Intel Core 7 250H vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison
Intel Core 7 250H
Core i7-14701TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 7 250H vs Intel Core i7-14701TE
Intel Core 7 250H and Intel Core i7-14701TE are both 45 W parts from Intel’s Raptor Lake Refresh generation, but they target different sockets and market segments. The Core 7 250H is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 1744, while the Core i7-14701TE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. Benchmark data shows a clear split: the Core 7 250H wins 13 of 17 head-to-head tests, while the Core i7-14701TE takes 4. The average benchmark score for the Core 7 250H is 35728, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Core i7-14701TE averages 26013, at the 78th percentile.
Where Each One Wins
The Core 7 250H dominates in multi-threaded workloads that scale with core count and memory bandwidth. Its 14 cores and 20 threads give it a substantial lead in Cinebench R15 multicore (3147 vs 1716, 83.4% ahead), Cinebench R20 multicore (9697 vs 7154, 35.5% ahead), and PassMark multithread (27030 vs 20042, 34.9% ahead). The mobile chip also excels in integer-heavy and encryption tasks: PassMark integer math shows 99100 vs 65792 (50.6% ahead), and data encryption shows 18206 vs 11699 (55.6% ahead). Data compression favors the Core 7 250H by 37.5% (303269 vs 220520), and random string sorting is 50% higher (34136 vs 22760). Single-thread performance on the Core 7 250H is also strong in PassMark, with a 57.3% lead (4148 vs 2637).
The Core i7-14701TE wins in specific workloads where its higher boost clock and larger L3 cache matter more than raw core count. It takes Cinebench R23 singlecore with 2405 vs 1931 (19.7% ahead) and Cinebench R23 multicore with 17035 vs 16561 (2.8% ahead). The desktop part also leads in PassMark find prime numbers (143 vs 106, 25.9% ahead) and PassMark physics (1860 vs 1824, 1.9% ahead). These wins suggest the Core i7-14701TE handles latency-sensitive, cache-dependent tasks better, despite having fewer cores.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and are built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. The Core 7 250H comes from the Raptor Lake-H codename, while the Core i7-14701TE uses Raptor Lake-R. Both are part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The mobile chip runs a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 5.40 GHz; the desktop chip runs 2.10 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost.
Cache configuration differs significantly. Both assign 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, but the Core 7 250H has 24 MB of shared L3 while the Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3. The desktop part’s larger L3 cache likely explains its wins in the R23 singlecore and find prime numbers tests. The Core i7-14701TE also has a die size of 257 mm², though no die size is listed for the Core 7 250H.
Memory support is identical: both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. ECC memory is supported only on the Core i7-14701TE; the Core 7 250H does not support ECC. PCIe lanes differ: the Core 7 250H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i7-14701TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 7 250H uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, the Core i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 7 250H boosts to 5.40 GHz. The Intel Core i7-14701TE boosts to 5.20 GHz.
Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?
A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 250H does not.
Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 250H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core 7 250H wins 13 of 17 head-to-head tests. The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins 4.
Q: What are the market segments for these two parts?
A: The Intel Core 7 250H is a mobile processor. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is a desktop processor.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Core 7 250H | Intel Core i7-14701TE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cores | 14 | 8 |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 5.20 GHz |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Codename | Raptor Lake-H | Raptor Lake-R |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |
| Die Size | Not listed | 257 mm² |
| ECC Memory | No | Yes |
| PCIe | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | 2024-12-17 | 2024-06-30 |
| Launch MSRP | $502 | Not listed |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The largest win for the Intel Core 7 250H comes in Cinebench R15 multicore, where it scores 3147 against 1716, a margin of 83.4%. This test demonstrates the scaling advantage of 14 cores over 8 cores in a heavily threaded render workload. PassMark single thread also shows a decisive gap: 4148 vs 2637, a 57.3% lead for the mobile part. This result is notable because the Core i7-14701TE has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23 (2405 vs 1931), yet the Core 7 250H wins PassMark single thread by a wide margin. The discrepancy suggests the two suites measure different aspects of single-thread performance, with PassMark favoring the Core 7 250H’s boost behavior.
Data encryption is another standout for the Core 7 250H, with 18206 vs 11699, a 55.6% advantage. Integer math follows at 50.6% (99100 vs 65792), and random string sorting is exactly 50% higher (34136 vs 22760). Floating point math shows a 29.6% lead (65094 vs 50219), and extended instructions are 20.6% ahead (17318 vs 14354). Data compression delivers 303269 vs 220520, a 37.5% margin. The Core 7 250H also wins Cinebench R20 multicore by 35.5% (9697 vs 7154) and Cinebench R20 singlecore by 35.4% (1368 vs 1010). PassMark multithread rounds out the wins with 27030 vs 20042, a 34.9% edge.
The Intel Core i7-14701TE’s biggest win is Cinebench R23 singlecore, where it scores 2405 against 1931, a 19.7% advantage. This result aligns with its larger 33 MB L3 cache and higher single-core efficiency in that specific benchmark. The desktop chip also wins Cinebench R23 multicore, but by a slim 2.8% margin (17035 vs 16561), despite having 6 fewer cores. PassMark find prime numbers shows a 25.9% lead for the Core i7-14701TE (143 vs 106), and PassMark physics is essentially tied, with the desktop part ahead by 1.9% (1860 vs 1824).
The head-to-head data indicates a tradeoff between raw throughput and cache-sensitive single-thread performance. The Core 7 250H delivers higher aggregate throughput in most workloads, particularly those involving encryption, compression, and integer math. The Core i7-14701TE counters in Cinebench R23 and prime number calculations, where its larger cache and higher per-core efficiency compensate for fewer cores. The overall percentile ranking reflects this: the Core 7 250H sits at the 85th percentile, while the Core i7-14701TE sits at the 78th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core 7 250H include AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (0% delta), Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (-0.2% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (-0.5% delta). For the Core i7-14701TE, nearest rivals are AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (-0.4% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (0.5% delta), and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (-0.7% delta).