Intel Core 7 350 vs Intel Core 9 273PE Comparison

The Intel Core 7 350 and Intel Core 9 273PE occupy very different positions in the database. The Core 7 350 is a 6-core, 6-thread mobile processor built on a 3 nm node with a 15 W TDP. The Core 9 273PE is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on a 10 nm node with a 65 W TDP. The benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the nature of the workloads matters significantly. Out of 17 head-to-head tests, the Core 9 273PE wins 15, while the Core 7 350 wins only 2. The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PE is 49845, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 350 averages 17779, which is the 71st percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 9 273PE dominates in almost every multi-threaded and heavy compute test. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 31288, which is 74.3% ahead of the Core 7 350's 8030. This massive gap is also visible in PassMark integer math, where the Core 9 273PE scores 139410, a 75.8% advantage over the Core 7 350's 33734. The data compression test shows a similar pattern: the Core 9 273PE scores 405885, outpacing the Core 7 350's 143123 by 64.7%. These results indicate that the Core 9 273PE is substantially better for tasks that scale with core count and thread count.

Single-core performance is a different story. In the PassMark single-thread test, the Core 7 350 scores 4100, which is 12.3% higher than the Core 9 273PE's 3650. This is the only category where the Core 7 350 shows a clear advantage. However, this does not translate to wins in the Cinebench single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 9 273PE scores 4417, which is 53.7% ahead of the Core 7 350's 2046. The Core 9 273PE also wins Cinebench R20 single-core with 1855 versus 758, a 59.1% lead. The discrepancy between the PassMark single-thread and Cinebench single-core results suggests that the Core 7 350's architecture is better optimized for the specific PassMark workload, while the Core 9 273PE handles the Cinebench rendering workload more efficiently.

Looking at other specific tests, the Core 9 273PE shows consistent leads. In floating-point math, it scores 107884 versus 42809, a 60.3% advantage. The physics test shows a 62.4% lead for the Core 9 273PE, scoring 3120 versus 1173. The random string sorting test gives the Core 9 273PE a 61.8% edge, with scores of 45098 and 17238 respectively. The encryption test has the Core 9 273PE ahead by 51.9%, scoring 22719 versus 10933. The extended instructions test also favors the Core 9 273PE, with a 51.1% lead (24630 versus 12045). The Core 9 273PE wins the find prime numbers test by 47.3%, scoring 203 against 107.

The closest multi-threaded race is in Cinebench R20 multicore, where the Core 9 273PE leads by 59.1%, scoring 13140 versus 5373. The Cinebench R15 multicore test shows a 61.3% lead for the Core 9 273PE, with scores of 3153 and 1220. The Cinebench R15 single-core test has the Core 9 273PE ahead by 34.4%, scoring 445 versus 292. The PassMark multithread test shows a 58.8% lead for the Core 9 273PE, with scores of 36810 and 15170.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score in PassMark?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4100, which is 12.3% higher than the Intel Core 9 273PE's score of 3650.

Q: What is the largest performance gap in the head-to-head data?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark integer math, where the Intel Core 9 273PE scores 139410, which is 75.8% ahead of the Intel Core 7 350's score of 33734.

Q: How does the Core 9 273PE compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The Core 9 273PE has an average score of 49845. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, has an average score of 49796, making the Core 9 273PE 0.1% ahead. The Intel Core i9-13980HX trails at 50398, which is 1.1% behind the Core 9 273PE's score.

Q: Does the Core 7 350 have any benchmark wins against the Core 9 273PE?

A: Yes, the Core 7 350 wins 2 out of 17 tests. Both wins are in the PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests, where it scores 4100 against the Core 9 273PE's 3650.

Q: What memory configurations do these processors support?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel Core 9 273PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Core 7 350 has a single-channel memory bus, and the Core 9 273PE has a dual-channel bus.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 7 350's boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and is fabricated on a 3 nm process node, while the Intel Core 9 273PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is fabricated on a 10 nm process node. Both are manufactured by Intel. The Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, indicating no hyper-threading. The Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, meaning each core supports two threads.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 9 273PE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 9 273PE's larger L3 cache is a significant advantage for workloads that benefit from larger shared pools of data.

The memory interfaces are also different. The Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Core 9 273PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Core 9 273PE also supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 350 does not.

The PCIe capabilities are distinct. The Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). The Core 9 273PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the Core 9 273PE uses UHD Graphics 730.

