Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data delivers a decisive verdict: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins 16 of the 17 recorded comparisons, with the Intel Core 7 240H securing only a single victory. The most dramatic gap appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core Ultra 5 336H scores 3387 against 1719 for the Core 7 240H, a 49.2% advantage. This is the largest percentage delta across the entire test suite, indicating a fundamental leap in per-thread execution efficiency.

Multi-core performance tells a similar story, though with less extreme margins. The Cinebench R23 multicore test shows the Core Ultra 5 336H at 23991 versus 15764, a 34.3% lead. The Cinebench R20 multicore result narrows slightly: 10076 against 8562, a 15% difference. The Cinebench R15 multicore run is nearly identical between the two, with scores of 2418 and 2360, a 2.4% edge for the Core Ultra 5 336H. This pattern suggests that as the workload scales in duration and complexity, the newer architecture pulls further ahead.

Single-core performance in the older Cinebench tests reinforces the same conclusion. The R15 single-core score is 341 for the Core Ultra 5 336H versus 249 for the Core 7 240H, a 27% gap. The R20 single-core test shows 1422 against 1208, also a 15% difference. These results confirm that the Core Ultra 5 336H does not merely rely on additional cores; its individual cores are substantially faster.

PassMark results show a mixed but mostly favorable picture for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The largest single-core advantage outside Cinebench appears in the find prime numbers test, where the Core Ultra 5 336H scores 299 versus 102, a 65.9% lead. Floating point math shows 82415 against 58905, a 28.5% margin. Extended instructions deliver 24542 versus 16897, a 31.2% gain. Data encryption scores 21291 against 15155, a 28.8% difference. Physics simulation results 2682 versus 1723, a 35.8% edge.

The multi-thread PassMark score favors the Core Ultra 5 336H at 28545 versus 23975, a 16% advantage. Random string sorting shows 34402 against 28866, a 16.1% lead. Data compression is closer: 280340 versus 271774, a 3.1% gap. Single-thread PassMark scores are 4013 versus 3782, a 5.8% difference, the smallest single-core margin recorded.

The sole win for the Intel Core 7 240H comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 80396 against 62070 for the Core Ultra 5 336H, a 29.5% advantage. This outlier is notable because most other compute-heavy workloads favor the newer chip. The integer math result suggests the Core 7 240H retains specific strengths in certain arithmetic operations, possibly tied to its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz compared to 4.60 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H dominates across nearly every benchmark category, making it the clear choice for general-purpose computing, content creation, and heavy multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23991 places it well ahead of the Core 7 240H, and the single-core Cinebench R23 result of 3387 indicates superior responsiveness in single-threaded applications. The data shows wins in data compression, encryption, extended instructions, floating point math, physics simulation, and random string sorting, covering a broad spectrum of real-world tasks.

The single exception, PassMark integer math, defines the only scenario where the Core 7 240H takes the lead. With a score of 80396 versus 62070, it delivers 29.5% higher throughput in this specific benchmark. Integer math performance is relevant to certain database operations, financial calculations, and some scientific workloads, though the breadth of other wins for the Core Ultra 5 336H limits the practical impact of this single result.

The average benchmark scores in the database confirm the overall positioning. The Core Ultra 5 336H records an average score of 34485, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 240H averages 31483 at the 82nd percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 5 336H include the Intel Core i7-13700HX at 34554 with a 0.2% difference, and the Intel Core i5-13450HX at 34333 with a 0.4% difference, showing it sits in competitive company. The Core 7 240H sits near the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H at 31508 and the Intel Core i5-13500 at 31510, both with 0.1% deltas.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the superior processor in nearly all measured scenarios. Its 16 wins out of 17 head-to-head comparisons, combined with a higher average score (34485 versus 31483) and better percentile ranking (84th versus 82nd), make it the straightforward choice for users seeking maximum performance. The 34.3% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore and the 49.2% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core are decisive margins that translate directly to faster rendering, compilation, and application responsiveness.

