Intel Core 7 360 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Intel Core 7 360 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H: a comparison of two mobile processors from the same foundry, both built on a 3 nm process, but with sharply different designs. The Core 7 360 is a 6-core, 6-thread part with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, while the Core Ultra 5 336H packs 16 cores and 16 threads with a 4.60 GHz boost. The recorded benchmark data shows a clear split: the Core Ultra 5 336H dominates nearly every multi-threaded and compute-heavy workload, while the Core 7 360 secures a narrow but consistent single-thread victory in one specific test series.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is remarkably one-sided. Across 15 of the 17 recorded tests, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H takes the win. The largest margin appears in PassMark's find prime numbers test, where the Ultra 5 336H scores 299 against 120 for the Core 7 360, a delta of -59.9% from the Core 7 360's perspective. Physics processing shows a similar gap: 2682 versus 1213, a -54.8% difference. These are not marginal leads; they indicate a fundamental throughput advantage for the 16-core part.

Cinebench results reinforce the pattern. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ultra 5 336H scores 23991, while the Core 7 360 manages 13634, a -43.2% delta. The same -43.2% delta appears across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core variants. For example, Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 10076 versus 5726, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows 341 versus 193. Every Cinebench metric lands on the same relative gap, suggesting a consistent architectural scaling factor rather than workload-specific variation.

PassMark integer math tells a similar story: 62070 for the Ultra 5 336H versus 34238 for the Core 7 360, a -44.8% delta. Floating point math follows with 82415 versus 44963, a -45.4% delta. Data compression favors the Ultra 5 336H at 280340 versus 142877, a -49% gap, while data encryption shows 21291 versus 11164, a -47.6% delta. Extended instructions, random string sorting, and multithread scores all fall in the same range, with deltas between -45.5% and -49.5%. The Ultra 5 336H's multithread score of 28545 nearly doubles the Core 7 360's 15544.

The only two wins for the Core 7 360 come from PassMark's single-thread and singlethread tests, which are duplicate entries in the data. In both, the Core 7 360 scores 4274 versus 4013 for the Ultra 5 336H, a 6.5% advantage. This is a real but narrow lead, and it stands in contrast to the Cinebench single-core results, where the Ultra 5 336H wins by the same -43.2% delta seen in multi-core. The discrepancy between PassMark single-thread and Cinebench single-core suggests the two tests measure different aspects of single-thread performance, with the Core 7 360's higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz possibly playing a role in the PassMark result.

Where Each One Wins

The data points to a clear division of labor. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins in every heavily parallel workload: Cinebench render loops, PassMark integer and floating point math, data compression and encryption, extended instruction throughput, prime number generation, physics simulation, and random string sorting. Its 16 cores and 16 threads give it a 2.67x core count advantage over the Core 7 360, and the benchmark deltas of roughly 43% to 60% reflect that scaling in practice. For any task that can use multiple threads, the Ultra 5 336H is the stronger part by a wide margin.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins only in PassMark's single-threaded test, where it posts 4274 against 4013, a 6.5% edge. This is a narrow victory, and it does not extend to Cinebench single-core, where the Ultra 5 336H leads by the same -43.2% delta seen elsewhere. The Core 7 360's higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz may contribute to its PassMark single-thread lead, but the Cinebench results suggest that the Ultra 5 336H's architecture delivers better single-core performance in that specific benchmark. A user relying on single-threaded PassMark scores would favor the Core 7 360, while a user prioritizing Cinebench single-core would favor the Ultra 5 336H.

Looking at the average benchmark scores, the Ultra 5 336H sits at 34485, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core 7 360 averages 18374, at the 72nd percentile. The nearest rivals for the Ultra 5 336H include the Intel Core i7-13700HX (avg score 34554, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i5-13450HX (34333, +0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34260, +0.7%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222, +0.8%). The Core 7 360's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i3-13100 (18380, 0%), the Intel Core 5 330 (18345, +0.2%), the Intel Core i3-14100 (18318, +0.3%), and the Intel Core 3 305 (18302, +0.4%). These groupings confirm that the two processors occupy different performance tiers, with the Ultra 5 336H competing against desktop-class HX parts and the Core 7 360 sitting alongside low-core-count desktop chips.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge in almost every structural dimension. The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename with a generation label of "Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)" and 6 cores, 6 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses Panther Lake architecture with a "Ultra 5 (Panther Lake-H)" generation label and 16 cores, 16 threads. Both are built on a 3 nm process by Intel, but the Ultra 5 336H has significantly more compute resources.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The L1 cache is identical at 192 KB per core, and L2 is also the same at 2.5 MB per core. The L3 cache, however, favors the Ultra 5 336H: 18 MB shared versus 6 MB shared for the Core 7 360, a threefold difference. This larger L3 pool likely helps the Ultra 5 336H in workloads with repeated data access, such as the data compression and encryption tests where it leads by roughly 47% to 49%.

