Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 5 223PTE and Intel Core i5-14450HX are not available in the database, as the Core 5 223PTE currently has no recorded benchmark scores. The i5-14450HX, however, has an extensive benchmark record with an average score of 32,040, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. This percentile means the i5-14450HX outperforms roughly 82% of all processors in the database, a strong result for a mobile chip.

The i5-14450HX shows its strongest results in Cinebench R23 multi-core with a score of 20,108, while its single-core result in the same test reaches 2,838. In PassMark tests, the multi-thread score is 23,680 and the single-thread score is 3,643. Data compression work yields 278,538, while data encryption scores 15,574. Floating point math reaches 58,037 and integer math hits 78,330. Extended instruction performance measures 17,207, and random string sorting scores 29,565.

The nearest rivals for the i5-14450HX confirm its competitive standing. The Intel Core i7-13705H posts an average score of 32,076, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14450HX. The Intel Core i5-14400 achieves 32,115, a 0.2% advantage. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32,121, 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core i9-11900 reaches 32,226, a 0.6% lead. These margins are small, indicating the i5-14450HX sits in a tightly packed performance cluster where the top rival is less than 1% faster.

Because the Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark entries, no head-to-head wins can be assigned to either processor. The database records zero wins for both parts in direct comparison. This absence of data means the performance analysis rests entirely on the i5-14450HX measurements and the architectural specifications of both chips.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14450HX demonstrates clear strengths in multi-core workloads based on its recorded scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 20,108, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 23,680, indicates this processor handles heavily threaded tasks such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and scientific computation effectively. Data compression performance of 278,538 and integer math of 78,330 further support this profile, making the i5-14450HX suited for productivity applications that scale across cores.

Single-core performance for the i5-14450HX is also respectable. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,838 and PassMark single-thread result of 3,643 show solid responsiveness for everyday tasks, though the boost clock of 4.80 GHz limits peak single-thread performance compared to the Core 5 223PTE.

The Core 5 223PTE, despite lacking benchmark data, has architectural advantages that suggest where it would excel. Its boost clock of 5.40 GHz is substantially higher, which typically translates into faster single-threaded performance in lightly threaded applications. The larger 24 MB shared L3 cache, compared to 20 MB for the i5-14450HX, provides more on-chip storage for frequently accessed data, potentially improving performance in cache-sensitive workloads such as database queries and certain scientific simulations.

The Core 5 223PTE targets the desktop segment with a 45 W TDP, while the i5-14450HX is a mobile processor with a 55 W TDP. Desktop platforms generally allow sustained power delivery and better cooling, so the Core 5 223PTE can likely maintain its boost clock for extended periods. The i5-14450HX, however, uses the unlocked multiplier and fits into high-performance laptops, where its 10 cores provide a core-count advantage for parallel workloads.

The i5-14450HX wins decisively in multi-core throughput based on its 10 cores and proven benchmark results. The Core 5 223PTE, with 8 cores but a higher boost clock and more L3 cache, would likely win in single-threaded and lightly threaded scenarios. The absence of benchmarks for the Core 5 223PTE prevents a definitive quantitative conclusion.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families. The Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process node, while the i5-14450HX is based on Raptor Lake with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, also on a 10 nm node. Both chips are manufactured by Intel, and neither uses a stacked L3 cache design.

Core configurations differ significantly. The Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads. The two extra cores in the i5-14450HX provide additional parallel execution resources, which explains its strong multi-core benchmark showing. Both processors share the same L1 cache structure at 80 KB per core and the same L2 cache at 2 MB per core, but the L3 cache differs: the Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB shared, while the i5-14450HX has 20 MB shared.

Clock speeds favor the Core 5 223PTE. Its base clock is 2.30 GHz and boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz. The i5-14450HX runs at a 2.40 GHz base clock but boosts to only 4.80 GHz. The 600 MHz boost advantage for the Core 5 223PTE is substantial and likely provides a meaningful edge in single-threaded workloads.

Memory support is identical in type, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. However, the Core 5 223PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i5-14450HX has no bandwidth figure in the database. Both processors support ECC memory, an important feature for professional and server-adjacent workloads. PCIe support is also identical: Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. The Core 5 223PTE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14450HX has UHD Graphics 710. The 770-series iGPU is generally positioned higher in Intel's integrated graphics lineup, though no benchmark numbers are available for either.

The die size for the i5-14450HX is recorded at 257 mm², while the Core 5 223PTE has no die size measurement. The Core 5 223PTE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, whereas the i5-14450HX uses Intel BGA 1964, reflecting its mobile design. The Core 5 223PTE has a locked multiplier, while the i5-14450HX has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking on supported platforms.

Release timing and market positioning also differ. The Core 5 223PTE has a release date in March 2026, a desktop segment product with a launch MSRP of $232. The i5-14450HX was released in January 2024, targets the mobile segment, and has no launch MSRP recorded. Both are listed as active production parts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is 600 MHz higher than the i5-14450HX boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-14450HX has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the benchmark results for the Core 5 223PTE?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the Core 5 223PTE. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 50.

Q: How does the i5-14450HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14450HX averages 32,040 in benchmark scores. The Intel Core i7-13705H is 0.1% faster, the Intel Core i5-14400 is 0.2% faster, the Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.3% faster, and the Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.6% faster.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 223PTE and the i5-14450HX support ECC memory.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The Core 5 223PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i5-14450HX uses Intel BGA 1964.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-14450HX in measured performance terms, as the Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark scores recorded. The i5-14450HX delivers an average benchmark score of 32,040 and sits in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its 10 cores and 16 threads provide strong parallel processing capability, confirmed by Cinebench R23 multi-core results of 20,108 and PassMark multi-thread scores of 23,680.

The Core 5 223PTE offers compelling specifications that may translate to advantages in specific scenarios. Its 5.40 GHz boost clock is the highest recorded between the two, and the 24 MB L3 cache is larger. The desktop socket design and 45 W TDP suggest sustained performance potential. The launch MSRP of $232 positions it as a desktop processor, though pricing analysis is outside the data scope.

For users prioritizing proven multi-core performance in a mobile form factor, the i5-14450HX is the only choice with empirical support. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.6% of its average score, confirm that it competes effectively with established desktop and mobile processors from previous generations.

For users who need maximum single-thread clock speed and a desktop upgrade path, the Core 5 223PTE has the stronger specifications on paper. The higher boost clock and greater L3 cache give it theoretical advantages, but the absence of benchmark data means these advantages remain unverified.

The verdict from the recorded data: the i5-14450HX is the performance leader with measurable results, while the Core 5 223PTE is an unproven but promising desktop part with superior clock speeds and cache capacity.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PTE | Intel Core i5-14450HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | Not recorded |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | SA4QL | SRMXK |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 32,040 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 82 |