Intel Core 7 160HL vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data between the Intel Core 7 160HL and the Intel Core 9 273PTE is one-sided in terms of recorded measurements. The database contains no benchmark entries for the Core 7 160HL, meaning its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. The Core 9 273PTE, in contrast, carries an average benchmark score of 31,143, which places it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Core 7 160HL sits at the 50th percentile, though with no recorded test scores, that figure reflects the absence of measurement data rather than a performance baseline.

The Core 9 273PTE shows substantial multi-core capability. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it records a score of 20,445 points. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core result is 8,586, and Cinebench R15 multi-core comes in at 2,060. Single-core results for the Core 9 273PTE are similarly present: Cinebench R23 single-core reaches 2,886, R20 single-core records 1,212, and R15 single-core scores 290.

PassMark results for the Core 9 273PTE cover a wide range of workloads. The multi-thread score is 24,054, while single-thread is 3,433. Integer math reaches 82,411, floating-point math hits 60,673, and extended instructions (SIMD) produce 15,952. Data compression finishes at 258,704, data encryption at 14,253, and random string sorting at 28,973. Find prime numbers scores 142, and the physics test records 1,917.

Because the Core 7 160HL has no recorded benchmarks, direct head-to-head deltas cannot be computed from the database. The nearest rivals of the Core 9 273PTE provide useful context for its standing. The Intel Core i7-12700F averages 31,081, a 0.2% gap relative to the Core 9 273PTE. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS averages 31,074, also 0.2% behind. The Intel Core i7-13700TE averages 31,028, which is 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i7-12650HX averages 31,290, placing it 0.5% ahead of the Core 9 273PTE. These narrow margins indicate the Core 9 273PTE performs in a tight cluster with these established desktop and mobile processors.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core 9 273PTE is the only one of the two processors with measured performance records. Its average benchmark score of 31,143 and 82nd percentile ranking confirm it as a functional, competitive desktop CPU. The Intel Core 7 160HL, lacking any benchmark entries in the database, cannot be evaluated on the same basis. Its 50th percentile figure reflects an unmeasured status, not a performance verdict.

For workloads that rely on multi-threaded throughput, the Core 9 273PTE shows strong results across Cinebench and PassMark suites. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with 36 MB of shared L3 cache, support this profile. The Core 7 160HL counters with 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that trades thread count for additional physical cores. The Core 9 273PTE has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz versus 5.20 GHz for the Core 7 160HL, while the Core 7 160HL has a much higher base clock at 2.50 GHz versus 1.40 GHz.

The Core 9 273PTE also brings platform-level advantages. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Core 7 160HL is limited to PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. The Core 9 273PTE records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a figure not listed for the Core 7 160HL. ECC memory support appears only on the Core 9 273PTE. These differences matter for systems that need newer I/O standards or error-correcting memory.

The Core 7 160HL instead offers a larger core count, a higher base clock, and an integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU solution. The Core 9 273PTE ships with UHD Graphics 730. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either. Both are active production parts on the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 9 273PTE wins in any scenario where measured performance is required. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,445 and PassMark multi-thread score of 24,054 indicate strong sustained throughput. The 82nd percentile ranking across all CPUs in the database reinforces this. Its 36 MB of shared L3 cache is the larger of the two, which can benefit workloads with large working sets. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides double the lane count of the Core 7 160HL and a newer generation of connectivity. ECC memory support makes it suitable for systems that require data integrity validation. The launch MSRP is $549.

The Core 7 160HL wins on core count, with 14 cores versus 12 for the Core 9 273PTE. It also wins on base clock, 2.50 GHz versus 1.40 GHz, which can translate to better responsiveness at idle or lightly threaded loads. Its integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU represents a higher-tier integrated GPU compared to the UHD Graphics 730 in the Core 9 273PTE. For systems that rely on the integrated graphics for display output or light acceleration, that difference is relevant. The Core 7 160HL also uses PCIe Gen 4, which, while older than Gen 5, remains a widely supported standard.

Neither processor offers an unlocked multiplier, so frequency tuning is not possible on either platform. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Core 7 160HL is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the Core 9 273PTE uses Bartlett Lake architecture. The Core 7 160HL was released in April 2024, while the Core 9 273PTE carries a March 2026 release date.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 160HL has 14 cores, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 160HL has 20 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has an average benchmark score of 31,143 and ranks in the 82nd percentile. The Intel Core 7 160HL has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of zero, ranking in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 160HL does not list ECC memory support.

Q: What PCIe versions and lane counts do the two processors use?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel Core 7 160HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE boosts to 5.50 GHz. The Intel Core 7 160HL boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core 7 160HL uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses Bartlett Lake architecture. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel. Both use an Intel Socket 1700 package and target the desktop market segment. Both processors are currently listed as active production parts.

Cache hierarchy is identical at the L1 and L2 levels: 80 KB per core for L1 and 2 MB per core for L2. The L3 cache differs significantly. The Core 7 160HL has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. That 12 MB difference is the largest architectural gap between the two.

Memory support overlaps fully: both support DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 9 273PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a specification not listed for the Core 7 160HL. ECC memory support is present on the Core 9 273PTE and absent on the Core 7 160HL.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 7 160HL includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the Core 9 273PTE includes UHD Graphics 730. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so the boost clocks are fixed by the manufacturer. The Core 9 273PTE has a part number of SA4QJ, while the Core 7 160HL has an unknown part number.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: 14 cores and 20 threads for the Core 7 160HL against 12 cores and 24 threads for the Core 9 273PTE. Base clocks are 2.50 GHz for the Core 7 160HL and 1.40 GHz for the Core 9 273PTE. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 5.50 GHz respectively. Both have a 45 W TDP.

L3 cache is 24 MB shared on the Core 7 160HL and 36 MB shared on the Core 9 273PTE. PCIe support differs by generation and lane count: Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the Core 7 160HL, Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Core 9 273PTE. ECC memory is unsupported on the Core 7 160HL and supported on the Core 9 273PTE.

Integrated graphics differ as noted. Memory bandwidth is only listed for the Core 9 273PTE at 89.6 GB/s. Release dates differ as well: April 2024 for the Core 7 160HL and March 2026 for the Core 9 273PTE. The Core 9 273PTE has a launch MSRP of $549, while no MSRP is recorded for the Core 7 160HL. The part number for the Core 9 273PTE is SA4QJ, while the Core 7 160HL has an unknown part number.