Intel Core 7 350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 7 350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. This means that no standardized, side-by-side performance measurements have been recorded that pit these two mobile processors directly against each other in the same test conditions.

What the database does provide is a full benchmark profile for the Intel Core 7 350 and a completely empty benchmark profile for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100. The Qualcomm part has a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 71st percentile. The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17,779 across all recorded tests, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has an average benchmark score of zero, indicating that no performance data has been captured for it.

Without recorded scores for the Qualcomm processor, the numeric comparison between the two is limited to architectural specifications and the Intel part's measured performance profile. The Intel Core 7 350 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,030 and a single-core score of 2,046. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5,373 and the single-core score is 758. The Cinebench R15 results show 1,220 multi-core and 292 single-core.

The PassMark suite for the Intel part shows a single-thread score of 4,100, a multithread score of 15,170, and an integer math score of 33,734. Floating point math reaches 42,809, while extended instructions score 12,045. Data compression scores 143,123, data encryption scores 10,933, and the find prime numbers test scores 107. Random string sorting scores 17,238, and the physics test scores 1,173.

The nearest recorded rivals for the Intel Core 7 350 provide context for its average score. The Intel Core 5 221TE has an average score of 17,860, which is 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT averages 17,891, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Core 5 120U averages 17,898, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 9374F averages 17,693, which is 0.5% lower. These delta values show that the Intel Core 7 350 sits within a tight cluster of similarly performing desktop and mobile processors.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 has recorded wins in every benchmark category present in the database, simply because the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has no recorded benchmark scores. The Intel part shows a consistent performance profile across rendering, encryption, compression, and physics workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,030 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 2,046 shows capable per-thread speed.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 cannot be credited with any benchmark wins from the recorded data. Its benchmark array is empty, and its average score is zero. The database indicates a 50th percentile rank for the Qualcomm part, which places it at the median of all CPUs, but this rank is not supported by any individual test scores.

For use-case analysis, the Intel Core 7 350 demonstrates measurable strengths in tasks that rely on single-threaded performance. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4,100 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,046 suggest responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The multi-threaded tests, including the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,030 and the PassMark multithread score of 15,170, indicate solid throughput for parallel workloads.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has no measured data to assess for any use case. Its specifications show 10 cores and 10 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. It uses the Oryon core design, a 4 nm process from TSMC, and a dual-channel LPDDR5X memory interface. None of these specifications translate into recorded benchmark wins.

The Intel part's PassMark data compression score of 143,123 is its highest single recorded result, indicating strong performance in data handling tasks. The data encryption score of 10,933 is comparatively modest. The extended instructions score of 12,045 and the integer math score of 33,734 round out its computational profile. The floating point math score of 42,809 shows particular strength in that area.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear choice for benchmark-driven users: the Intel Core 7 350, because it has measured performance and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has none. The Intel part's 71st percentile rank among all CPUs and its average benchmark score of 17,779 provide a concrete performance baseline. The Qualcomm part's 50th percentile rank carries no supporting benchmark scores, making direct performance assessment impossible.

Users who require verified performance data should select the Intel Core 7 350. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,030, a single-core score of 2,046, and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,100. The processor uses 6 cores and 6 threads with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its 3 nm process node from Intel and Wildcat Lake codename place it in the Core 5 generation family.

Users considering the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 must rely on its architectural specifications alone, as no benchmark results exist in the database. It offers 10 cores and 10 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The Oryon codename and Snapdragon X Plus generation identify it as a Qualcomm design, and the 4 nm TSMC process node represents a different manufacturing approach. Its dual-channel memory bus with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth surpasses the Intel part's single-channel 59.7 GB/s, but this specification advantage is not reflected in any measured performance data.

The data does not support a performance comparison between the two processors. The Intel Core 7 350 has a complete benchmark profile, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has none. For any workload measured by the database, only the Intel part can be evaluated.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 350 outperform the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 in Cinebench R23?

A: The database has no Cinebench R23 score for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100. The Intel Core 7 350 records a multi-core score of 8,030 and a single-core score of 2,046 in that test.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17,779. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no recorded benchmark data.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: What is the percentile rank of each processor among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 sits at the 71st percentile. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a larger L2 cache per core?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has 12 MB of L2 cache per module. The Intel Core 7 350 has 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 7 350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 differ significantly in their core architectures, manufacturing processes, and memory subsystems. The Intel part uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm part uses the Oryon codename, belongs to the Snapdragon X Plus generation, and is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC.

Core counts diverge sharply. The Intel Core 7 350 provides 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyper-threading. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 provides 10 cores and 10 threads. Clock speeds also differ: the Intel part has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Qualcomm part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The Intel Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Qualcomm part's larger per-core L1 and per-module L2 allocations suggest a design aimed at higher memory throughput per thread.

Memory support varies considerably. The Intel Core 7 350 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory types, uses a single-channel memory bus, and achieves a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 supports only LPDDR5X memory, uses a dual-channel memory bus, and achieves a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Qualcomm part's memory bandwidth is more than double that of the Intel part, which could affect memory-intensive workloads, though no benchmark data exists to confirm this.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The Intel Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), doubling the available lane count for peripherals.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Intel Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 uses the Adreno X1-85. No graphics benchmark data is recorded for either part.

Thermal design power differs, with the Intel Core 7 350 rated at 15 W and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 rated at 35 W. The Intel part uses socket Intel BGA 1516, while the Qualcomm part uses socket Qualcomm BGA 2073. Both parts are marked as active in production, and both have locked multipliers. Neither supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469; the Qualcomm part has no recorded launch MSRP.