Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core i9-14901KE Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 350 and Intel Core i9-14901KE serve entirely different segments, and the recorded data reflects that split. The Core 7 350 is a mobile processor with 6 cores and 6 threads, a 15 W TDP, and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Core i9-14901KE is a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 125 W TDP, and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The Core i9-14901KE has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, while the Core 7 350 has a full set of measurements. The Core 7 350 sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17779. The Core i9-14901KE sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, meaning no direct comparison is possible from the recorded benchmark data.

The Core 7 350 is the only one of the two with usable performance data. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core 5 221TE (average score 17860, 0.5% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (average score 17891, 0.6% ahead), the Intel Core 5 120U (average score 17898, 0.7% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 9374F (average score 17693, 0.5% behind). The Core 7 350 falls within a narrow band around these scores, indicating it performs on par with mid-range desktop and mobile parts from previous generations. The Core i9-14901KE, lacking recorded scores, cannot be positioned relative to these rivals.

For a buyer choosing between these two, the data only supports a decision based on platform and feature differences, not benchmark performance. The Core 7 350 is the mobile option with integrated Xe3 graphics and a 3 nm process. The Core i9-14901KE is the desktop option with a larger cache, dual-channel memory support, ECC memory capability, and PCIe Gen 5. The Core i9-14901KE carries an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 7 350 does not. The Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469. The Core i9-14901KE has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 7 350 wins in the only category with measurable results: benchmark scores. Its recorded data covers Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, plus a range of PassMark tests. The Core i9-14901KE has no recorded scores in any test, so it cannot claim a single benchmark win from the database.

The Core i9-14901KE wins on specification breadth. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 6 threads. It has a larger shared L3 cache of 36 MB versus 6 MB. It supports dual-channel memory, while the Core 7 350 is single-channel. It supports ECC memory, which the Core 7 350 does not. It has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, compared to 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. It has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, while the Core 7 350 is locked. It also runs at a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.80 GHz, against 1.50 GHz and 4.80 GHz respectively.

The Core 7 350 wins on process node and graphics. It uses a 3 nm process versus the Core i9-14901KE's 10 nm process. Its integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core i9-14901KE has UHD Graphics 770. The Core 7 350 also has a lower TDP of 15 W versus 125 W, which reflects its mobile design intent.

Architecture Differences

The Core 7 350 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry, with a codename of Wildcat Lake. Its generation is listed as "Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)". It uses 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyperthreading implied by the equal core and thread counts. Its cache structure consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus, delivering a recorded memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. It uses a PCIe Gen 4 interface with 6 CPU-only lanes. The socket is Intel BGA 1516, indicating a soldered mobile part. It includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The production status is active, and the release date is 2026-04-15.

The Core i9-14901KE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a codename of Raptor Lake-R and an architecture of Raptor Lake. Its generation is listed as "Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)". It uses 8 cores and 16 threads, implying hyperthreading. Its cache structure consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The die size is recorded as 257 mm². The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus; no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. It uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, a standard desktop LGA socket. It includes UHD Graphics 770. ECC memory is supported. The multiplier is unlocked. The production status is active, and the release date is 2024-06-30.

The two differ fundamentally in target platform: one is mobile (BGA socket, 15 W TDP, single-channel memory), the other is desktop (LGA socket, 125 W TDP, dual-channel memory). The process node difference is notable: 3 nm versus 10 nm. The Core 7 350 has a newer process but fewer cores and less cache. The Core i9-14901KE has an older process but more cores, more threads, and a much larger shared L3 cache.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Does the Core 7 350 support ECC memory?

A: No. The database records ECC memory as false for the Core 7 350. The Core i9-14901KE records ECC memory as true.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process. The Core i9-14901KE uses a 10 nm process. Both are fabricated by Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core i9-14901KE has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The Core 7 350 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes. The database lists production status as "Active" for both the Core 7 350 and the Core i9-14901KE.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Core i9-14901KE supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. The Core i9-14901KE has an empty benchmark array, and the headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty. This means the only performance data available belongs to the Core 7 350.