The Intel Core 7 240H retains relevance only in the narrow integer math segment, where its 29.5% advantage could matter for specific workloads. However, the overall data does not support choosing it for general use. The Core 7 240H offers a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz against 4.60 GHz, but this does not translate into benchmark victories, as the Core Ultra 5 336H wins even the single-threaded tests despite the clock deficit.

For users who prioritize maximum multi-core throughput, single-thread speed, or energy efficiency, the Core Ultra 5 336H delivers on all fronts. Its lower TDP of 25 watts against 45 watts for the Core 7 240H, combined with superior scores, makes it the better engineering outcome. The Core 7 240H could be considered only for workloads specifically optimized for integer arithmetic, but the data shows no other area where it outperforms its rival.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 3387, while the Intel Core 7 240H scores 1719, giving the Core Ultra 5 336H a 49.2% advantage.

Q: How do the two compare in multi-core Cinebench R20?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 10076, and the Intel Core 7 240H scores 8562, resulting in a 15% lead for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the Intel Core 7 240H wins?

A: Yes, the Core 7 240H wins PassMark integer math with a score of 80396 versus 62070 for the Core Ultra 5 336H, a 29.5% margin.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H averages 34485, and the Intel Core 7 240H averages 31483, a difference of approximately 3002 points in favor of the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Q: How do the TDP ratings compare?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25 watts, while the Intel Core 7 240H has a TDP of 45 watts, making the Core Ultra 5 336H the more power-efficient option.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, higher than the 4.60 GHz of the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H, yet the Core Ultra 5 336H still wins most single-threaded benchmarks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different architectural generations. The Intel Core 7 240H uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node, fabricated by Intel, with the codename Raptor Lake-H. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H employs Panther Lake architecture on a 3 nm process node, also fabricated by Intel, with the codename Panther Lake. This process node difference, from 10 nm to 3 nm, is a primary factor in the performance and efficiency gap observed in the benchmarks.

Core counts differ substantially. The Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. This means the Core Ultra 5 336H does not use simultaneous multithreading, opting instead for more physical cores, whereas the Core 7 240H uses hyperthreading to reach 16 threads from 10 cores. The cache hierarchy also varies: the Core 7 240H has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs, with the Core 7 240H supporting DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, but the Core Ultra 5 336H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, a figure not listed for the Core 7 240H. Neither processor supports ECC memory. PCIe lanes also differ: the Core 7 240H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 336H offers Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 240H includes Iris Xe Graphics with 64 execution units, while the Core Ultra 5 336H includes Intel Xe3 Graphics. The production status for both is active, with release dates of 2024-12-17 for the Core 7 240H and 2026-01-04 for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The launch MSRP for the Core 7 240H is $502, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core 7 240H and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H differ across several core specifications. The Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.50 GHz for the Core 7 240H and 1.90 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 336H, while boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 4.60 GHz, respectively. The TDP is 45 watts for the Core 7 240H and 25 watts for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

Socket types differ, with the Core 7 240H using Intel BGA 1744 and the Core Ultra 5 336H using Intel BGA 2540. The architecture is Raptor Lake for the Core 7 240H and Panther Lake for the Core Ultra 5 336H. Process nodes are 10 nm and 3 nm, respectively. Cache configurations differ in all three levels: L1 is 80 KB per core for the Core 7 240H versus 192 KB per core for the Core Ultra 5 336H; L2 is 2 MB per core versus 2.5 MB per core; L3 is 24 MB shared versus 18 MB shared.

Memory support differs, with the Core 7 240H supporting DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, and memory bandwidth is recorded only for the Core Ultra 5 336H at 115.2 GB/s. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 8 lanes for the Core 7 240H and Gen 5 with 12 lanes for the Core Ultra 5 336H. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 64EU for the Core 7 240H and Intel Xe3 Graphics for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The part numbers differ: SRQ6TQ5ML for the Core 7 240H and SA4RD for the Core Ultra 5 336H. The Core 7 240H has a recorded launch MSRP of $502, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has no recorded launch MSRP.