Intel Core 5 223PTE vs Intel Core 7 250H Comparison

The Intel Core 5 223PTE and Intel Core 7 250H are both 45 W processors from Intel, but they serve different market segments. The Core 5 223PTE is a desktop part on Socket 1700 with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 250H is a mobile part on BGA 1744 with 14 cores and 20 threads. The database contains a complete benchmark suite only for the Core 7 250H, while the Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible on measured performance; instead, the analysis relies on the architectural and specification differences recorded in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The `headToHeadBenchmarks` field in the database is empty, and the wins counter shows zero victories for either part. Consequently, there are no exact scores to compare for multi-core or single-core workloads. The Core 5 223PTE has an average benchmark score of 0, and its benchmark array contains no entries. The Core 7 250H, by contrast, has a complete benchmark profile with 17 recorded tests, including Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark suites.

For the Core 7 250H, the data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16561 and a single-core score of 1931. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 9697, and the single-core score is 1368. The Cinebench R15 results are 3147 for multi-core and 298 for single-core. PassMark results for the Core 7 250H include a multi-thread score of 27030, a single-thread score of 4148, integer math at 99100, floating point math at 65094, and data compression at 303269. Since the Core 5 223PTE lacks any scores, no relative performance deltas can be calculated from the database. The percentile ranking tells a partial story: the Core 7 250H sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 223PTE sits at the 50th percentile. This suggests the Core 7 250H outperforms the Core 5 223PTE in overall CPU capability, but without a common benchmark, the exact margin remains unmeasured.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 7 250H delivers wins across every benchmark category present in the database, simply because it is the only one with recorded scores. Its multi-core strength is evident from the Cinebench R23 score of 16561, which indicates strong parallel processing capability for rendering and compilation workloads. The single-core score of 1931 in R23 shows competitive per-thread performance, useful for lightly threaded tasks like gaming or office applications. PassMark data reinforces this: the integer math score of 99100 and floating point math score of 65094 demonstrate solid arithmetic throughput, while the physics score of 1824 and extended instructions score of 17318 cover specialized workloads.

The Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark wins because none are recorded. Its use case must be inferred from its specifications. As a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, it targets mainstream desktop builds where the user provides their own cooling and power delivery. The socket 1700 compatibility allows installation on existing desktop motherboards, which is a practical advantage for upgrades. The Core 7 250H, being mobile on BGA 1744, is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. Therefore, the Core 5 223PTE wins on upgradeability and desktop flexibility, even though the performance data is absent.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a 10 nm process node from Intel, but they belong to different families. The Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, which the database lists as its generation. The Core 7 250H uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename, and its generation is listed as Raptor Lake Refresh. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and both share 24 MB of L3 cache. The core counts differ substantially: the Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Core 7 250H likely uses a hybrid core arrangement given the thread count, but the database does not specify the core type breakdown.

The base clock differs, with the Core 5 223PTE at 2.30 GHz and the Core 7 250H at 2.50 GHz, though both boost to 5.40 GHz. Memory support is identical in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The Core 5 223PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 7 250H has no bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory support is a key difference: the Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 250H does not. This makes the desktop part suitable for error-sensitive workloads like file servers or workstation tasks.

PCIe lanes also differ. The Core 5 223PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core 7 250H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The desktop part offers twice the PCIe lane count, which supports more expansion cards, GPUs, or NVMe drives directly from the processor. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 5 223PTE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core 7 250H uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Iris Xe with 96 execution units is typically a more capable integrated GPU than UHD 770, but the database does not provide benchmark scores for either iGPU.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core 7 250H provides 6 additional cores and 4 additional threads.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses. The Core 5 223PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 7 250H does not have a bandwidth figure in the database.

Q: Can the Core 5 223PTE use ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory. The Core 7 250H does not support ECC memory, which is a notable difference for reliability-focused desktop builds.

Q: What is the boost clock of each processor?

A: Both processors boost to 5.40 GHz. The base clocks differ, with the Core 5 223PTE at 2.30 GHz and the Core 7 250H at 2.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor offers more PCIe lanes?

A: The Core 5 223PTE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core 7 250H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes. The desktop part has double the CPU-attached lanes.

Q: Does the Core 7 250H have a higher average benchmark score?

A: Yes, the Core 7 250H has an average benchmark score of 35728 and sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 5 223PTE has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Core 7 250H is the stronger performer in raw compute terms, based on its complete benchmark profile and higher percentile ranking. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16561 and single-core score of 1931 confirm solid performance across both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The Core 5 223PTE, with no benchmark data, cannot be directly compared, but its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is a mid-range desktop part. Users building a desktop system with upgrade potential should choose the Core 5 223PTE for its Socket 1700 compatibility, 16 PCIe lanes, and ECC memory support. Users needing maximum multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor should choose the Core 7 250H, which delivers 14 cores, 20 threads, and a recorded 85th percentile standing. The Core 7 250H also carries a higher launch MSRP of $502, while the Core 5 223PTE has a launch MSRP of $232, but pricing is not a factor in performance selection.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PTE | Intel Core 7 250H |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-H |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Supported | Not supported |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-12-17 |

| Launch MSRP | $232 | $502 |

| Part Number | SA4QL | SRQ6UQ5MK |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50th | 85th |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 35728 |