Intel Core 9 273PE vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clear split between the two processors, with the Intel Core 9 273PE taking 11 of the 17 recorded comparisons, while the Intel Core i5-14600 claims 6 wins. The Core 9 273PE dominates in most compute-heavy workloads, while the i5-14600 holds advantages in specific data-oriented tasks.

Starting with multi-threaded rendering performance, the Core 9 273PE leads across every Cinebench iteration. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 3153 against 3070 for the i5-14600, a 2.7% advantage. The same margin repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core (13140 vs 12794) and Cinebench R23 multi-core (31288 vs 30464). Single-core results follow the same pattern: the Core 9 273PE posts 445 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1855 in R20 single-core, and 4417 in R23 single-core, each roughly 2.7% ahead of the i5-14600's 433, 1806, and 4300 respectively.

The PassMark suite reveals where the Core 9 273PE truly pulls away. In prime number finding, it scores 203 versus 155, a massive 31% lead. Floating point math shows 107884 against 85759, a 25.8% margin. Integer math delivers 139410 versus 117078, a 19.1% advantage. Physics simulation results are similarly lopsided: 3120 versus 2330, a 33.9% gap. The multi-threaded PassMark result is closer, with the Core 9 273PE at 36810 against 35848, a 2.7% edge that mirrors the Cinebench margins.

The i5-14600 counterattacks in several PassMark workloads. Data compression favors it by 6.6%, scoring 434620 versus 405885. Data encryption shows a 9.4% lead at 25082 versus 22719. Extended instruction throughput gives it a 4.1% advantage (25674 vs 24630), and random string sorting adds another 6.1% win (48043 vs 45098). The largest i5-14600 victory comes in single-threaded PassMark testing, where it scores 4167 against 3650, a 12.4% gap. This result is notable because the Cinebench single-core tests point the other way, suggesting workload-specific behavior rather than a universal single-core advantage.

Average benchmark scores place the Core 9 273PE at 49845 overall, versus 44889 for the i5-14600. The Core 9 273PE sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the i5-14600 ranks at the 89th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core 9 273PE include the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (0.1% lower average score), the Intel Core i5-14600KF (0.9% lower), the Intel Core i9-13980HX (1.1% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (1.2% higher). For the i5-14600, the closest competition includes the Intel Core i9-12900KS (0.5% higher), AMD EPYC 4344P (0.5% higher), AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (0.7% lower), and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (1% lower).

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's 10 nm process node and socket onto Intel Socket 1700, but their internal designs diverge significantly. The Core 9 273PE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation and carries the codename Bartlett Lake. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads. The i5-14600 is a Core 14th Gen part built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, offering 14 cores and 20 threads. The i5-14600 has two more physical cores but four fewer threads, which means the Core 9 273PE relies on a higher thread count per core configuration.

Cache hierarchies show another key difference. Both chips allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, but the shared L3 cache differs: 36 MB for the Core 9 273PE versus 24 MB for the i5-14600. That 12 MB L3 advantage gives the Core 9 273PE more room for frequently accessed data. The i5-14600 has a documented die size of 257 mm², while no die size figure is recorded for the Core 9 273PE.

Memory support is identical in scope: both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and both support ECC memory. The Core 9 273PE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the i5-14600. Both run PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ slightly: the Core 9 273PE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14600 steps up to UHD Graphics 770.

Clock speeds favor the Core 9 273PE on boost, with a 5.70 GHz maximum against 5.20 GHz for the i5-14600. The i5-14600 counters with a higher base clock at 2.70 GHz versus 2.30 GHz. Both CPUs have locked multipliers, so neither supports unlocked overclocking. Both parts are marked as Active in production status, and both are desktop market segment processors. The release dates differ by more than two years: the i5-14600 launched in January 2024, while the Core 9 273PE is dated March 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PE establishes itself as the stronger choice for multi-threaded rendering and general compute workloads. Its consistent 2.7% lead across all Cinebench tests, paired with substantial wins in floating point math, integer math, prime number finding, and physics simulation, points to a processor that handles sustained computational loads with more headroom. The 33.9% physics advantage and the 31% prime number edge are the standout margins in the entire comparison. The larger 36 MB L3 cache likely contributes to these results, as does the higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

The i5-14600 wins in data manipulation tasks. Data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting all favor it, with margins between 4.1% and 9.4%. These are workloads that respond well to the extra two physical cores and the higher base clock of 2.70 GHz. The PassMark single-thread result, where the i5-14600 leads by 12.4%, indicates that some single-threaded workloads prefer its configuration despite the lower boost ceiling.

The split is not neatly categorized by core count or clock speed alone. The i5-14600 has more cores but fewer threads, and it wins in encryption and compression, while the Core 9 273PE has fewer cores but more threads and wins in math-heavy tasks. The data suggests that thread scheduling and cache capacity matter more than raw core counts for the Core 9 273PE's strongest workloads.

The Verdict

The recorded data favors the Intel Core 9 273PE for users who prioritize rendering, scientific computing, and physics simulation. Its 11 benchmark wins include every Cinebench test and the major PassMark compute categories, and its average benchmark score of 49845 is 11% higher than the i5-14600's 44889. The 90th percentile ranking versus the 89th percentile reinforces this overall edge.

The Intel Core i5-14600 remains competitive for data-oriented tasks. Its wins in compression, encryption, extended instructions, and string sorting, plus the large single-thread PassMark margin, make it a reasonable pick for workloads centered on data processing. The higher core count of 14 versus 12 does not translate into overall superiority, but it clearly helps in specific scenarios.

The Core 9 273PE carries a launch MSRP of $549, while the i5-14600 lists at $255. Both processors share the same socket, so platform compatibility is not a distinguishing factor. Users on a strict performance-per-dollar analysis will note the price difference, but the benchmark data stands on its own: the Core 9 273PE wins the majority of tests and delivers the higher average score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE boosts to 5.70 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14600 reaches 5.20 GHz.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Core 9 273PE scores 31288, which is 2.7% higher than the i5-14600's 30464.

Q: Which CPU performs better in data encryption?

A: The i5-14600 leads in PassMark data encryption with a score of 25082, a 9.4% advantage over the Core 9 273PE's 22719.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 9 273PE and the i5-14600 support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core 9 273PE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-14600 has 24 MB.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PE | Intel Core i5-14600 |

|---|---|---|

| Series | null | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 12 | 14 |

| Threads | 24 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.70 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Architecture | null | Raptor Lake |

| Generation | Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die Size | null | 257 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $549 | $255 |

| Part Number | SA4QD | SRN44 |