Intel Core 5 320 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 5 320 and the Intel Core i5-14501E. The Core 5 320 has a comprehensive benchmark suite spanning Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, along with PassMark workloads. The i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence of direct measurements means the analysis relies on the Core 5 320's absolute scores, its percentile position, and the architectural and specification differences between the two processors.

The Core 5 320 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6197 and a single-core score of 1926. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5462 multi-core and 771 single-core. The older R15 test shows 1054 multi-core and 276 single-core. These scores place the Core 5 320 at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score across the entire suite is 18023.

PassMark results for the Core 5 320 show a multi-thread score of 15450 and a single-thread score of 4045. The integer math workload scores 32323, while floating-point math reaches 42440. Data compression scores 148779, data encryption scores 10984, and extended instructions score 13262. The processor finds 110 prime numbers, performs 1221 in the physics test, and sorts 18038 random strings.

Since the i5-14501E lacks any benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison cannot be quantified with scores. Instead, the comparison rests on the Core 5 320's relative standing against its nearest rivals. The database lists four comparable processors: the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 with an average score of 17994 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core 5 120U at 17898 with a 0.7 percent delta, the Intel Core i5-1334U at 18154 with a negative 0.7 percent delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at 17891 with a 0.7 percent delta. The Core 5 320's average score of 18023 sits marginally above the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Core 5 120U, while it trails the i5-1334U by less than one percent. These narrow deltas indicate the Core 5 320 performs within a tight cluster of mid-range processors from both Intel and AMD.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split in intended usage. The Intel Core 5 320 targets the mobile segment with a 15 watt TDP, a single-channel memory bus, and a compact BGA 1516 socket. The Intel Core i5-14501E targets the desktop segment with a 65 watt TDP, a dual-channel memory bus, and the Socket 1700 platform. The i5-14501E offers 12 threads against the Core 5 320's 6 threads, which suggests a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads, though no benchmark scores confirm this. The Core 5 320 boosts to 4.60 GHz, while the i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, indicating a higher peak frequency for the desktop part. The Core 5 320 uses a 3 nm process node, while the i5-14501E uses a 10 nm node, which points to a newer fabrication technology for the mobile chip.

For users prioritizing portability and power efficiency, the Core 5 320 is the only viable option given its mobile market segment and low TDP. For users prioritizing raw thread count and higher boost clocks in a desktop environment, the i5-14501E is the logical choice, supported by its 12 threads and 5.20 GHz boost. The Core 5 320's 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs demonstrates solid general performance for its class, but the absence of any benchmark data for the i5-14501E prevents a definitive performance winner.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. Its process node is 3 nm, fabricated by Intel. The i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, and uses a 10 nm process node, also fabricated by Intel. The die size for the i5-14501E is 215 mm², while the Core 5 320 has no recorded die size.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Core 5 320 has a 192 KB L1 cache, a 2.5 MB L2 cache, and a 6 MB shared L3 cache. The i5-14501E has an 80 KB per-core L1 cache, a 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. For a 6-core processor, the i5-14501E's L1 totals 480 KB and its L2 totals 7.5 MB, both larger than the Core 5 320's aggregate caches. The L3 cache difference is particularly notable: 24 MB versus 6 MB, a fourfold advantage for the desktop chip.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 320 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770. Memory support for the Core 5 320 includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory support is available on the i5-14501E but not on the Core 5 320.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The Core 5 320 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU, while the i5-14501E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The desktop chip offers more than double the lane count and a newer PCIe generation, which matters for expansion cards and storage devices.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications. The Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clock for the Core 5 320 is 1.50 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.60 GHz. The i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP figures are 15 watts for the Core 5 320 and 65 watts for the i5-14501E.

The sockets are incompatible: Intel BGA 1516 for the Core 5 320 and Intel Socket 1700 for the i5-14501E. The market segments differ, with the Core 5 320 labeled as Mobile and the i5-14501E as Desktop. The release dates show the i5-14501E launched on 2024-06-30, while the Core 5 320 launched on 2026-04-15. Both processors are currently active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The launch MSRP for the Core 5 320 is $340. No launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-14501E. The part numbers differ: SAE3H for the Core 5 320 and Q49HSRNJM for the i5-14501E.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 threads. Both have 6 cores.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Core 5 320 boosts to 4.60 GHz, while the i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz. The desktop chip has a 0.60 GHz higher peak frequency.

Q: Are these processors compatible with the same motherboard?

A: No. The Core 5 320 uses Intel BGA 1516, a mobile socket, while the i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The i5-14501E has a 24 MB shared L3 cache, compared to the 6 MB shared L3 cache on the Core 5 320.

Q: Does the Core 5 320 support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 5 320 does not support ECC memory, while the i5-14501E does.

Q: How does the Core 5 320 rank among all CPUs?

A: The Core 5 320 sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18023.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 320 wins on power efficiency. Its 15 watt TDP is dramatically lower than the i5-14501E's 65 watt TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light mobile devices. The 3 nm process node indicates a newer manufacturing technology, which typically correlates with improved efficiency per watt. The single-channel memory bus is a limitation, but the recorded bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s provides a concrete performance figure for memory-bound tasks.

The Core 5 320 also wins on integrated graphics generation. The Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores represents a more recent graphics architecture compared to the UHD Graphics 770 in the i5-14501E. For basic display output and light graphics workloads, the newer Xe3 implementation may offer advantages, though no benchmark scores exist to confirm this.

The i5-14501E wins on multi-threading capacity. With 12 threads versus 6 threads, the desktop chip can handle twice as many concurrent threads. This matters for heavily threaded applications such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz also provides an advantage for single-threaded workloads that depend on peak frequency.

The i5-14501E wins on cache capacity. The 24 MB shared L3 cache is four times larger than the 6 MB L3 on the Core 5 320. Larger caches reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data, which can improve performance in workloads with repetitive data access patterns. The per-core L1 and L2 caches are also larger on the i5-14501E.

The i5-14501E wins on platform expansion. Its Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the CPU supports high-bandwidth devices such as modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The dual-channel memory bus allows for higher theoretical memory throughput compared to the single-channel bus on the Core 5 320, though no bandwidth figure is recorded for the desktop chip.

The i5-14501E wins on memory flexibility. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core 5 320 supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The addition of DDR4 compatibility allows the desktop chip to work with a wider range of existing memory modules. ECC memory support on the i5-14501E further extends its suitability for error-sensitive computing environments.

The Core 5 320 wins on recency of release. Its 2026-04-15 launch date comes after the i5-14501E's 2024-06-30 release, meaning the mobile chip benefits from a newer design cycle. The 3 nm process node reinforces this generational advantage.

The data shows two processors aimed at different segments with complementary strengths. The Core 5 320 delivers competitive benchmark scores within its mobile class, as indicated by its 72nd percentile ranking and narrow deltas to established mid-range rivals. The i5-14501E offers structural advantages in thread count, cache size, clock speed, and platform connectivity, though its lack of recorded benchmark scores leaves its practical performance unmeasured in the database.