Intel Core 7 360 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core 7 360 includes a full benchmark suite, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no benchmark scores listed in the database. Consequently, direct head-to-head comparisons are limited to the specifications and the Intel part's measured performance. The Intel Core 7 360 posts an average benchmark score of 18374, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the Intel Core i3-13100 (18380, delta 0%), Intel Core 5 330 (18345, delta 0.2%), Intel Core i3-14100 (18318, delta 0.3%), and Intel Core 3 305 (18302, delta 0.4%). These deltas are marginal, indicating that the Core 7 360 sits in a tightly clustered performance band.

Within its own benchmark results, the Intel Core 7 360 shows substantial multi-core capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13634 multi-core and 1924 single-core. The R20 results are 5726 multi-core and 808 single-core, while R15 shows 1374 multi-core and 193 single-core. These results indicate that the single-core performance scales consistently across Cinebench versions, with the multi-core scores showing strong scaling relative to the core count. The PassMark suite further details the processor's strengths: multithread score of 15544, single-thread score of 4274, integer math at 34238, floating-point math at 44963, and extended instructions at 12390. Data compression reaches 142877, while encryption scores 11164 and random string sorting hits 17636. The physics score is 1213, and the find prime numbers test yields 120.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no recorded benchmarks, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile rank is 50, which is a placeholder value rather than a measured result, given the absence of scores. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the wins counter shows zero for both parts. Therefore, any quantitative comparison must focus on architectural and specification differences, not on measured performance. The Intel part's data confirms its position among comparable x86 mobile processors, but no statement can be made about the Snapdragon's relative performance without recorded measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 7 360?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has an average benchmark score of 18374, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-13100, scores 18380, a delta of 0%.

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has an empty benchmark array, an average score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile of 50 is not derived from measured scores.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads. Both parts lack simultaneous multithreading, as core count equals thread count for each.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth specifications compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 uses a single-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses a triple-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 228.6 GB/s, supporting only LPDDR5X. The Snapdragon's memory bus width and bandwidth are significantly larger.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has a base clock of 4.45 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Snapdragon's base clock is substantially higher, while the Intel part has a slightly higher boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a higher L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 9 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 16 MB of L2 cache per module and 288 KB of L1 cache per core.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows that the Intel Core 7 360 is a measured, active mobile processor with a complete benchmark profile. Its average score of 18374 and 72nd percentile ranking place it among established x86 parts like the Core i3-13100 and Core 5 330, with performance deltas under 0.5% relative to those rivals. Users seeking a processor with verified multi-core and single-core results, such as the Cinebench R23 scores of 13634 and 1924 respectively, will find the Intel part fully characterized.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100, in contrast, has no benchmark data in the database. While its specification sheet shows a larger core count, higher base clock, and broader memory interface, none of these features are validated by measured performance. The absence of scores means the Snapdragon cannot be recommended on the basis of benchmark evidence. Its 50th percentile rank is unsubstantiated.

From the available data, the Intel Core 7 360 is the only part with quantitative performance evidence. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 remains an unmeasured entry, and any selection between the two must rely on the Intel part's recorded results. The Intel processor also carries a launch MSRP of $426, which is the only pricing information available in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Intel Core 7 360 uses 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses 18 cores and 18 threads. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz; the Snapdragon has a base clock of 4.45 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Intel processor has a TDP of 15, while the Snapdragon has no TDP listed.

The sockets differ: Intel BGA 1516 for the Core 7 360, and Qualcomm BGA 2343 for the Snapdragon. The process nodes are both 3 nm, but the foundries differ: Intel for the Core 7 360, and TSMC for the Snapdragon. The die size is listed only for the Snapdragon at 220 mm², while the Intel part has no die size recorded. Cache configurations are distinct: the Intel part has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. The Snapdragon has 288 KB L1 per core, 16 MB L2 per module, and 9 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs: the Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth; the Snapdragon supports only LPDDR5X with a triple-channel bus and 228.6 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe generations and lane counts also differ: the Intel part uses Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only), while the Snapdragon uses Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are different as well: Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) for the Core 7 360, and Adreno X2-90 for the Snapdragon. The release dates are close, with the Intel part on 2026-04-15 and the Snapdragon on 2026-04-05. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $426, while the Snapdragon has none listed.

Architecture Differences

The architectural records show distinct design approaches. The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses the Glymur codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X2 (Elite) generation. Both are built on a 3 nm process, but Intel fabricates its chip at its own foundry, while the Snapdragon is fabricated by TSMC. The Intel part's die size is not recorded, while the Snapdragon has a known die size of 220 mm².

The cache hierarchy reflects different design philosophies. The Intel part uses a per-core L1 of 192 KB and per-core L2 of 2.5 MB, with a shared 6 MB L3. The Snapdragon uses a larger per-core L1 of 288 KB, a per-module L2 of 16 MB, and a shared 9 MB L3. The Snapdragon's L2 organization per module suggests a clustered core layout, whereas the Intel part uses a more conventional per-core L2. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The memory controllers differ fundamentally: the Intel part uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Snapdragon uses a triple-channel bus with 228.6 GB/s bandwidth. This indicates that the Snapdragon is designed for memory-intensive workloads, while the Intel part targets lower power consumption with a 15 TDP. The PCIe interfaces also differ in generation and lanes: Gen 4 with 6 lanes for Intel, and Gen 5 with 12 lanes for Qualcomm. The integrated GPU architectures are distinct as well, with Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) on the Core 7 360 and Adreno X2-90 on the Snapdragon.

The production status for both parts is Active. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are SAE3E for Intel and X2E94100 for Qualcomm. The market segment for both is Mobile. The Snapdragon's manufacturer field is listed as "Unknown," while the Intel part clearly lists Intel as the manufacturer. These architectural differences indicate that the two processors target different design points: the Intel part emphasizes lower TDP and simplicity, while the Snapdragon prioritizes core count, cache capacity, and memory bandwidth.