Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the Intel Core 7 150UL and the Intel Core i5-14501E?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both parts support 12 threads, but the Core 7 150UL includes four additional physical cores.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between these two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i5-14501E runs at a higher base frequency and boosts 0.20 GHz higher.

Q: How does the thermal design power (TDP) differ?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts. This indicates a substantial difference in power envelope, with the Core 7 150UL designed for much lower power consumption.

Q: Do these processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 7 150UL and the Intel Core i5-14501E use the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What are the differences in integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL features Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770. The Core 7 150UL has a higher execution unit count.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 150UL does not. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two distinctly positioned desktop processors. For workloads that benefit from additional physical cores, the Intel Core 7 150UL offers a 10-core configuration. Its 15-watt TDP indicates a power-efficient design, suited for systems where thermal and energy constraints are primary considerations. The higher core count, paired with a 12 MB shared L3 cache, suggests an advantage in multi-threaded productivity tasks that can utilize more than six cores.

The Intel Core i5-14501E, by contrast, uses a 6-core, 12-thread design with a much higher 3.30 GHz base clock and a 5.20 GHz boost clock. Its 65-watt TDP reflects a higher power envelope, which typically enables sustained performance in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The larger 24 MB shared L3 cache and support for ECC memory position it for applications requiring data integrity and higher per-core throughput. The i5-14501E also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, which is a significant interface advantage.

The database shows neither part holds a benchmark advantage in the head-to-head comparisons, as both average benchmark scores are zero and no wins are recorded for either side. Therefore, the choice depends on workload characteristics. The Core 7 150UL is the logical selection for multi-core parallel tasks within a low-power budget. The Core i5-14501E is the appropriate choice for single-thread performance, ECC memory support, and broader PCIe connectivity.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data contains no recorded entries. As such, there are no numeric results to compare between the Intel Core 7 150UL and the Intel Core i5-14501E. The average benchmark score for both processors is zero, and the percentile versus all CPUs is 50 for each. Without measured performance values, a direct numerical comparison of processing speed is not available from the database.

The absence of benchmark data means that conclusions about relative performance must be drawn from the specification differences. The Intel Core 7 150UL has a 4-core advantage, which in multi-threaded scenarios can be substantial, provided the software scales with core count. Conversely, the Intel Core i5-14501E has a 0.20 GHz higher boost clock and a 1.60 GHz higher base clock, which typically translates to faster single-thread execution when the workload is not core-limited.

The L3 cache difference is notable: 12 MB shared on the Core 7 150UL versus 24 MB shared on the Core i5-14501E. Larger cache can improve performance in data-intensive tasks by reducing memory latency. The i5-14501E also has a die size of 215 mm², whereas the Core 7 150UL has no recorded die size. None of these factors can be quantified into a score without benchmark results, but they indicate the i5-14501E is designed for higher per-core throughput.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications. The core count is 10 for the Core 7 150UL versus 6 for the Core i5-14501E. Threads are equal at 12. The base clock differs significantly: 1.70 GHz for the Core 7 150UL versus 3.30 GHz for the Core i5-14501E. The boost clock is 5.00 GHz for the Core 7 150UL versus 5.20 GHz for the Core i5-14501E. The TDP is 15 watts versus 65 watts.

The L3 cache is 12 MB shared on the Core 7 150UL and 24 MB shared on the Core i5-14501E. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and the L2 cache is identical at 1.25 MB per core. The socket is the same, Intel Socket 1700, for both. Memory support is the same: DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is not supported on the Core 7 150UL but is supported on the Core i5-14501E.

The PCIe interface differs: the Core 7 150UL uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i5-14501E uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are different: Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the Core 7 150UL versus UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i5-14501E. The die size is recorded for the i5-14501E at 215 mm², while the Core 7 150UL has no die size entry. The part number is unknown for the Core 7 150UL and Q49HSRNJM for the Core i5-14501E. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

Both processors utilize the Raptor Lake architecture and are built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The codenames differ: Raptor Lake-PS for the Core 7 150UL and Raptor Lake-R for the Core i5-14501E. The generation labels also differ: Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) versus Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

The core and thread counts reveal a structural difference. The Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, which indicates a heterogeneous core arrangement where not all cores contribute a thread pair. The Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, suggesting a more uniform configuration where each core supports two threads. Both have identical per-core L1 and L2 caches, but the shared L3 cache is 12 MB on the Core 7 150UL and 24 MB on the Core i5-14501E, reflecting the different memory hierarchy designs.

The integrated graphics differ in architecture as well. The Core 7 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Core i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770. The PCIe support is another architectural divergence: Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the Core 7 150UL versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Core i5-14501E. The market segment for both is desktop, and both are active in production. The release date for the Core 7 150UL is recorded as April 2024, while the Core i5-14501E has a June 2024 release date.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150UL wins in multi-core potential due to its 10-core count. Applications that parallelize well across more than six cores can leverage the additional physical cores. The 15-watt TDP makes it the superior option for low-power systems, fanless designs, or environments where heat dissipation is limited. The Iris Xe Graphics with 96EU provides a higher execution unit count, which may benefit integrated graphics workloads. The Gen 4 PCIe with 8 lanes is sufficient for standard expansion needs.

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins in single-thread performance scenarios. Its 3.30 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock are substantially higher than the Core 7 150UL's 1.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. This makes it the better choice for lightly threaded applications, such as legacy software or tasks that rely on high per-core frequency. The 24 MB L3 cache, double that of the Core 7 150UL, provides an advantage in workloads with large working sets that fit in cache. ECC memory support is a decisive factor for systems requiring error-correcting memory, such as file servers or workstations handling critical data. The Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes offers double the lane count and a newer generation, which benefits high-bandwidth devices like modern GPUs or NVMe storage.

The overall classification in the database places both processors at the 50th percentile, indicating they are positioned in the middle of the recorded CPU performance distribution. With no benchmark wins recorded for either part, the differentiation rests entirely on the specification profile. The Core 7 150UL is the pick for power-constrained multi-threaded workloads. The Core i5-14501E is the pick for frequency-sensitive tasks, ECC memory requirements, and expanded PCIe connectivity.