The market segments and sockets reflect their intended use. The Core 7 350 is a mobile part using the Intel BGA 1516 socket, while the Core 9 273PE is a desktop part using the Intel Socket 1700. Both processors have locked multipliers and are currently in active production. The Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469, and the Core 9 273PE has a launch MSRP of $549.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Core 9 273PE is the stronger processor for virtually all compute-intensive tasks. Its average benchmark score of 49845 is nearly three times the Core 7 350's average of 17779. The Core 9 273PE's 90th percentile ranking versus the Core 7 350's 71st percentile confirms this hierarchy. In multi-threaded workloads, the Core 9 273PE is consistently 50% to 75% faster, as seen in tests like Cinebench R23 multicore, PassMark integer math, and data compression.

The Intel Core 7 350 does have a specific strength: it wins the PassMark single-thread test by 12.3%. This suggests it has a higher peak performance for certain single-threaded applications that align with that benchmark's methodology. However, this advantage does not extend to the Cinebench single-core tests, where the Core 9 273PE leads by over 50%. The Core 7 350's low TDP of 15 W and 3 nm process node make it suitable for power-constrained mobile environments, while the Core 9 273PE's 65 W TDP and desktop socket target a system with less strict power limits.

For a desktop user building a system for rendering, data processing, or heavy multitasking, the Core 9 273PE is the logical choice based on the recorded data. For a mobile user prioritizing battery life and specific single-threaded PassMark performance, the Core 7 350 offers a distinct niche.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors:

• Cores: 6 (Core 7 350) vs 12 (Core 9 273PE)
• Threads: 6 (Core 7 350) vs 24 (Core 9 273PE)
• Base Clock: 1.50 GHz (Core 7 350) vs 2.30 GHz (Core 9 273PE)
• Boost Clock: 4.80 GHz (Core 7 350) vs 5.70 GHz (Core 9 273PE)
• TDP: 15 W (Core 7 350) vs 65 W (Core 9 273PE)
• Socket: Intel BGA 1516 (Core 7 350) vs Intel Socket 1700 (Core 9 273PE)
• Codename: Wildcat Lake (Core 7 350) vs Bartlett Lake (Core 9 273PE)
• Process Node: 3 nm (Core 7 350) vs 10 nm (Core 9 273PE)
• L1 Cache: 192 KB per core (Core 7 350) vs 80 KB per core (Core 9 273PE)
• L2 Cache: 2.5 MB per core (Core 7 350) vs 2 MB per core (Core 9 273PE)
• L3 Cache: 6 MB shared (Core 7 350) vs 36 MB shared (Core 9 273PE)
• Memory Support: DDR5, LPDDR5X (Core 7 350) vs DDR4, DDR5 (Core 9 273PE)
• Memory Bus: Single-channel (Core 7 350) vs Dual-channel (Core 9 273PE)
• Memory Bandwidth: 59.7 GB/s (Core 7 350) vs 89.6 GB/s (Core 9 273PE)
• ECC Memory: No (Core 7 350) vs Yes (Core 9 273PE)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 6 Lanes (Core 7 350) vs Gen 5, 16 Lanes (Core 9 273PE)
• Integrated Graphics: Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) (Core 7 350) vs UHD Graphics 730 (Core 9 273PE)
• Market Segment: Mobile (Core 7 350) vs Desktop (Core 9 273PE)
• Release Date: 2026-04-15 (Core 7 350) vs 2026-03-08 (Core 9 273PE)
• Launch MSRP: $469 (Core 7 350) vs $549 (Core 9 273PE)
• Part Number: SAE3F (Core 7 350) vs SA4QD (Core 9 273PE)

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PE wins in all multi-threaded benchmark categories. This includes Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests, where it leads by 61.3%, 59.1%, and 74.3% respectively. It also dominates PassMark data compression, encryption, extended instructions, find prime numbers, floating-point math, integer math, multithread, physics, and random string sorting. The Core 9 273PE also wins the Cinebench single-core tests, leading by 34.4% in R15, 59.1% in R20, and 53.7% in R23.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins only in the PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests, scoring 4100 versus 3650, a 12.3% lead. This indicates that for applications that rely on the specific instruction mix and workload pattern of the PassMark single-thread test, the Core 7 350 delivers higher throughput. The Core 7 350's advantage is limited to this narrow category, while the Core 9 273PE demonstrates a broader and more substantial performance profile across the rest of the benchmark suite.