Intel Core 9 270H vs Intel Core i5-14500 Comparison
Intel Core 9 270H
Core i5-14500
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 9 270H vs Intel Core i5-14500
The Intel Core i5-14500 and Intel Core 9 270H are both 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake parts, yet their benchmark profiles could not be more different. The i5-14500 is a desktop processor that wins 11 of 17 head-to-head tests, while the 270H is a mobile part that takes 6 wins, including the most important multi-core stress test. The data suggests the 270H is the better choice for sustained multi-threaded workloads and single-core responsiveness, while the i5-14500 dominates in math, encryption, and compression tasks. The 270H’s 16.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is a decisive factor for heavy rendering, but the i5-14500’s 12.7% advantage in floating-point math indicates a different strength profile. Neither chip has a clear overall victory; the i5-14500’s average benchmark score is 38531 versus the 270H’s 38335, a 0.5% gap that places both at the 86th percentile of all CPUs.
The Verdict
The data splits these two processors into distinct buyer profiles. If the workload is heavily threaded and sustained — think video encoding, 3D rendering, or compiling — the Intel Core 9 270H is the pick. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18000 versus the i5-14500’s 15012 is a 16.6% margin that no other test reverses. The 270H also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core (2464 vs 2435) and single-core (347 vs 273, a 21.3% blowout), plus PassMark physics (1966 vs 1746, 11.2% ahead) and prime number finding (112 vs 106, 5.4% ahead). For anyone prioritizing raw multi-threaded rendering capability, the 270H’s data is compelling.
Conversely, the Intel Core i5-14500 is the choice for general-purpose desktop compute that leans on math and data manipulation. It wins PassMark integer math by 10.7% (108124 vs 97654), floating-point math by 12.7% (79576 vs 70640), and data compression by 11.2% (371294 vs 333785). Its 7% lead in Cinebench R20 multi-core (10985 vs 10268) shows it is not simply weaker in all multi-threaded scenarios. The i5-14500 also takes the single-thread PassMark test, albeit narrowly, at 3952 versus 3944 (0.2%). The verdict is clear: the 270H for rendering and physics, the i5-14500 for arithmetic-heavy and encryption-heavy tasks.
Architecture Differences
Both chips share the Raptor Lake architecture and a 10 nm process node from Intel, but they diverge in packaging and configuration. The i5-14500 is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, while the 270H is a mobile chip on Intel BGA 1744. The core counts are identical at 14 cores and 20 threads, and both have 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The differences appear in L2 cache: the i5-14500 has 1.25 MB per core, while the 270H has 2 MB per core — a 60% larger per-core L2 allocation. This could explain the 270H’s stronger single-core performance in Cinebench tests.
Clock speeds also differ significantly. The i5-14500 has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost of 5.00 GHz, whereas the 270H has a base of 2.70 GHz and a boost of 5.80 GHz. The 270H’s higher boost clock likely drives its Cinebench R23 single-core win (2040 vs 1917, 6% ahead) and its massive R15 single-core lead (347 vs 273, 21.3%). The TDPs reflect their intended environments: the i5-14500 is rated at 65 W, while the 270H is rated at 45 W — a lower thermal envelope for mobile. The i5-14500 supports ECC memory, but the 270H does not. PCIe lanes also differ: 16 lanes on the i5-14500 versus 8 lanes on the 270H. The integrated graphics are different as well, with the i5-14500 featuring UHD Graphics 770 and the 270H featuring Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.
Where Each One Wins
The benchmark data reveals clear domains of superiority. The Intel Core 9 270H wins in rendering-oriented and physics-based workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18000 is the standout, and it also wins R15 multi-core (2464 vs 2435) and R15 single-core (347 vs 273). The PassMark physics test (1966 vs 1746) and prime number finding (112 vs 106) round out its niche. These wins suggest the 270H excels in tasks that stress raw core throughput and single-thread responsiveness, likely benefiting from its higher boost clock.
