Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do their clock speeds compare?

A: The Core 7 251TE has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core i5-14501E has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz but a lower boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference between the two?

A: The Core 7 251TE is rated at a 45 W TDP, while the Core i5-14501E has a 65 W TDP. Both use the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 7 251TE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i5-14501E does not have a bandwidth figure in the database.

Q: How does the integrated graphics compare?

A: Both processors integrate the UHD Graphics 770. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Q: What is the production status and release date for each?

A: Both are listed as Active in production. The Core 7 251TE was released on 2025-01-12, and the Core i5-14501E was released on 2024-06-30.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251TE dominates the performance comparison based on the recorded data. Its benchmark suite shows substantial multi-core strength, reflected in scores like 25,518 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 10,717 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. The single-core results are also strong: 3,602 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1,512 in Cinebench R20 single-core. PassMark tests further confirm its breadth, with 125,739 in integer math, 85,607 in floating point math, and 30,022 in multithreaded performance.

The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 versus all CPUs indicates it sits at the median of the recorded population, but the absence of direct test scores means the data cannot substantiate any specific workload victory for this chip. The Core 7 251TE, by contrast, holds an 88th percentile rank, placing it well above the median.

Where the i5-14501E might appeal is in its higher base clock of 3.30 GHz compared to the 251TE's 1.40 GHz. In lightly threaded, latency-sensitive tasks that rely on base frequency rather than boost frequency, the i5 could theoretically hold an advantage, but the database provides no benchmark results to confirm this. The 251TE's boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher than the i5's 5.20 GHz, suggests the 251TE has the upper hand when all cores are not loaded and turbo is engaged.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake-R, which belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Both are fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, and both have a die size of 215 mm².

The core counts diverge sharply. The 251TE packs 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that suggests a hybrid design with a mix of performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact core type breakdown. The i5-14501E is a 6-core, 12-thread part, a conventional layout for a mainstream desktop chip.

Cache allocation differs as well. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, but the shared L3 cache is larger on the 251TE at 36 MB versus 24 MB on the i5-14501E. This 12 MB difference in shared cache could influence workloads that benefit from larger pooled data, such as database queries or compilation tasks.

Both processors support ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation or entry-server use cases. They also share the same PCIe implementation: Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. The integrated graphics are identical, UHD Graphics 770, so visual output capabilities are equivalent.

The 251TE is marked as part of the "Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)" generation, while the i5-14501E is "Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)". The 251TE's newer release date of 2025-01-12, compared to the i5's 2024-06-30, indicates a later introduction to the market.

Specification Differences

The most glaring difference is in core and thread counts: 24 cores and 32 threads for the 251TE versus 6 cores and 12 threads for the i5-14501E.

Base clocks differ by 1.90 GHz: the i5-14501E starts at 3.30 GHz, while the 251TE idles at 1.40 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the 251TE reaching 5.40 GHz and the i5-14501E reaching 5.20 GHz, a 0.20 GHz gap.

The TDP ratings show the 251TE at 45 W, which is 20 W lower than the i5-14501E's 65 W. This is notable because the 251TE drives far more cores at a lower power envelope, while the i5 consumes more power but delivers fewer threads.

The L3 cache is 36 MB on the 251TE and 24 MB on the i5-14501E. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the 251TE at 89.6 GB/s; the i5-14501E has no bandwidth figure in the database.

The release dates differ by roughly six months, with the i5-14501E appearing on 2024-06-30 and the 251TE on 2025-01-12. The 251TE has a launch MSRP of $384; the i5-14501E has no launch MSRP recorded.

The part numbers are distinct: SRQAXQ5ZG for the 251TE and Q49HSRNJM for the i5-14501E. Both use the same socket, memory types, memory bus width, PCIe configuration, integrated graphics, and ECC support.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the i5-14501E has no individual benchmark scores at all. The comparison therefore rests on the 251TE's recorded performance and the i5's absence of data.

The 251TE's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,518 indicates a high-throughput part. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,717 and R15 multi-core score of 2,572 follow the same pattern. Single-core results are similarly strong: 3,602 in R23, 1,512 in R20, and 362 in R15.

PassMark tests on the 251TE show 334,399 in data compression, 22,176 in data encryption, 16,974 in extended instructions, and 140 in find prime numbers. The floating point math score of 85,607 and integer math score of 125,739 both point to robust arithmetic throughput. The multithreaded score of 30,022, physics score of 1,938, and random string sorting score of 39,643 round out the picture.

The i5-14501E has no such entries. Its average benchmark score is 0 in the database, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The percentile rank of 50 versus all CPUs is the only performance-related metric available, and it is a general placement rather than a specific test result.

When comparing the 251TE to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is nearly tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, which has an average score of 41,621 and a delta of 0.1%. It is also close to the Intel Core i7-14650HX at 41,576 with a 0.2% delta. The 251TE trails the Intel Core i7-12850HX by 0.3% and the Intel Core i7-14700T by 0.6%, based on average scores of 41,779 and 41,914 respectively. These small deltas indicate the 251TE sits in a tightly contested performance band, but the i5-14501E is not part of that group.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 251TE is the clear choice for workloads that demand parallel throughput. Its 24 cores, 32 threads, and 36 MB of L3 cache give it a structural advantage that the benchmark results confirm. The recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores are strong across both multi-core and single-core tests, and its 88th percentile rank places it well above the median CPU.

The Intel Core i5-14501E offers no recorded benchmark data. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are a smaller configuration, and its higher base clock of 3.30 GHz may help in latency-sensitive scenarios, but the database does not provide any test scores to validate that. Its 50th percentile rank is exactly median, indicating it sits in the middle of the recorded CPU population.

For a user selecting between these two, the data points entirely to the 251TE. It delivers more cores, more threads, more L3 cache, a higher boost clock, a lower TDP, and a full suite of benchmark results that demonstrate its capability. The i5-14501E has no performance evidence in the database, so any claim of its superiority cannot be supported by the recorded measurements.

The 251TE also holds the advantage in memory bandwidth, with 89.6 GB/s recorded, and it carries a launch MSRP of $384. The i5-14501E has no MSRP listed, so a direct price comparison is not possible from the data.

The release timeline favors the 251TE as the more recent part, and its production status is Active alongside the i5. Both share the same socket, memory support, PCIe lanes, and integrated graphics, which means platform-level compatibility is similar. The decision, based strictly on the database, is unambiguous: the Core 7 251TE is the processor with the demonstrated performance, and the Core i5-14501E lacks any benchmark confirmation to compete.