Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core 9 273PE Comparison
Intel Core 7 240H
Core 9 273PE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 7 240H vs Intel Core 9 273PE
FAQ
Q: Which processor shows the higher overall average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PE records an average benchmark score of 49845, placing it in the 90th percentile against all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 240H averages 31483, which puts it in the 82nd percentile.
Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two chips?
A: The largest delta appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core 9 273PE scores 4417 against 1719 for the Core 7 240H, a difference of 61.1 percent.
Q: Does the Core 7 240H win any benchmark comparisons?
A: Yes, it wins in PassMark single-thread tests. It scores 3782 in both PassMark single_thread and singlethread entries, while the Core 9 273PE scores 3650, giving the Core 7 a 3.6 percent advantage.
Q: How do the two processors compare in multi-threaded workloads?
A: The Core 9 273PE leads in every multi-threaded test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it produces 31288 versus 15764, a 49.6 percent margin. In PassMark multithread, it scores 36810 against 23975, a 34.9 percent lead.
Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?
A: The Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads.
Q: What are the launch dates and MSRPs of these processors?
A: The Core 7 240H launched on 2024-12-17 with a launch MSRP of $502. The Core 9 273PE launched on 2026-03-08 with a launch MSRP of $549.
The Verdict
The benchmark data draws a clear line between these two Intel parts. The Core 9 273PE dominates the Core 7 240H in nearly every recorded test, winning 15 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons. Its average score of 49845 versus 31483 reflects a processor that sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 240H lands in the 82nd percentile.
The Core 7 240H is the pick only for workloads where single-thread PassMark performance is the priority. Its 3782 PassMark single-thread score edges out the Core 9 273PE's 3650, a 3.6 percent margin. That is a narrow win, and it does not translate into Cinebench single-core results, where the Core 9 273PE leads by 61.1 percent.
For multi-threaded rendering, content creation, or any task that scales across cores, the Core 9 273PE is the clear choice. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31288 nearly doubles the Core 7 240H's 15764. The Core 9 273PE also brings 12 cores and 24 threads against 10 cores and 16 threads, along with 36 MB of shared L3 cache versus 24 MB.
The Core 7 240H targets mobile platforms with its Intel BGA 1744 socket, 45 W TDP, and integrated Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The Core 9 273PE is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700 with a 65 W TDP and UHD Graphics 730. Buyers on a desktop platform with multi-threaded workloads should choose the Core 9 273PE. Users constrained to a mobile socket have only the Core 7 240H available in this comparison.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Core 9 273PE wins all Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 3153 against 2360, a 25.2 percent advantage. In R15 single-core, it scores 445 versus 249, a 44 percent gap. The R20 tests show a 34.8 percent lead in multi-core (13140 versus 8562) and a 34.9 percent lead in single-core (1855 versus 1208). R23 widens the gap further: multi-core results show 31288 versus 15764, a 49.6 percent difference, and single-core shows 4417 versus 1719, a 61.1 percent difference.
PassMark results follow the same pattern, with one exception. The Core 9 273PE leads in data compression by 33 percent (405885 versus 271774), in data encryption by 33.3 percent (22719 versus 15155), and in extended instructions by 31.4 percent (24630 versus 16897). Prime number finding shows a 49.8 percent edge (203 versus 102), floating point math shows a 45.4 percent edge (107884 versus 58905), and integer math shows a 42.3 percent edge (139410 versus 80396). The multithread test gives the Core 9 273PE a 34.9 percent lead (36810 versus 23975), physics a 44.8 percent lead (3120 versus 1723), and random string sorting a 36 percent lead (45098 versus 28866).
The Core 7 240H takes the PassMark single-thread test with 3782 against 3650, a 3.6 percent margin. This is its only victory in the head-to-head set, and it repeats across both single_thread and singlethread entries.
The Core 9 273PE's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (0.1 percent ahead), the Intel Core i5-14600KF (0.9 percent behind), the Intel Core i9-13980HX (1.1 percent ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (1.2 percent ahead). The Core 7 240H sits near the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 (0 percent delta), AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (0 percent), Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (0.1 percent behind), and Intel Core i5-13500 (0.1 percent behind).
Specification Differences
The Core 7 240H uses 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PE uses 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks differ slightly: 2.50 GHz for the Core 7 240H versus 2.30 GHz for the Core 9 273PE. Boost clocks reverse the order, with the Core 9 273PE reaching 5.70 GHz against 5.20 GHz for the Core 7 240H.
The TDP figures differ by 20 W. The Core 7 240H draws 45 W, while the Core 9 273PE draws 65 W. The sockets are incompatible: the Core 7 240H uses Intel BGA 1744, and the Core 9 273PE uses Intel Socket 1700.
Cache configurations differ in L3 capacity. Both chips use 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, but the Core 7 240H has 24 MB of shared L3, while the Core 9 273PE has 36 MB.
Memory support is the same in terms of DDR4 and DDR5 compatibility, and both use dual-channel memory buses. The Core 9 273PE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 7 240H has no recorded bandwidth figure. ECC memory support differs: the Core 9 273PE supports ECC, and the Core 7 240H does not.
PCIe connectivity differs. The Core 7 240H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 9 273PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Integrated graphics differ. The Core 7 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU, while the Core 9 273PE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Core 7 240H targets the mobile segment, and the Core 9 273PE targets the desktop segment.
Release dates are far apart. The Core 7 240H launched on 2024-12-17, and the Core 9 273PE launched on 2026-03-08. Both processors are listed as active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.
Architecture Differences
The Core 7 240H is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename and belongs to the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The Core 9 273PE uses Bartlett Lake architecture with the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) generation. Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel.
The core counts follow the architecture split. The Core 7 240H uses 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PE uses 12 cores and 24 threads. The additional cores and threads account for much of the Core 9 273PE's multi-threaded advantage.
Cache hierarchy differs only at the L3 level. Both chips use 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The Core 9 273PE carries 36 MB of shared L3, a 50 percent increase over the Core 7 240H's 24 MB.
The Bartlett Lake part adds ECC memory support, which the Raptor Lake mobile chip lacks. The Core 9 273PE also doubles the CPU PCIe lane count from 8 to 16. The integrated GPU differs as well: Iris Xe Graphics 64EU on the Core 7 240H versus UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 273PE.
The process node is identical, and the foundry is Intel for both. Neither chip uses 3D V-Cache, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Core 9 273PE's higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz, larger L3 cache, and greater core count align with its desktop positioning and its substantial lead across the benchmark suite.