Intel Core 7 250H vs Intel Xeon 6349P Comparison

The Intel Core 7 250H and the Intel Xeon 6349P are two very different processors that happen to share the same Raptor Lake architecture. The data in the database shows a clear split: the Core 7 250H is a mobile part with a high core count, while the Xeon 6349P is a desktop-class server/workstation chip with fewer cores but much higher clock speeds. Their benchmark profiles reflect this divide, with the Core 7 winning the majority of tests while the Xeon takes the single-thread crown.

The Verdict

The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core 7 250H is the better choice for users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput in a mobile form factor. It wins 10 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests, including decisive victories in Cinebench R15 multi-core (42.5% ahead) and PassMark integer math (20.2% ahead). Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a substantial parallel workload advantage over the Xeon’s 6 cores and 12 threads. The Core 7 also leads in PassMark data encryption by 12.1%, PassMark find prime numbers by 17.8%, and PassMark physics by 29.5%, making it a stronger option for encryption tasks, mathematical workloads, and physics simulations.

The Intel Xeon 6349P, however, is the pick for single-threaded performance and workloads that scale poorly across cores. It wins 7 tests, including Cinebench R23 single-core by 37.6% and PassMark single-thread by 8.4%. Its boost clock of 5.70 GHz, versus the Core 7’s 5.40 GHz, directly contributes to these wins. The Xeon also excels in Cinebench R23 multi-core (24.5% ahead) and PassMark extended instructions (15.2% ahead), which suggests its higher per-core efficiency can overcome the Core 7’s core deficit in certain sustained workloads. For a server or workstation environment where ECC memory support is required, the Xeon is the only option of the two.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Xeon 6349P has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon 6349P is faster. It wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 4.2%, Cinebench R23 single-core by 37.6%, and PassMark single-thread by 8.4%.

Q: Does the Xeon 6349P support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Xeon 6349P has ECC memory support. The Intel Core 7 250H does not.

Q: What is the difference in their average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has an average benchmark score of 35728, while the Intel Xeon 6349P has an average score of 34890. The Core 7 sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Xeon sits at the 84th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon 6349P has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 7 250H’s boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Xeon 6349P has 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel’s 10 nm process node and use the Raptor Lake architecture, but they target different market segments. The Intel Core 7 250H comes from the Raptor Lake-H family and is classified under the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It is designed for mobile computing, as indicated by its Intel BGA 1744 socket and 45 W TDP. The Intel Xeon 6349P, in contrast, belongs to the Raptor Lake-R family and is part of the Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has a 95 W TDP, reflecting its server/workstation positioning.

The core configurations differ significantly. The Core 7 250H packs 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Xeon 6349P offers only 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the Core 7 a clear parallel processing advantage. The L2 cache also differs: the Core 7 has 2 MB per core, while the Xeon has 1.25 MB per core. Both share an 80 KB per core L1 cache, but the Core 7 has more total L3 cache at 24 MB shared, versus 18 MB shared for the Xeon.

The integrated graphics are a major differentiator. The Core 7 250H includes Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Xeon 6349P has no integrated graphics. The Xeon compensates with ECC memory support, which the Core 7 lacks, and a wider PCIe configuration: 16 lanes of Gen 5 (CPU only) versus 8 lanes for the Core 7. The Xeon also has a measurable die size of 163 mm², while the Core 7’s die size is not recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show several direct contrasts. The Intel Core 7 250H has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the Intel Xeon 6349P starts at 3.60 GHz base and boosts to 5.70 GHz. The Xeon’s higher clocks are a key factor in its single-thread wins. The TDP differs substantially: 45 W for the Core 7 versus 95 W for the Xeon, reflecting the mobile versus server/workstation design goals.

The memory support is identical in type (DDR4, DDR5) and bus width (dual-channel), but ECC support is exclusive to the Xeon. The PCIe lanes differ, with the Xeon offering 16 Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) versus 8 for the Core 7. The sockets are different, which means they are not interchangeable in a system. The integrated graphics are present only on the Core 7. The launch dates differ, with the Core 7 released on 2024-12-17 and the Xeon on 2025-02-23. The launch MSRP is $502 for the Core 7 and $509 for the Xeon. Both processors have locked multipliers and are currently listed as Active production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The Intel Core 7 250H wins 10 of them, while the Intel Xeon 6349P wins 7. The largest victory for the Core 7 is in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it scores 3147 against the Xeon’s 2209, a 42.5% advantage. This test heavily favors the Core 7’s 14-core configuration. The Core 7 also wins Cinebench R20 multi-core by 5.3% (9697 vs 9208) and Cinebench R20 single-core by 5.3% (1368 vs 1299), showing a consistent lead in that particular Cinebench version.

In PassMark tests, the Core 7 dominates several workloads. It leads data encryption by 12.1% (18206 vs 16239), find prime numbers by 17.8% (106 vs 90), floating point math by 5.3% (65094 vs 61796), integer math by 20.2% (99100 vs 82443), multithread by 4.8% (27030 vs 25793), physics by 29.5% (1824 vs 1408), and random string sorting by 9.9% (34136 vs 31056). These results indicate the Core 7 is broadly stronger in integer-heavy and parallel workloads.

The Xeon 6349P counters with its own set of wins. The most striking is Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 21924 versus the Core 7’s 16561, a 24.5% advantage. This is surprising given the core count difference, but the Xeon’s higher clocks and per-core efficiency appear to overcome the Core 7’s extra cores in this specific test. The Xeon also wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 37.6% (3095 vs 1931) and Cinebench R15 single-core by 4.2% (311 vs 298). In PassMark, the Xeon wins data compression by 1.1% (306774 vs 303269), extended instructions by 15.2% (20426 vs 17318), and single-thread by 8.4% (4528 vs 4148).

The single-thread results are consistent with the clock speed difference. The Xeon’s 5.70 GHz boost clock versus the Core 7’s 5.40 GHz gives it a measurable edge in latency-sensitive tasks. The extended instructions win suggests the Xeon handles complex instruction sets more efficiently, likely due to its higher per-core resources. The data compression result is nearly a tie, with the Xeon edging ahead by just 1.1%, indicating comparable performance in that workload.

The overall average benchmark scores place the Core 7 slightly higher at 35728 versus 34890 for the Xeon, a difference of 2.4%. Both processors sit near the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with the Core 7 at 85 and the Xeon at 84. The nearest rivals for the Core 7 include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (avg score 35719, 0% delta), Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (35670, 0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802, -0.2% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (35909, -0.5% delta). For the Xeon, the nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 150 (34881, 0% delta), Intel Core 7 253PTE (34962, -0.2% delta), Intel Core i7-13800H (34988, -0.3% delta), and Intel Core i9-12900HX (35003, -0.3% delta). These rival comparisons show both processors are competitive within their respective performance tiers.