The Core 7 350's recorded scores provide a baseline for its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, it scores 8030 multi-core and 2046 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5373 multi-core and 758 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1220 multi-core and 292 single-core. In PassMark tests, it scores 143123 in data compression, 10933 in data encryption, 12045 in extended instructions, 107 in find prime numbers, 42809 in floating point math, 33734 in integer math, 15170 in multithread, 1173 in physics, 17238 in random string sorting, and 4100 in single thread.

The average benchmark score for the Core 7 350 is 17779, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 221TE, scores 17860, which is 0.5% higher. The AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Core 5 120U scores 17898, which is 0.7% higher.

Because the Core i9-14901KE has no recorded benchmark scores, no direct head-to-head comparison can be made. The Core 7 350's wins are all against its nearest rivals, not against the Core i9-14901KE. The data shows the Core 7 350 sits in a competitive band among those rivals, with deltas ranging from 0.5% to 0.7% in either direction. The largest gap among its nearest rivals is 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9374F and 0.7% behind the Intel Core 5 120U. This narrow range indicates the Core 7 350 performs consistently with those processors, but the Core i9-14901KE remains unmeasured in the database.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Intel Core 7 350 and the Intel Core i9-14901KE:

• Cores: 6 (Core 7 350) versus 8 (Core i9-14901KE)
• Threads: 6 (Core 7 350) versus 16 (Core i9-14901KE)
• Base clock: 1.50 GHz (Core 7 350) versus 3.80 GHz (Core i9-14901KE)
• Boost clock: 4.80 GHz (Core 7 350) versus 5.80 GHz (Core i9-14901KE)
• TDP: 15 W (Core 7 350) versus 125 W (Core i9-14901KE)
• Socket: Intel BGA 1516 (Core 7 350) versus Intel Socket 1700 (Core i9-14901KE)
• Codename: Wildcat Lake (Core 7 350) versus Raptor Lake-R (Core i9-14901KE)
• Generation: Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) (Core 7 350) versus Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) (Core i9-14901KE)
• Process node: 3 nm (Core 7 350) versus 10 nm (Core i9-14901KE)
• Die size: Not recorded (Core 7 350) versus 257 mm² (Core i9-14901KE)
• L1 cache: 192 KB per core (Core 7 350) versus 80 KB per core (Core i9-14901KE)
• L2 cache: 2.5 MB per core (Core 7 350) versus 2 MB per core (Core i9-14901KE)
• L3 cache: 6 MB shared (Core 7 350) versus 36 MB shared (Core i9-14901KE)
• Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X (Core 7 350) versus DDR4, DDR5 (Core i9-14901KE)
• Memory bus: Single-channel (Core 7 350) versus Dual-channel (Core i9-14901KE)
• Memory bandwidth: 59.7 GB/s (Core 7 350) versus not recorded (Core i9-14901KE)
• ECC memory: false (Core 7 350) versus true (Core i9-14901KE)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 6 lanes (Core 7 350) versus Gen 5, 16 lanes (Core i9-14901KE)
• Integrated graphics: Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) (Core 7 350) versus UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14901KE)
• Market segment: Mobile (Core 7 350) versus Desktop (Core i9-14901KE)
• Release date: 2026-04-15 (Core 7 350) versus 2024-06-30 (Core i9-14901KE)
• Launch MSRP: $469 (Core 7 350) versus not recorded (Core i9-14901KE)
• Unlocked multiplier: false (Core 7 350) versus true (Core i9-14901KE)
• Part number: SAE3F (Core 7 350) versus Q49DSRNJC (Core i9-14901KE)
• Percentile: 71 (Core 7 350) versus 50 (Core i9-14901KE)
• Average benchmark score: 17779 (Core 7 350) versus 0 (Core i9-14901KE)