Intel Core 7 250H vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core 7 250H and the Intel Core i5-14401E is split across six recorded Cinebench tests, with the mobile processor taking four wins and the desktop processor taking two. The margin of victory differs sharply by workload type. In the older Cinebench R15 and R20 suites, the Core 7 250H dominates. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14401E reverses the outcome with substantial single-core and multicore leads.

Starting with Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core 7 250H scores 3147 against 1830 for the i5-14401E, a 72% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire head-to-head set. The single-core R15 result is closer: 298 versus 258, a 15.5% lead for the Core 7 250H. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore test shows 9697 for the Core 7 250H versus 7627 for the i5-14401E, a 27.1% margin. The R20 single-core test repeats the exact same 27.1% delta, with scores of 1368 and 1076 respectively. These four tests establish a clear pattern: in the R15 and R20 suites, the Core 7 250H is faster in both single-threaded and multi-threaded execution.

The picture flips in Cinebench R23. The i5-14401E scores 18161 in multicore against 16561 for the Core 7 250H, a lead of 8.8%. In single-core R23, the i5-14401E reaches 2564 versus 1931, a 24.7% advantage. The R23 single-core gap is the second-largest margin in the dataset, trailing only the R15 multicore result. This suggests that the i5-14401E scales better in newer rendering workloads, particularly in single-threaded performance where it outpaces the Core 7 250H by nearly a quarter.

Beyond the head-to-head entries, the database contains additional PassMark results for the Core 7 250H only, including a multithread score of 27030, single-thread score of 4148, integer math of 99100, floating point math of 65094, data compression of 303269, and data encryption of 18206. No corresponding PassMark figures exist for the i5-14401E in this dataset, so those cannot be compared directly. The average benchmark score for the Core 7 250H is 35728, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The i5-14401E carries an average benchmark score of 5253, at the 60th percentile. This large difference in average scores is driven by the broader benchmark set recorded for the Core 7 250H, which includes many PassMark tests that are absent for the i5-14401E.

The nearest rivals for the Core 7 250H include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 with an average score of 35719 and a delta of 0%, the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 35670 with a 0.2% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 at 35802 with a -0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X at 35909 with a -0.5% delta. For the i5-14401E, the nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 at 5259 with a -0.1% delta, the Intel Core i7-11700B at 5241 with a 0.2% delta, the Intel Core i9-10850K at 5240 with a 0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i5-13400T at 5210 with a 0.8% delta. These reference points show that the Core 7 250H competes in a much higher performance tier overall, while the i5-14401E sits in a lower tier despite its R23 wins.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload and platform. The Intel Core 7 250H is the stronger processor in four of the six direct comparisons, with particularly large margins in Cinebench R15 multicore (72%) and Cinebench R20 multicore and single-core (27.1% each). It also holds a 15.5% single-core lead in R15. The i5-14401E wins only in Cinebench R23, but its wins are meaningful: 8.8% in multicore and 24.7% in single-core.

For users prioritizing the latest Cinebench R23 rendering results, the i5-14401E delivers higher scores in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. For users working with older Cinebench versions or relying on the broader PassMark suite, the Core 7 250H shows far higher average scores and a higher percentile ranking (85th versus 60th). The Core 7 250H also carries a launch MSRP of $502, which is recorded in the database; the i5-14401E has no recorded launch MSRP.

The choice depends on which benchmark set matters more. The i5-14401E is a desktop processor with a 65W TDP, 6 cores, and 12 threads. The Core 7 250H is a mobile processor with a 45W TDP, 14 cores, and 20 threads. The higher core count of the Core 7 250H does not translate into a win in Cinebench R23, where the i5-14401E leads, but it does contribute to the large R15 multicore margin. The i5-14401E is the better option strictly for R23 performance. The Core 7 250H is the better option across the majority of recorded tests and in overall average score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark tests?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H wins four of the six head-to-head tests: Cinebench R15 multicore, R15 single-core, R20 multicore, and R20 single-core. The Intel Core i5-14401E wins the remaining two: Cinebench R23 multicore and R23 single-core.

Q: What is the largest performance gap in the head-to-head results?

A: The largest gap is in Cinebench R15 multicore, where the Intel Core 7 250H scores 3147 versus 1830 for the Intel Core i5-14401E, a 72% advantage.

Q: In which test does the Intel Core i5-14401E have its biggest win?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has its biggest win in Cinebench R23 single-core, scoring 2564 against 1931 for the Intel Core 7 250H, a 24.7% lead.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R20 multicore?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H scores 9697, while the Intel Core i5-14401E scores 7627. The Core 7 250H leads by 27.1%.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H ranks at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14401E ranks at the 60th percentile.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has an average benchmark score of 35728. The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both have a base clock of 2.50 GHz, but the boost clock differs: the Core 7 250H reaches 5.40 GHz, while the i5-14401E reaches 4.70 GHz. The thermal design power also differs, with the Core 7 250H at 45W and the i5-14401E at 65W.

The sockets are different as well. The Core 7 250H uses Intel BGA 1744, while the i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segments reflect this: the Core 7 250H is a mobile processor, and the i5-14401E is a desktop processor. The PCIe configurations differ, with the Core 7 250H supporting Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only) and the i5-14401E supporting Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ: the Core 7 250H uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the i5-14401E uses UHD Graphics 730. The i5-14401E supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 250H does not. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. The release dates differ, with the Core 7 250H released on 2024-12-17 and the i5-14401E on 2024-06-30. The Core 7 250H has a recorded launch MSRP of $502; the i5-14401E has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation label, and both are built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The codenames differ: the Core 7 250H uses Raptor Lake-H, while the i5-14401E uses Raptor Lake-R. The die size is recorded only for the i5-14401E at 215 mm²; no die size is recorded for the Core 7 250H.

The cache configurations differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 2 MB per core for the Core 7 250H and 1.25 MB per core for the i5-14401E. The shared L3 cache is 24 MB for the Core 7 250H and 20 MB for the i5-14401E. No v-cache or total L3 values are recorded for either.

The core and thread counts point to a hybrid design difference in practice: the Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both are active production parts from Intel, and neither has a recorded transistor count. The part numbers are SRQ6UQ5MK for the Core 7 250H and Q49JSRNJS for the i5-14401E.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 250H wins in Cinebench R15 multicore, R15 single-core, R20 multicore, and R20 single-core. Its R15 multicore score of 3147 is 72% higher than the i5-14401E's 1830, indicating a major advantage in workloads that reflect that benchmark generation. The 27.1% leads in both R20 tests reinforce this pattern. The Core 7 250H also has the higher core count (14 versus 6), higher boost clock (5.40 GHz versus 4.70 GHz), and a lower TDP (45W versus 65W). Its average benchmark score of 35728 and 85th percentile ranking are far above the i5-14401E's 5253 and 60th percentile. The Core 7 250H is the winner in the majority of recorded tests and in overall standing.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in Cinebench R23 multicore and R23 single-core. Its R23 multicore score of 18161 is 8.8% higher than the Core 7 250H's 16561, and its R23 single-core score of 2564 is 24.7% higher than 1931. This makes the i5-14401E the better performer specifically in the newest Cinebench generation recorded in this dataset. It also supports ECC memory, which the Core 7 250H does not, and it provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) compared to 8 on the Core 7 250H. For users running R23 workloads or needing ECC support and more PCIe lanes, the i5-14401E is the recorded choice.