Intel Core 7 250H vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Intel Core 7 250H and Intel Core i9-14901TE are both 45-watt Intel processors built on the Raptor Lake architecture, yet they target different market segments and deliver distinct performance characteristics. The 250H is a mobile processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, while the 14901TE is a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. Both share the same 10 nm process node and are produced by Intel. The database contains benchmark results for the 250H, but the 14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores, which shapes the comparison significantly.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 250H boosts to 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 250H does not.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors use?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 7 250H and Intel Core i9-14901TE both derive from the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The 250H carries the codename Raptor Lake-H and is classified under the Core 7 series, while the 14901TE uses the codename Raptor Lake-R and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. Both are fabricated on the same 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry.

The most significant architectural divergence lies in core configuration. The 250H packs 14 cores and 20 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores typical of mobile processors. The 14901TE offers 8 cores and 16 threads, which suggests a more uniform core layout suited for desktop workloads. This core count difference directly impacts multithreaded performance potential.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. Each core on both processors has 80 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache. The shared L3 cache, however, favors the 14901TE with 36 MB compared to 24 MB on the 250H. This additional L3 cache can benefit workloads with large working sets or frequent data reuse.

The PCIe configurations show another architectural distinction. The 250H provides Gen 5 support with 8 lanes from the CPU. The 14901TE doubles this with 16 Gen 5 lanes, enabling more expansion options for desktop systems. Both processors have locked multipliers, preventing overclocking.

Memory support is similar, with both accepting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. The 14901TE adds ECC memory support, a feature absent from the 250H. This positions the desktop chip for reliability-focused applications such as small servers or workstations.

The 14901TE has a recorded die size of 257 mm², while the 250H has no die size data in the database. Both processors are currently marked as Active in production status. The 250H released on December 17, 2024, while the 14901TE released on June 30, 2024.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 7 250H and the Intel Core i9-14901TE. The 14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. This absence of direct measurement data means the comparison relies on the 250H's standalone benchmark results and the architectural differences between the two processors.

The 250H delivers strong single-thread performance in Cinebench tests. It scores 298 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1368 in R20 single-core, and 1931 in R23 single-core. These results place it in the upper range for mobile processors. The 14901TE, with its higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz, could theoretically edge out the 250H in single-threaded tasks, but no measurements confirm this.

Multithreaded results for the 250H show substantial capability. Cinebench R15 multicore yields 3147, R20 multicore yields 9697, and R23 multicore yields 16561. These scores reflect the advantage of 14 cores and 20 threads. The 14901TE has fewer cores, which likely reduces its multicore throughput, though the lack of benchmark data prevents a precise comparison.

PassMark tests provide additional insight into the 250H's workload-specific strengths. The processor scores 303269 in data compression, 18206 in data encryption, and 17318 in extended instructions. Integer math reaches 99100, floating point math reaches 65094, and multithread performance scores 27030. Single-thread performance measures 4148, while physics scores 1824. Random string sorting completes at 34136, and prime number finding scores 106.

These PassMark figures indicate balanced performance across diverse computational tasks. The data compression and integer math scores are particularly strong, suggesting efficiency in data-heavy operations. The 14901TE has no equivalent measurements, leaving its performance profile unquantified in the database.

The 250H holds an average benchmark score of 35728 and sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 with an average score of 35719 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H with 35670 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 with 35802 and a delta of -0.2 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X with 35909 and a delta of -0.5 percent. These deltas show the 250H performs within a tight band around these competitors, with differences under 1 percent.

The 14901TE has a percentile ranking of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded measurements. This percentile value indicates the database places it at the median position by default, but without benchmark data, this ranking carries no analytical weight.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. Core count stands as the most prominent distinction: the 250H provides 14 cores versus 8 cores on the 14901TE. Thread counts follow the same pattern, with 20 threads on the 250H and 16 threads on the 14901TE.

Base clocks differ slightly. The 250H runs at 2.50 GHz, while the 14901TE runs at 2.30 GHz. Boost clocks reverse this order, with the 14901TE reaching 5.50 GHz and the 250H reaching 5.40 GHz.

Socket compatibility separates the two clearly. The 250H uses Intel BGA 1744, a ball-grid array for soldered mobile installations. The 14901TE uses Intel Socket 1700, a land-grid array for socketed desktop motherboards.

L3 cache capacity favors the 14901TE with 36 MB shared, while the 250H offers 24 MB shared. PCIe lane count also differs: the 250H supports 8 Gen 5 lanes, and the 14901TE supports 16 Gen 5 lanes.

ECC memory support exists only on the 14901TE. The integrated graphics differ as well, with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the 250H and UHD Graphics 770 on the 14901TE.

The 14901TE has a documented die size of 257 mm², while the 250H lacks this data point. Market segments diverge, with the 250H classified as Mobile and the 14901TE as Desktop. Release dates place the 14901TE earlier at June 30, 2024, and the 250H later at December 17, 2024. The 250H has a launch MSRP of $502, while the 14901TE has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear scenario: the Intel Core 7 250H has extensive benchmark coverage, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has none. This asymmetry means any verdict must rely on the 250H's measured performance and the architectural specifications of the 14901TE.

The 250H demonstrates strong performance across all recorded benchmarks, holding the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its 14-core configuration delivers robust multithreaded results, and its single-thread scores place it among capable performers. The 14901TE, with 8 cores and a 5.50 GHz boost clock, likely excels in single-threaded workloads but cannot match the 250H's multicore throughput based on core count alone.

Users who require heavy parallel processing should favor the 250H. Its 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16561 indicate strong rendering and productivity capability. The 14901TE suits desktop systems needing ECC memory support and more PCIe lanes for expansion, though its performance remains unverified.

The 250H also holds the advantage of being a current mobile platform with active production status and a recorded launch price. The 14901TE offers a desktop form factor with a larger L3 cache, which may benefit certain single-threaded or cache-sensitive applications, but no benchmark data confirms this.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 250H wins in multithreaded performance scenarios. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a clear structural advantage over the 8-core, 16-thread 14901TE. Benchmark results for the 250H show strong multicore scores across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, as well as PassMark multithread tests. The 250H also wins in portability, as its BGA socket and mobile classification suit laptops and compact systems. Its Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units likely outperforms the UHD Graphics 770 in integrated graphics tasks, though no direct comparison exists.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE wins in single-threaded potential due to its 5.50 GHz boost clock, which exceeds the 250H's 5.40 GHz. It also wins in cache capacity with 36 MB of L3 cache versus 24 MB, a factor that can improve performance in cache-heavy workloads. The 14901TE wins in ECC memory support, making it suitable for data-integrity-sensitive applications. Its 16 Gen 5 PCIe lanes double the 250H's 8 lanes, providing greater expansion capability for desktop builds. The desktop socket format also offers easier upgrade and replacement compared to the soldered mobile package.

For users prioritizing parallel compute, the 250H stands as the measured choice. For users needing ECC, more PCIe lanes, or maximum cache, the 14901TE presents the architectural option, albeit without benchmark validation. The database currently supports the 250H with empirical evidence, while the 14901TE remains an unmeasured specification sheet.