273PE, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL supports DDR5 with the note that support depends on the motherboard. Both have dual-channel memory buses with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

ECC memory support is present on the Core 9 273PE and absent on the Core Ultra 7 165HL. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core 9 273PE, and Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 for the Core 9 273PE and Arc Xe-LPG 128EU for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. The release date for the Core 9 273PE is 2026-03-08, while the Core Ultra 7 165HL was released on 2024-04-07. The launch MSRP is $549 for the Core 9 273PE and $459 for the Core Ultra 7 165HL. Both have locked multipliers and are in active production.