Intel Core 7 150U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains detailed benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 150U, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no benchmark entries in the current dataset. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible. Instead, the analysis focuses on what the Intel part’s measurements show and how they position it relative to its nearest rivals, then contrasts that with the Qualcomm part’s known specifications and its lower percentile ranking.

The Intel Core 7 150U delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8883 and a single-core score of 1875.5. In Geekbench, it records 6234 multi-core and 1857 single-core. These are solid mobile results. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 14700, a single-thread score of 3508, and strong sub-tests: integer math at 51057, floating point math at 34405, and extended instructions at 8748. Data compression reaches 158622, encryption hits 10025, and random string sorting scores 18269. Physics processing scores 1012, and prime number finding scores 58.

The Intel part’s average benchmark score is 17395, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are all AMD parts. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 averages 17333, which is only 0.4 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 also averages 17321, again 0.4 percent behind. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE averages 17482, which is 0.5 percent ahead of the Intel part, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G averages 17507, 0.6 percent ahead. These deltas are tiny, meaning the Intel Core 7 150U sits in a tightly contested performance band where no rival in its immediate neighborhood has a decisive edge.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, the database lists an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50. This indicates that no benchmark results are recorded for this processor. The absence of data prevents any numerical head-to-head comparison. The Qualcomm part’s percentile rank of 50, while below Intel’s 71, cannot be interpreted as a performance deficit because it is derived from an empty benchmark set. What can be said is that the Intel part has measurable, verified scores across multiple test suites, while the Qualcomm part does not yet have recorded measurements in this database.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 150U is the only one of the two with benchmark results. Its 71st percentile ranking and an average score of 17395 put it in line with several AMD desktop and mobile processors. The nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 and Ryzen 3 210, are essentially statistical ties at 0.4 percent difference. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE and Ryzen 5 4600G are also close, sitting 0.5 and 0.6 percent higher respectively. The Intel part therefore holds its own in this specific performance neighborhood.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, by contrast, has no benchmark data. Its 50th percentile rank reflects an absence of measurements, not a measured outcome. For anyone choosing strictly from the database, the Intel part is the only one with verifiable performance evidence. The Qualcomm part cannot be recommended on the strength of recorded benchmarks because none exist. The decision between these two processors, based on the data, is straightforward: the Intel Core 7 150U has demonstrated results; the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 does not.

The Intel part’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8883 and single-core score of 1875.5 indicate a balanced profile for mobile workloads. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 14700 and single-thread score of 3508 reinforce that balance. The Qualcomm part’s higher base clock of 3.40 GHz versus Intel’s 1.80 GHz and its 4.00 GHz boost versus Intel’s 5.40 GHz suggest different clock strategies, but without benchmark scores, those specifications cannot be translated into actual performance claims.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150U wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only part with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5248 and single-core score of 740, along with its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1505.5 and single-core score of 254, provide a full picture of rendering and single-threaded capability. The Geekbench scores of 6234 multi-core and 1857 single-core add cross-platform credibility. The Passmark suite covers integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, sorting, physics, and prime number finding, all with specific numbers. This is a comprehensive dataset.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 wins in the specification comparisons where its listed numbers exceed Intel’s. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz compared to Intel’s 1.80 GHz. Its boost clock is 4.00 GHz compared to Intel’s 5.40 GHz, so Intel actually wins on boost. The Qualcomm part has a higher TDP of 30 watts versus Intel’s 15 watts. Its process node is smaller at 4 nm versus Intel’s 10 nm. Its memory bandwidth is listed as 135.2 GB/s, which is a specific figure Intel’s entry lacks. Its L1 cache is 288 KB per core versus Intel’s 80 KB per core. Its L2 cache is 12 MB per module versus Intel’s 1.25 MB per core. Its L3 cache is 6 MB shared versus Intel’s 12 MB shared, so Intel wins on L3.

For use-case splits, the Intel part is the only one with evidence for productivity tasks, rendering, and general computing. The Qualcomm part has no evidence, so it cannot be assigned any workload wins based on the database. The Qualcomm part’s higher TDP and LPDDR5X memory support suggest a different design intent, but those are specifications, not measured outcomes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has all recorded benchmark scores. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no benchmark entries, so no comparison is possible.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 150U compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average score is 17395. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 and Ryzen 3 210 are each 0.4 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE is 0.5 percent ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is 0.6 percent ahead.

Q: What is the percentile ranking difference?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 sits at the 50th percentile, but that rank is based on an average score of 0, meaning no benchmarks are recorded.

Q: Does the Qualcomm part have any performance data?

A: No. The database lists its average benchmark score as 0 and its nearest rivals list is empty.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The Qualcomm part has a higher base clock at 3.40 GHz versus Intel’s 1.80 GHz. Intel has a higher boost clock at 5.40 GHz versus Qualcomm’s 4.00 GHz.

Q: Which part has more cores and threads?

A: Intel has 10 cores and 12 threads. Qualcomm has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-U codename. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses the Oryon codename with the Snapdragon X Plus generation. It is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. These are fundamentally different design approaches: Intel’s hybrid architecture with 10 cores and 12 threads versus Qualcomm’s 8 cores and 8 threads.

The cache hierarchies differ substantially. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Qualcomm provides 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3. The L1 and L2 configurations suggest different data locality strategies. Intel’s larger shared L3 at 12 MB versus Qualcomm’s 6 MB indicates more total on-chip cache for Intel, though Qualcomm’s per-core L1 and per-module L2 are larger.

Memory support diverges completely. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. Qualcomm supports LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration with a listed memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. Intel’s entry does not list a memory bandwidth figure. PCIe connectivity also differs: Intel offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while Qualcomm offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are different as well. Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Qualcomm uses Adreno X1-45.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: Intel has 10 cores and 12 threads, Qualcomm has 8 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ: Intel runs at 1.80 GHz, Qualcomm at 3.40 GHz. Boost clocks differ: Intel reaches 5.40 GHz, Qualcomm reaches 4.00 GHz. TDP differs: Intel is rated at 15 watts, Qualcomm at 30 watts. Process nodes differ: Intel uses 10 nm, Qualcomm uses 4 nm. Foundries differ: Intel is Intel, Qualcomm is TSMC.

Sockets differ: Intel uses Intel BGA 1744, Qualcomm uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. L1 cache differs: Intel has 80 KB per core, Qualcomm has 288 KB per core. L2 cache differs: Intel has 1.25 MB per core, Qualcomm has 12 MB per module. L3 cache differs: Intel has 12 MB shared, Qualcomm has 6 MB shared. Memory support differs: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, Qualcomm supports LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is listed for Qualcomm at 135.2 GB/s, while Intel’s entry has no figure. PCIe lanes differ: Intel has 8 lanes, Qualcomm has 12 lanes, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics differ: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, Qualcomm uses Adreno X1-45.

Release dates differ: Intel was released on 2024-01-07, Qualcomm on 2024-09-02. Part numbers differ: Intel is SRMYP, Qualcomm is X1P46100. Neither has a multiplier unlocked, and neither supports ECC memory. Both are listed as Active production status and target the Mobile market segment.