CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9654

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 96 Cores / 192 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 384 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Core 7 240H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

10,248

2,053

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,446

289

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

42,703

8,558

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

6,028

1,208

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

101,675

20,378

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

14,354

2,877

passmark_data_compression

N/A

271,774

passmark_data_encryption

N/A

15,155

passmark_extended_instructions

N/A

16,897

passmark_find_prime_numbers

N/A

102

passmark_floating_point_math

N/A

58,905

passmark_integer_math

N/A

80,396

passmark_multithread

N/A

23,975

passmark_physics

N/A

1,723

passmark_random_string_sorting

N/A

28,866

passmark_single_thread

N/A

3,782

passmark_singlethread

N/A

3,782

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core 7 240H

Speed hunters examining the AMD AMD EPYC 9654 against Intel Core 7 240H from Intel can observe quickly that the AMD AMD EPYC 9654 holds the top spot. This silicon excels in intensive scenarios, positioning it excellent for enthusiasts. The technical enhancements over Intel Core 7 240H from Intel convert into real everyday gains. From content creation, the AMD AMD EPYC 9654 consistently beats its counterpart. The difference is notable enough to affect real usage.

This test margin between the AMD AMD EPYC 9654 and Intel Core 7 240H from Intel turns particularly evident in parallel tasks. Software like 3D rendering demonstrate the AMD AMD EPYC 9654's capabilities. The more cores provide considerable throughput for intensive workloads. Such throughput leads into shorter processing periods. Workflow improvements are real and meaningful.

At the end of the day: the AMD AMD EPYC 9654 wins this showdown decisively. Consumers valuing power will strongly select the AMD AMD EPYC 9654 over Intel Core 7 240H from Intel. The benchmark numbers validates this conclusion. The tasks might gain from the stronger capabilities. This is a clear victor in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9654

7 240H

Core Specs

Cores

10 -89.6%

Threads

192

16 -91.7%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.5 +4.2%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.7

5.2 +40.5%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.5 +4.2%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.7

5.2 +40.5%

Multiplier

25 +4.2%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

384 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

45 -87.5%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Raptor Lake

Codename

Genoa

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

78,840 million

—

Die Size

12x 72 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1800 MHz up to 4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 64EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$11805

$502

Part Number

100-100000789

SRQ6TQ5ML

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9654 Details View Core 7 240H Details