Intel Core 7 150U vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Intel Core 7 150U and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H are both active mobile processors from Intel, but they target distinctly different performance tiers. The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive overall advantage for the Core Ultra 5 336H, which wins every head-to-head comparison in the database. The Core 7 150U, however, operates in a lower power envelope and may serve systems where thermal and energy constraints take priority. The following analysis breaks down the data by workload, architecture, and final positioning.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head benchmark results are unambiguous: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins all 17 recorded comparisons. There are zero wins for the Intel Core 7 150U in the database. This complete sweep means that in every measured workload, from single-threaded response to multi-threaded rendering and specialized instruction tests, the Core Ultra 5 336H delivers higher raw scores.

The Core Ultra 5 336H shows its largest advantages in multi-threaded and compute-heavy tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23991 is 63% higher than the Core 7 150U's 8883. The PassMark extended instructions test shows an even larger gap, with the Core Ultra 5 336H scoring 24542 versus 8748, a 64.4% advantage. The PassMark find prime numbers test shows the widest relative delta: 299 versus 58, which puts the Core Ultra 5 336H 80.6% ahead. These results indicate the Core Ultra 5 336H is substantially better suited for rendering, scientific computing, and other workloads that scale with core count and instruction throughput.

The Core Ultra 5 336H also leads in single-threaded performance, though by a smaller margin. In PassMark single thread, it scores 4013 versus 3508, a 12.6% advantage. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 44.6% gap, with 3387 versus 1875.5. Even in the closest comparison, the Core Ultra 5 336H maintains a clear lead, meaning the Core 7 150U does not offer any measured advantage in responsiveness or lightly threaded applications.

The Core 7 150U does not win any category, so its positioning rests on its lower 15W TDP compared to the Core Ultra 5 336H's 25W TDP. The data does not include efficiency metrics, but the power envelope difference is recorded and suggests the Core 7 150U fits into thinner, fanless, or passively cooled designs where the higher-power part cannot be used.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and foundry nodes. The Intel Core 7 150U is built on Raptor Lake, specifically Raptor Lake-U, using a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses Panther Lake architecture, specifically Panther Lake-H, on a 3 nm process, also at Intel. The 3 nm node gives the Core Ultra 5 336H a smaller transistor geometry, which contributes to its higher performance per clock and greater efficiency at higher power.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Core Ultra 5 336H does not use simultaneous multithreading, as its thread count equals its core count. The Core 7 150U has 12 threads from 10 cores, indicating two cores are hyper-threaded. Despite having 4 more physical cores, the Core Ultra 5 336H still manages higher single-thread scores, thanks to its newer architecture.

Clock speeds also differ. The Core 7 150U has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 336H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core 7 150U has the higher boost clock, but the Core Ultra 5 336H still wins every single-threaded benchmark, which shows that the Panther Lake architecture delivers more work per cycle. The higher boost frequency of the Core 7 150U does not translate into a single-thread win.

Cache hierarchies are not directly comparable. The Core 7 150U has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 336H has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 336H has more cache at every level, which helps feed its wider execution resources and higher core count.

Memory support also differs. The Core 7 150U supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, and the database records a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s for the Core Ultra 5 336H. No comparable bandwidth figure is recorded for the Core 7 150U. The PCIe interface differs as well: the Core 7 150U uses Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 336H uses Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes. This gives the newer part more available bandwidth for attached devices.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 7 150U uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The Core Ultra 5 336H uses Intel Xe3 Graphics. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores, so the comparison here is limited to architectural naming and execution unit counts.

The sockets are different: the Core 7 150U uses Intel BGA 1744, and the Core Ultra 5 336H uses Intel BGA 2540. Both are mobile BGA packages, but they are not interchangeable. The release dates also differ, with the Core 7 150U released on 2024-01-07 and the Core Ultra 5 336H released on 2026-01-04.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H outperforms the Intel Core 7 150U in every recorded test, with an average benchmark score of 34485 versus 17395. The Core Ultra 5 336H sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Core 7 150U sits in the 71st percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 5 336H include the Intel Core i7-13700HX, which scores 34554 and trails by 0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13450HX at 34333, which the Core Ultra 5 336H leads by 0.4%. The Core 7 150U, by contrast, trades closely with AMD Ryzen 5 4500 (17333, 0.4% ahead), AMD Ryzen 3 210 (17321, 0.4% ahead), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17482, 0.5% behind), and AMD Ryzen 5 4600G (17507, 0.6% behind).