The Intel Core i5-14500 wins in data-centric and arithmetic workloads. It dominates PassMark floating-point math (79576 vs 70640, 12.7%), integer math (108124 vs 97654, 10.7%), data compression (371294 vs 333785, 11.2%), data encryption (21457 vs 19369, 10.8%), extended instructions (22473 vs 20079, 11.9%), and random string sorting (40980 vs 36867, 11.2%). It also wins PassMark multi-thread (30777 vs 28764, 7%) and the narrow single-thread PassMark test (3952 vs 3944, 0.2%). In Cinebench R20, the i5-14500 wins both multi-core (10985 vs 10268, 7%) and single-core (1550 vs 1449, 7%). The i5-14500’s wins cluster around repetitive math and data manipulation, while the 270H’s wins are in rendering and physics.
FAQ
Q: Which CPU has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i5-14500 has an average benchmark score of 38531, while the Intel Core 9 270H scores 38335. The i5-14500 is 0.5% ahead according to the nearestRivals data.
Q: How do the two CPUs compare in single-core performance?
A: The Intel Core 9 270H wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 21.3% (347 vs 273) and Cinebench R23 single-core by 6% (2040 vs 1917). However, the i5-14500 wins PassMark single-thread by 0.2% (3952 vs 3944).
Q: Which CPU is better for multi-threaded rendering?
A: The Intel Core 9 270H leads in Cinebench R23 multi-core with 18000 versus 15012, a 16.6% advantage. It also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core (2464 vs 2435). The i5-14500 only wins Cinebench R20 multi-core (10985 vs 10268, 7%).
Q: What are the cache differences between the two?
A: Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The difference is in L2 cache: the i5-14500 has 1.25 MB per core, while the 270H has 2 MB per core.
Q: Do both CPUs support the same memory types?
A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. However, the i5-14500 supports ECC memory, while the 270H does not.
Q: Which CPU has more PCIe lanes?
A: The Intel Core i5-14500 has Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 9 270H has Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only).
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The biggest win for the Intel Core 9 270H is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 18000 versus the i5-14500’s 15012, a 16.6% margin. This is the largest delta in any multi-threaded test and suggests the 270H sustains higher multi-core throughput under prolonged load. The 270H also wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 21.3% (347 vs 273), which is the largest single-core gap in the entire comparison. Its physics win (1966 vs 1746, 11.2%) and prime number win (112 vs 106, 5.4%) reinforce a pattern of strength in compute-heavy, non-math-specific tasks. The 270H additionally takes Cinebench R23 single-core (2040 vs 1917, 6%) and R15 multi-core (2464 vs 2435, 1.2%).
The Intel Core i5-14500’s largest win is in PassMark floating-point math, where it scores 79576 versus 70640, a 12.7% advantage. It also leads in extended instructions by 11.9% (22473 vs 20079), data compression by 11.2% (371294 vs 333785), random string sorting by 11.2% (40980 vs 36867), and data encryption by 10.8% (21457 vs 19369). Integer math shows a 10.7% lead (108124 vs 97654). In Cinebench R20, the i5-14500 wins both multi-core (10985 vs 10268, 7%) and single-core (1550 vs 1449, 7%). The PassMark multi-thread test goes to the i5-14500 at 30777 versus 28764 (7%), and the single-thread PassMark test is nearly a tie, with the i5-14500 ahead by 0.2% (3952 vs 3944). The i5-14500 wins 11 of 17 tests, but the 270H’s wins include the most demanding rendering benchmark.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core i5-14500 uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Intel Core 9 270H uses Intel BGA 1744. The i5-14500 has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost of 5.00 GHz, whereas the 270H has a base of 2.70 GHz and a boost of 5.80 GHz. The TDP is 65 W for the i5-14500 and 45 W for the 270H. L2 cache differs: 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14500 versus 2 MB per core on the 270H. The i5-14500 supports ECC memory, but the 270H does not. PCIe lanes are 16 (Gen 5) on the i5-14500 versus 8 (Gen 5) on the 270H. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 on the i5-14500 and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the 270H. The release dates differ, with the i5-14500 launched on 2024-01-07 and the 270H on 2024-12-17. The i5-14500 has a launch MSRP of $232, while the 270H has a launch MSRP of $697. The die size is 215 mm² for the i5-14500, but no die size is listed for the 270H.