Memory support and bandwidth also separate the two. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, but the Core 7 360 runs single-channel with a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, while the Ultra 5 336H runs dual-channel with 115.2 GB/s. The Ultra 5 336H's bandwidth is nearly double, which aligns with its large lead in memory-sensitive benchmarks like random string sorting (34402 versus 17636, a -48.7% delta). The Core 7 360's single-channel memory bus is a notable constraint for a processor with a 4.80 GHz boost clock.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The Core 7 360 offers Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only), while the Ultra 5 336H provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Ultra 5 336H both a newer PCIe generation and double the lane count, which matters for storage and discrete GPU throughput. Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 7 360 has Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Ultra 5 336H has Intel Xe3 Graphics without a specified Xe core count in the data. Both target the mobile segment and are currently in active production.

Base clocks differ slightly, with the Core 7 360 at 1.50 GHz and the Ultra 5 336H at 1.90 GHz, but the boost clocks reverse that order: 4.80 GHz for the Core 7 360 and 4.60 GHz for the Ultra 5 336H. The TDP also differs, with the Core 7 360 rated at 15 W and the Ultra 5 336H at 25 W. The sockets are different: Intel BGA 1516 for the Core 7 360 and Intel BGA 2540 for the Ultra 5 336H. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither supports ECC memory.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a straightforward choice. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the superior processor for nearly every recorded workload. It wins 15 of 17 head-to-head tests, with deltas ranging from about 43% to nearly 60% in the Ultra 5 336H's favor. Its 16 cores, 18 MB L3 cache, dual-channel memory at 115.2 GB/s, and Gen 5 PCIe with 12 lanes position it as a high-throughput mobile part. The average benchmark score of 34485 places it in the 84th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i7-13700HX and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, both desktop-class processors.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins only in PassMark single-thread tests, with a 6.5% edge over the Ultra 5 336H. Its 4.80 GHz boost clock and lower 15 W TDP suggest a design aimed at efficiency and light-thread responsiveness, but the data shows that even in single-core Cinebench tests, the Ultra 5 336H leads by the same -43.2% delta seen in multi-core. The Core 7 360's average benchmark score of 18374 places it in the 72nd percentile, with nearest rivals being low-core-count desktop chips like the Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core i3-14100.

For a user selecting a processor strictly on the recorded benchmarks, the Ultra 5 336H is the clear choice for any multi-threaded or memory-intensive application. The Core 7 360 offers a single-thread PassMark advantage but loses decisively elsewhere. The data does not support the Core 7 360 for compute-heavy tasks, rendering, or data processing. The Ultra 5 336H delivers more cores, more cache, more memory bandwidth, and a higher average benchmark score, and it does so while remaining in the mobile market segment. The Core 7 360's only recorded strength is a narrow PassMark single-thread lead, which may appeal to workloads that depend on that specific metric, but the broader Cinebench single-core results contradict that advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a dual-channel memory bus with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel Core 7 360 has a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s.

Q: Which processor wins in PassMark single-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 scores 4274 in PassMark single-thread tests, a 6.5% advantage over the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's 4013.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 multi-core scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 23991, while the Intel Core 7 360 scores 13634, a -43.2% delta in favor of the Ultra 5 336H.

Q: Are both processors built on the same process node?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 7 360 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H are built on a 3 nm process by Intel.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 360 | Intel Core Ultra 5 336H |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 6 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 25 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Codename | Wildcat Lake | Panther Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) | Ultra 5 (Panther Lake-H) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Launch MSRP | $426 | Not available |

| Part Number | SAE3E | SA4RD |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2026-01-04 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 18374 | 34485 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 72 | 84 |