Intel Core 7 160UL vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 160UL and the Intel Core i5-14501E share the same Raptor Lake architecture and the same 5.20 GHz boost clock, but the benchmark comparison is one-sided. The Core 7 160UL has a full benchmark suite recorded in the database, while the Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries at all. As a result, there are no head-to-head test results to compare directly. The absence of recorded scores for the i5-14501E means the only measurable performance data belongs to the Core 7 160UL.

The Core 7 160UL posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9386 and a single-core score of 1325. In Cinebench R20, it reaches 3942 multicore and 556 single-core. Older Cinebench R15 runs show 946 multicore and 133 single-core. These scores place the chip at the 69th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

PassMark results for the Core 7 160UL show a multithread score of 11043 and a single-thread score of 3391. Integer math reaches 47515, floating point math reaches 25670, and extended instructions score 5832. Data compression scores 108953, data encryption scores 7146, and random string sorting scores 11843. Find prime numbers is the weakest workload at 50, while physics scores 819.

The nearest rivals for the Core 7 160UL show how tightly it clusters with other mid-range parts. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C posts an average score of 14277, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i5-10400F averages 14185, 0.3% lower. The Intel Xeon 6756E averages 14163, 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U averages 14320, 0.6% higher. The Core 7 160UL's own average benchmark score is 14232, putting it within 1% of all four nearest rivals.

Because the i5-14501E has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, no delta percentages can be computed against it. The Core 7 160UL effectively stands as the only scored processor in this pairing. Any attempt to compare specific workloads between the two is impossible from the recorded data.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 7 160UL wins every measurable category by default, simply because it is the only chip with benchmark results. Its strongest recorded workloads are data compression at 108953, integer math at 47515, and floating point math at 25670. These are compute-heavy tasks where the 10-core, 12-thread configuration shows its capacity. The single-thread PassMark score of 3391 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1325 indicate solid per-core performance for lighter workloads.

The i5-14501E has no benchmark wins in the database. Its entry lists zero scores across all test categories, and its percentile ranking sits at 50, below the Core 7 160UL's 69th percentile. The i5-14501E does have a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz compared to 1.80 GHz on the Core 7 160UL, which suggests better out-of-the-box responsiveness in frequency-sensitive tasks, but no recorded benchmark confirms this.

For users who need measured performance data, the Core 7 160UL is the only option with evidence. The i5-14501E's higher TDP of 65 watts versus 15 watts implies it can sustain higher clocks under load, but again, no benchmark data exists to verify real-world gains. The Core 7 160UL also carries integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, which gives it a clear advantage in any GPU-accelerated workload that does not require a discrete card. The i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770, which is present but unmeasured in the database.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's 10 nm process node and share the Raptor Lake architecture family. The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake-R, the refresh variant. Both fit the Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

The core counts diverge significantly. The Core 7 160UL has 10 cores and 12 threads. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. That means the Core 7 160UL brings 4 additional physical cores to the table, while both chips present the same thread count thanks to Hyper-Threading on the i5-14501E. For heavily threaded workloads, the extra cores on the Core 7 160UL should provide better parallel throughput, though the lack of i5-14501E benchmarks prevents confirmation.

Cache layouts also differ. The Core 7 160UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-14501E doubles that to 24 MB. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The larger L3 on the i5-14501E could help with repeated data access patterns in larger working sets.

PCIe support is another differentiator. The Core 7 160UL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. The i5-14501E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. That gives the i5-14501E double the lane count and a newer generation for faster peripheral bandwidth. For storage or GPUs that support Gen 5, the i5-14501E has a structural advantage.

ECC memory support is exclusive to the i5-14501E. The Core 7 160UL does not support ECC memory, while the i5-14501E does. This makes the i5-14501E more suitable for error-sensitive workloads like data integrity tasks or entry-level server use.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 7 160UL ships with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the i5-14501E ships with UHD Graphics 770. The Iris Xe part has more execution units, suggesting stronger integrated graphics performance, though no benchmarks are recorded for the i5-14501E to compare against.

Die size is only listed for the i5-14501E at 215 mm². The Core 7 160UL has no die size entry. The process node is identical at 10 nm, and both are produced by Intel.

The release dates differ by a few months. The Core 7 160UL launched on 2024-04-07, and the i5-14501E launched on 2024-06-30. Both remain in active production status. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either part.

The Verdict

The data in the database supports only one conclusion: the Intel Core 7 160UL is the only chip in this pairing with recorded performance. Its 69th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 14232 put it in the middle of the pack among all CPUs, roughly equal to the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, Intel Core i5-10400F, Intel Xeon 6756E, and AMD Ryzen 5 3501U. The i5-14501E has no scores, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average score of 0.

For workloads that benefit from more physical cores, the Core 7 160UL offers 10 cores versus 6 on the i5-14501E. For workloads that benefit from larger cache, the i5-14501E offers 24 MB of L3 versus 12 MB on the Core 7 160UL. For PCIe bandwidth, the i5-14501E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the Core 7 160UL. For ECC memory, only the i5-14501E qualifies.

Users who require ECC memory, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, or maximum L3 cache should consider the i5-14501E based on its specifications alone. Users who need verified benchmark results, more physical cores, or stronger integrated graphics should look at the Core 7 160UL. The Core 7 160UL also consumes far less power at 15 watts TDP compared to 65 watts for the i5-14501E, which matters for compact or low-power builds.

The i5-14501E's higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 1.80 GHz on the Core 7 160UL suggests better single-thread responsiveness in theory, but the absence of benchmark data means this cannot be confirmed. The Core 7 160UL's boost clock matches the i5-14501E at 5.20 GHz, so peak frequency is identical.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL has all recorded benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9386 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3391. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries in the database.

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 160UL does not.

Q: What is the L3 cache size on each chip?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has faster PCIe support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel Core 7 160UL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 7 160UL | Intel Core i5-14501E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 1.80 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-PS | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die Size | Not listed | 215 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2024-04-07 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | unknown | Q49HSRNJM |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Average Benchmark Score | 14232 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 69 | 50 |