For workloads that stress the CPU, the Core Ultra 5 336H is the stronger choice. Multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and floating-point math all favor the Panther Lake part by wide margins. The 16 cores, larger cache, and newer 3 nm process combine to deliver a performance class well above the Raptor Lake part. The Core 7 150U cannot match it in any measured workload.

The Core 7 150U's only recorded advantage is its 15W TDP, which is 10W lower than the Core Ultra 5 336H's 25W TDP. For systems with strict power budgets, passive cooling designs, or smaller chassis, the Core 7 150U may be the only option that fits. It also supports DDR4 memory, which can be a cost or availability consideration for certain platforms, though the database does not record pricing for either part.

Users who prioritize raw CPU performance should select the Core Ultra 5 336H. Users who need a lower-power mobile processor and can accept lower benchmark scores in all categories should select the Core 7 150U. The data does not support any other conclusion.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores, while the Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores.

Q: How much faster is the Core Ultra 5 336H in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H scores 23991, which is 63% higher than the Core 7 150U's 8883.

Q: Does the Core 7 150U win any benchmark?

A: No. The Core Ultra 5 336H wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons in the database.

Q: What are the TDP values for these processors?

A: The Core 7 150U has a TDP of 15W, and the Core Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25W.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Core 7 150U has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the Core Ultra 5 336H's 4.60 GHz. Despite this, the Core Ultra 5 336H wins all single-threaded benchmarks.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 7 150U supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest performance gap appears in the PassMark find prime numbers test. The Core Ultra 5 336H scores 299, while the Core 7 150U scores 58. That is an 80.6% difference, the widest in the entire comparison. This test is sensitive to integer execution and core scaling, and the Core Ultra 5 336H's 16 cores and newer architecture deliver a massive advantage.

The Cinebench R23 multicore test shows a 63% gap. The Core Ultra 5 336H scores 23991, and the Core 7 150U scores 8883. This is the most representative test for all-core rendering workloads, and the result confirms that the Core Ultra 5 336H is in a different performance tier for multi-threaded content creation.

The PassMark extended instructions test shows a 64.4% gap, with 24542 versus 8748. This test measures AVX and other extended instruction throughput, and the Core Ultra 5 336H's newer Panther Lake cores handle these workloads far more efficiently.

The PassMark floating point math test shows a 58.3% gap, with 82415 versus 34405. The Core Ultra 5 336H nearly doubles the Core 7 150U's output in this test, which matters for scientific and engineering applications.

The PassMark physics test shows a 62.3% gap, with 2682 versus 1012. This test is often used as a proxy for gaming physics load, and the Core Ultra 5 336H delivers more than double the score.

The Cinebench R20 multicore test shows a 47.9% gap, with 10076 versus 5248. The Cinebench R15 multicore test shows a 37.7% gap, with 2418 versus 1505.5. Both confirm consistent multi-threaded advantages for the Core Ultra 5 336H across Cinebench versions.

The PassMark multithread test shows a 48.5% gap, with 28545 versus 14700. The PassMark data compression test shows a 43.4% gap, with 280340 versus 158622. The PassMark data encryption test shows a 52.9% gap, with 21291 versus 10025. The PassMark random string sorting test shows a 46.9% gap, with 34402 versus 18269.

The PassMark integer math test shows the smallest multicore gap at 17.7%, with 62070 versus 51057. Even here, the Core Ultra 5 336H holds a solid lead, but the Core 7 150U's higher boost clock narrows the difference in this particular integer workload.

Single-threaded gaps are smaller but still favor the Core Ultra 5 336H. The PassMark single thread test shows 4013 versus 3508, a 12.6% gap. The Cinebench R23 single-core test shows 3387 versus 1875.5, a 44.6% gap. The Cinebench R20 single-core test shows 1422 versus 740, a 48% gap. The Cinebench R15 single-core test shows 341 versus 254, a 25.5% gap. The Core Ultra 5 336H wins every single-threaded test despite having a lower boost clock, which confirms that Panther Lake's per-core efficiency outclasses Raptor Lake's frequency advantage.

The average benchmark score reflects the overall gap: the Core Ultra 5 336H averages 34485, and the Core 7 150U averages 17395. The Core Ultra 5 336H's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700HX, scores 34554, only 0.2% higher. The Core 7 150U's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G, scores 17507, only 0.6% higher. In absolute terms, the Core Ultra 5 336H delivers roughly double the average performance of the Core 7 150U, with no measured workload where the older part pulls ahead.