Intel Core 7 253PE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 7 253PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Unknown
CPU

Snapdragon X2E-94-100

CORE STATE Glymur
CORE SPECS 18 Cores / 18 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.45 Base / 4.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 9 MB (shared)
MAX TDP
ARCHITECTURE Glymur
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,507
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
354
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
10,449
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,475
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
24,880
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,512
N/A
passmark_data_compression
339,133
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
18,385
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
21,806
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
138
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
80,870
N/A
passmark_integer_math
114,158
N/A
passmark_multithread
29,271
N/A
passmark_physics
1,845
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,777
N/A
passmark_single_thread
3,955
N/A
passmark_singlethread
3,955
N/A

Analysis: Intel Core 7 253PE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PE is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results in the database. Its measured scores span both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 and a single-core score of 3512. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no recorded benchmark entries, so the database cannot assign it a win in any measured test.

The Intel part shows strength in several distinct areas. In PassMark tests, it scores 114158 in integer math, 80870 in floating point math, and 21806 in extended instructions. Data compression reaches 339133, while data encryption hits 18385. Random string sorting completes at 32777. The multi-thread PassMark score is 29271, and the single-thread score is 3955.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100, by contrast, appears in the database with an empty benchmarks array, a zero average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile rank among all CPUs is 50, but this is derived from a lack of measured data, not from demonstrated performance. The database records no wins for either processor in a head-to-head comparison because the head-to-head benchmark field is also empty.

What the data implies is that any comparison between these two parts is currently one-sided. The Intel Core 7 253PE has a full suite of measured results. The Qualcomm part has none. The wins, as far as the database can determine, all go to Intel solely because it is the only one with scores to report.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design approaches. The Intel Core 7 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. It is a desktop part with 10 cores and 20 threads, meaning each core supports two threads. Its base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The thermal design power is 65 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It supports ECC memory and uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. It fits the Intel Socket 1700.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses the Glymur codename and is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It is a mobile part with 18 cores and 18 threads, so no simultaneous multithreading. Its base clock is 4.45 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The die size is 220 mm². The cache layout differs sharply: 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and only 9 MB of shared L3. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X over a triple-channel bus with a bandwidth of 228.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe is Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Adreno X2-90. It uses the Qualcomm BGA 2343 socket.

The process node gap is substantial: 10 nm Intel versus 3 nm TSMC. The Qualcomm part has nearly double the core count, but it runs at a lower boost clock. The Intel part has far more L3 cache, while Qualcomm allocates more L1 per core and a larger L2 per module. Memory bandwidth favors Qualcomm by a wide margin, but Intel offers ECC and broader memory type support. These are two very different design philosophies: Intel prioritizes high single-core frequency and shared cache, while Qualcomm emphasizes core count, memory bandwidth, and a smaller process node.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database provides no head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors. The head-to-head array is empty, and the wins counters for both are zero. This means there is no direct measurement where both parts ran the same test and produced comparable scores.

The only available benchmark data belongs to the Intel Core 7 253PE. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2507 and single-core is 354. In Cinebench R20, multi-core reaches 10449 and single-core 1475. The R23 numbers are 24880 multi-core and 3512 single-core. The PassMark suite provides additional granularity: physics at 1845, prime number finding at 138, and multithread at 29271.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100, the database records zero benchmark scores. There is no Cinebench result, no PassMark result, no Geekbench result, and no other measured performance figure. The average benchmark score is 0, and the percentile rank of 50 appears to be a default value rather than a performance-derived ranking. Its nearest rivals list is empty, so there is no comparative context from the database either.

Because of this asymmetry, any statement about relative performance must be careful. The database shows Intel scores, but it shows nothing for Qualcomm. It would be incorrect to claim the Qualcomm part is slower or faster in any specific test, because no such test exists in the records. The only honest reading is that the Intel part has verified performance numbers, and the Qualcomm part does not.

What the lack of data implies is a gap in coverage. A mobile processor with 18 cores and a 3 nm process may well compete in certain workloads, but the database cannot confirm that. The Intel part, with its 10 cores and 20 threads, has demonstrated results across rendering, math, encryption, and compression tasks.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 253PE is the only processor with measurable performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 and single-core score of 3512 place it in the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 40557. The nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core 5 223PE with an average score of 40585 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H at 40518 with a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Xeon 6357P at 40630 with a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H at 40431 with a delta of 0.3%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Core 7 253PE sits in a tightly packed performance cluster.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no benchmarks, no average score, and no rivals. Its percentile rank of 50 is not supported by any test result. The database cannot recommend it for any workload based on performance because there is no performance evidence.

For users who need verified multi-threaded rendering, the Intel part shows a 24880 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. For single-thread responsiveness, it shows 3512. For encryption and compression, it shows 18385 and 339133 respectively. The Qualcomm part offers architectural promise: 18 cores, a 3 nm node, and 228.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, but the database has no measurements to back that promise.

The verdict from the data is straightforward. The Intel Core 7 253PE is the processor with demonstrated results. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 remains an unmeasured entity. Any buyer or system builder looking at the database would have to treat the Qualcomm part as unverified, while the Intel part has a full profile. The data does not support a performance claim for Qualcomm in any benchmark category.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads.

Q: How do the process nodes compare?

A: The Intel processor is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Qualcomm processor is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE supports ECC memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 does not.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Intel processor has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel bus. The Qualcomm processor has a memory bandwidth of 228.6 GB/s over a triple-channel bus.

Q: Does the database show any head-to-head results between these two?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor has a win count in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 253PE | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 |

|----------------|---------------------|--------------------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 18 |

| Threads | 20 | 18 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 4.45 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | Not recorded |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Glymur |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 220 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 16 MB (per module) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 9 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Triple-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 228.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Adreno X2-90 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2026-04-05 |

| Launch MSRP | $384 | Not recorded |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 87 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 40557 | 0 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 253PE
Snapdragon X2E-94-100
Core Specs
Cores
10
18 +80.0%
Threads
20
18 -10.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.5
4.45 +78.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.5
4.7 -14.5%
Frequency (GHz)
2.5
4.45 +78.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.5
4.7 -14.5%
Multiplier
25
44.5 +78.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
288 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
16 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
33 MB (shared)
9 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
PL1
65 W
PL2
219 W
Architecture
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Glymur
Generation
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Snapdragon X2 (Elite)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Die Size
220 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Triple-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
228.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Qualcomm BGA 2343
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 12 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
12 + 6
E-Core Frequency
3.6 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 80 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Adreno X2-90
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$384
Part Number
SA4QE
X2E94100
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
View Core 7 253PE Details View Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Details