Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison
Intel Core 7 350
Core i5-14501E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core i5-14501E
Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core i5-14501E
The Intel Core 7 350 and the Intel Core i5-14501E occupy very different positions in the desktop and mobile landscape. The Core 7 350 is a low-power mobile processor built on a 3 nm process, while the i5-14501E is a 65 W desktop part on a 10 nm process with hyper-threading and a much larger cache. Benchmark data for the Core 7 350 shows it outperforming the i5-14501E in every recorded metric where the i5 has no recorded scores at all; the database lists no benchmark results for the i5-14501E, making direct comparison reliant on architectural and specification differences rather than head-to-head measurements. The Core 7 350 scores in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-14501E sits in the 50th percentile, and the Core 7 350 carries a launch MSRP of $469. The i5-14501E has no recorded average benchmark score, while the Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779.
Where Each One Wins
The Core 7 350 wins in every category where benchmark scores exist, because the i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark results in the database. When comparing the two processors based on the available data, the Core 7 350 is the only one with measurable performance. Its single-thread score of 4100 in Passmark single-thread testing and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2046 indicate strong per-core performance for a 15 W mobile chip. The i5-14501E, despite having no benchmark scores, has a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz on the Core 7 350, and more threads, which suggests the i5 may win in heavily threaded workloads if measured, but the database does not confirm this with any recorded results.
The Core 7 350 wins in efficiency, as its 15 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 65 W TDP of the i5-14501E. For mobile or compact systems, the Core 7 350 is the clear choice based on power draw alone. The i5-14501E wins in raw specification categories: it has 12 threads versus 6, a larger 24 MB shared L3 cache versus 6 MB, a dual-channel memory bus versus single-channel, ECC memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 6 lanes. These specification advantages do not translate into recorded benchmark wins because the i5-14501E has no scores in the database. The Core 7 350 wins in process technology, using a 3 nm node versus 10 nm, and in integrated graphics, featuring Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i5.
Architecture Differences
The Core 7 350 is built on Wildcat Lake, a 3 nm process, and is classified in the Core 5 generation. The i5-14501E is based on Raptor Lake, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. The process node difference is substantial: 3 nm versus 10 nm, which explains the massive TDP gap between the two (15 W versus 65 W). The Core 7 350 uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket, making it a soldered mobile processor, while the i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop LGA socket. The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, so no hyper-threading; the i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, meaning each core supports two threads. The Core 7 350 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.
Cache layouts differ significantly. The Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The i5-14501E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The i5-14501E also has a die size of 215 mm², while the Core 7 350 has no recorded die size. Memory support diverges: the Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s; the i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus and no recorded memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14501E but not on the Core 7 350. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Core 7 350 offers Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes, while the i5-14501E offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are different as well, with the Core 7 350 using Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores and the i5-14501E using UHD Graphics 770. The i5-14501E was released on 2024-06-30, while the Core 7 350 has a release date of 2026-04-15.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
There are no head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two processors. The i5-14501E has an empty benchmark list, so all recorded performance data comes from the Core 7 350 alone. The Core 7 350 delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8030 and a single-core score of 2046. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5373 multicore and 758 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 1220 multicore and 292 single-core. In Passmark tests, the Core 7 350 reaches 15170 in multithread, 4100 in single-thread, 42809 in floating point math, 33734 in integer math, 143123 in data compression, 10933 in data encryption, 12045 in extended instructions, 17238 in random string sorting, 1173 in physics, and 107 in find prime numbers.
Because the i5-14501E has no scores, the data cannot show any wins for that processor. The nearest rivals to the Core 7 350 in the database are the Intel Core 5 221TE with an average score of 17860 and a difference of -0.5%, the AMD EPYC 9374F with 17693 and +0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT with 17891 and -0.6%, and the Intel Core 5 120U with 17898 and -0.7%. These numbers indicate that the Core 7 350 performs in line with a group of desktop and mobile chips that span from a low-power Intel Core 5 to a high-end AMD EPYC server processor. The Core 7 350 sits slightly below the Core 5 221TE, the Ryzen 5 3600XT, and the Core 5 120U, while sitting slightly above the EPYC 9374F in average benchmark score. The 71st percentile ranking for the Core 7 350 places it above the majority of all CPUs in the database, whereas the i5-14501E at the 50th percentile is exactly at the median, though this ranking is not accompanied by any benchmark scores.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more threads?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 12 threads from 6 cores, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 threads from 6 cores, so the i5-14501E has twice the thread count.
Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?
A: The Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 W, while the i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 W. The Core 7 350 uses significantly less power.
Q: Does the i5-14501E support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The Core 7 350 does not support ECC memory.
Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?
A: The Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770.
Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?
A: The i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 7 350 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: What is the memory bus configuration for each?
A: The Core 7 350 uses a single-channel memory bus and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The i5-14501E uses a dual-channel memory bus and supports DDR4 and DDR5.
The Verdict
Based on the recorded data, the Core 7 350 is the only processor with benchmark results, so it is the only one that can be judged on measured performance. Its 71st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 17779 place it well above the i5-14501E, which has an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. The Core 7 350 delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8030 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4100, indicating strong performance for a 15 W mobile processor. The i5-14501E, with no recorded scores, cannot be compared on performance, but its specification sheet shows a 65 W desktop part with 12 threads, a 5.20 GHz boost clock, 24 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel memory, and ECC support. The Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process and a BGA 1516 socket, while the i5-14501E uses a 10 nm process and Socket 1700, so the two target different platforms entirely.
For mobile or low-power systems, the Core 7 350 is the clear choice, as the data confirms its performance profile and its 15 W TDP suits compact designs. For desktop systems needing ECC memory, more PCIe lanes, and higher thread count, the i5-14501E offers those features on paper, but the database does not provide any benchmark verification. The Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469, while the i5-14501E has no recorded launch MSRP. The Core 7 350 is the only processor of the two with measured scores, and those scores place it in the upper tier of all CPUs. The i5-14501E remains an unmeasured desktop part, and its 50th percentile ranking is the only performance-related data point available for it.
Specification Differences
The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, a base clock of 1.50 GHz, a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and a TDP of 15 W. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 3.30 GHz, a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and a TDP of 65 W. The Core 7 350 uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket, while the i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700. The Core 7 350 is built on a 3 nm process with the Wildcat Lake codename, while the i5-14501E is built on a 10 nm process with the Raptor Lake-R codename and a die size of 215 mm². The Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3; the i5-14501E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Memory support differs: the Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and no recorded bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14501E but not on the Core 7 350. PCIe connectivity: the Core 7 350 has Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes, while the i5-14501E has Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics: the Core 7 350 has Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the i5-14501E has UHD Graphics 770. The Core 7 350 has a release date of 2026-04-15, while the i5-14501E has a release date of 2024-06-30. The Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469, while the i5-14501E has no recorded launch MSRP. The Core 7 350 has a 71st percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 17779, while the i5-14501E has a 50th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 0.