Intel Core 7 250H vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison

The Intel Core 7 250H and Intel Core 7 253PTE are two 10nm Intel processors that target different platforms: the 250H is a mobile chip with 14 cores, while the 253PTE is a desktop chip with 10 cores. Despite the core count difference, both have 20 threads and a 45W TDP. Benchmark data shows the 250H wins 12 of 17 head-to-head tests, but the 253PTE takes the newer Cinebench R23 and integer/FP math workloads. This analysis breaks down the numbers, architecture, and use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win belongs to the 250H in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it scores 3147 against the 253PTE's 2144, a 46.8% advantage. That is a massive gap for a multi-threaded workload, and it sets the tone for the 250H's dominance in several older rendering tests. The 250H also wins Cinebench R20 multi-core by 8.5% (9697 vs 8935) and R20 single-core by the same margin (1368 vs 1261). In Passmark tests, the 250H leads in data compression by 9.9% (303269 vs 275828), data encryption by 17.5% (18206 vs 15500), find prime numbers by 29.3% (106 vs 82), physics by 38.4% (1824 vs 1318), random string sorting by 20.9% (34136 vs 28227), and multithread by 8% (27030 vs 25031). It also edges out the 253PTE in extended instructions by 1.3% (17318 vs 17099) and in Passmark single-thread by 9.3% (4148 vs 3794).

The 253PTE, however, strikes back in Cinebench R23. It wins single-core by 35.7% (3003 vs 1931) and multi-core by 22.2% (21276 vs 16561). Those are substantial margins, especially the single-core result, which suggests a different architectural tuning. The 253PTE also wins Passmark integer math by 17.1% (119552 vs 99100) and floating-point math by 3.1% (67209 vs 65094). Its only other win is Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 302 vs 298, a 1.3% edge.

The overall win count is 12 for the 250H and 5 for the 253PTE. The 250H's average benchmark score is 35728, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the 253PTE averages 34962 and sits in the 84th percentile. The 250H's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 with a delta of 0%, meaning they are effectively tied. The 253PTE's nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-13800H, which is 0.1% higher. These context points show that both chips are competitive within their respective performance tiers.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's 10nm process and use the same L1 (80 KB per core) and L2 (2 MB per core) cache structure. The core counts differ: the 250H has 14 cores, the 253PTE has 10, yet both expose 20 threads. The 250H is based on Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-H) and belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, while the 253PTE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture and generation. The L3 cache is larger on the 253PTE: 33 MB shared versus 24 MB on the 250H. This extra cache may explain the 253PTE's strong Cinebench R23 results despite fewer cores.

Memory support is identical in type (DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel), but the 253PTE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the 250H does not specify a figure. The 253PTE also supports ECC memory, which the 250H does not. PCIe connectivity differs: the 250H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the 253PTE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are different as well: the 250H has Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the 253PTE has UHD Graphics 730. The 250H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and is a mobile part, whereas the 253PTE uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop part. Base clocks are 2.50 GHz for the 250H and 1.80 GHz for the 253PTE, but both boost to 5.40 GHz. The 250H was released on December 17, 2024, and the 253PTE on March 8, 2026.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The 250H has 14 cores, while the 253PTE has 10 cores. Both have 20 threads.

Q: Which has higher single-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The 253PTE wins by 35.7%, scoring 3003 versus the 250H's 1931.

Q: Which supports ECC memory?

A: The 253PTE supports ECC, while the 250H does not.

Q: Which has more PCIe lanes?

A: The 253PTE has 16 lanes, the 250H has 8 lanes, both Gen 5.

Q: Which has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The 250H averages 35728, the 253PTE averages 34962, a difference of about 2.2%.

Q: Which has a larger L3 cache?

A: The 253PTE has 33 MB shared L3, the 250H has 24 MB.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 250H | Intel Core 7 253PTE |

|---------------|--------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 14 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Raptor Lake Refresh | Bartlett Lake |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB shared | 33 MB shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe Lanes | 8 (Gen 5) | 16 (Gen 5) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-12-17 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | $502 | $384 |

| Part Number | SRQ6UQ5MK | SA4QK |

Both chips share the same boost clock (5.40 GHz), TDP (45W), process node (10nm), foundry (Intel), L1/L2 cache per core, memory type (DDR4/DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), and multiplier lock (unlocked false).

The Verdict

The data does not crown a single winner. The 250H wins more head-to-head tests (12 vs 5), has a higher average benchmark score (35728 vs 34962), and a higher percentile (85 vs 84). It is the stronger choice for mobile workloads, where its 14 cores and higher base clock deliver superior performance in Cinebench R15/R20, data compression, encryption, physics, and sorting tasks. The 253PTE, however, is the better desktop part for specific workloads. It wins Cinebench R23 (both single and multi-core) by large margins, and it dominates integer and floating-point math. It also offers ECC support, double the PCIe lanes, and a larger L3 cache. For a desktop build that requires ECC memory, more PCIe expansion, or heavy integer/FP computation, the 253PTE is the clear pick. For a laptop or any mobile system, the 250H is the only option of the two, and its benchmark wins confirm it is a capable mobile processor.

Where Each One Wins

The 250H wins in: Cinebench R15 multi-core (46.8% ahead), Cinebench R20 multi-core and single-core (8.5% ahead each), Passmark data compression (9.9% ahead), data encryption (17.5% ahead), extended instructions (1.3% ahead), find prime numbers (29.3% ahead), multithread (8% ahead), physics (38.4% ahead), random string sorting (20.9% ahead), and Passmark single-thread (9.3% ahead). These results point to strengths in general productivity, compression, encryption, physics simulation, and memory-heavy sorting tasks.

The 253PTE wins in: Cinebench R15 single-core (1.3% ahead), Cinebench R23 single-core (35.7% ahead), Cinebench R23 multi-core (22.2% ahead), Passmark integer math (17.1% ahead), and Passmark floating-point math (3.1% ahead). These wins indicate a strong showing in modern rendering workloads (R23), integer-heavy calculations, and floating-point operations. The 253PTE's larger L3 cache and desktop platform likely contribute to these results, along with its ECC support and additional PCIe lanes for workstation or server-like use cases.