Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

# The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 223PQE and Intel Processor 300 occupy opposite ends of the desktop CPU spectrum, and the recorded data makes the separation clear. The Core 5 223PQE is a high-core-count part with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 4.00 GHz base clock, and a 5.50 GHz boost clock. The Intel Processor 300 is a dual-core part with 4 threads, a 3.90 GHz base clock, and no boost clock listed. The Core 5 223PQE targets workloads that scale across many threads, while the Intel Processor 300 serves as an entry-level desktop solution.

Benchmark data shows the Core 5 223PQE holds a commanding structural advantage: four times the cores and four times the threads of the Intel Processor 300. The Core 5 223PQE also carries a 125 W TDP versus 46 W for the Intel Processor 300, which indicates the former is designed for sustained multi-core throughput and the latter for modest power envelopes. The Core 5 223PQE includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Processor 300 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. That fourfold difference in L3 capacity directly supports the Core 5 223PQE's larger thread count.

For users running parallel compilation, rendering, or simulation workloads, the Core 5 223PQE is the only choice between the two based on core count and cache size. For users with single-threaded or lightly threaded applications, the Intel Processor 300's 3.90 GHz base clock is close to the Core 5 223PQE's 4.00 GHz base, but the Core 5 223PQE can reach 5.50 GHz boost, which should deliver notably higher peak single-thread performance. The Intel Processor 300 has no boost clock recorded, so its maximum frequency remains unspecified in the database. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor.

# Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same Intel Socket 1700 platform and the same 10 nm process node, with Intel as the foundry for both. However, the underlying designs diverge significantly. The Core 5 223PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. Bartlett Lake and Raptor Lake are separate microarchitectural families within the same socket generation.

Cache organization differs at the L2 level. The Core 5 223PQE provides 2 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel Processor 300 provides 1.25 MB per core. Both parts share the same 80 KB L1 cache per core. The L3 cache disparity is substantial: 24 MB shared on the Core 5 223PQE versus 6 MB shared on the Intel Processor 300. This larger L3 pool on the Core 5 223PQE is consistent with its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, which needs more shared cache to feed concurrent execution units.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 223PQE carries UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Processor 300 has UHD Graphics 710. Both are Intel integrated graphics solutions, but the 770 tier sits above the 710 tier in the product stack.

Memory support is identical in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5, both use dual-channel memory buses. The Core 5 223PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Processor 300 has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory support is present on the Core 5 223PQE but absent on the Intel Processor 300. PCIe connectivity is the same: Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) on both.

The Intel Processor 300 has a recorded die size of 163 mm², while the Core 5 223PQE has no die size listed. The release dates are far apart: the Intel Processor 300 launched on 2024-01-07, and the Core 5 223PQE on 2026-03-08. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 223PQE is $319, and for the Intel Processor 300 it is $82.

# FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads. The Core 5 223PQE offers four times the core count and four times the thread count.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300 support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Processor 300 does not support ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 223PQE does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Processor 300?

A: The database does not list a boost clock for the Intel Processor 300. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both use Intel Socket 1700. They also share the same 10 nm process node and are both manufactured by Intel.

Q: Which integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PQE | Intel Processor 300 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 2 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 125 W | 46 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Die Size | Not listed | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 2 MB | 1.25 MB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 24 MB | 6 MB |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $319 | $82 |

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data is empty in the database, so no direct measured scores exist for these two processors against each other. However, the recorded structural specifications provide a basis for analytical comparison.

The largest advantage for the Intel Core 5 223PQE is its core and thread count. With 8 cores and 16 threads versus 2 cores and 4 threads, the Core 5 223PQE should deliver approximately four times the multi-threaded throughput in workloads that scale linearly with thread count. The L3 cache difference reinforces this: 24 MB versus 6 MB means the Core 5 223PQE can keep far more working data on-die, reducing reliance on system memory.

The base clock difference is small: 4.00 GHz for the Core 5 223PQE versus 3.90 GHz for the Intel Processor 300. That 0.10 GHz gap is minor, but the Core 5 223PQE's boost clock of 5.50 GHz gives it a substantial frequency headroom that the Intel Processor 300 does not have, since no boost clock is listed for the latter. For single-threaded tasks that hit boost frequencies, the Core 5 223PQE should pull ahead by a wide margin.

Memory bandwidth favors the Core 5 223PQE with a recorded 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded bandwidth figure. Both support DDR4 and DDR5, and both use dual-channel buses, so the Core 5 223PQE's higher bandwidth likely stems from its larger cache hierarchy and memory controller configuration.

Power and thermal characteristics favor the Intel Processor 300. The 46 W TDP is roughly one-third of the Core 5 223PQE's 125 W TDP. For systems with limited cooling or small power supplies, the Intel Processor 300 presents a much lighter load. The Core 5 223PQE's higher TDP is the tradeoff for its additional cores and higher boost clock.

ECC memory support on the Core 5 223PQE gives it an edge in error-sensitive workloads such as scientific computing or server-style tasks. The Intel Processor 300 lacks this capability. Integrated graphics also differ: UHD Graphics 770 on the Core 5 223PQE versus UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel Processor 300, with the 770 expected to deliver better media and display performance based on its higher position in Intel's integrated graphics lineup.

The production status for both parts is Active, meaning both remain available in the market. The release dates show a two-year gap, with the Intel Processor 300 arriving in early 2024 and the Core 5 223PQE in early 2026. Both parts share the same socket, process node, memory types, memory bus width, and PCIe configuration, so platform compatibility for those features is identical.

In summary, the Core 5 223PQE dominates in multi-core capability, cache capacity, peak frequency, memory bandwidth, ECC support, and integrated graphics tier. The Intel Processor 300 offers a much lower TDP, a smaller die, and a later-market entry point for cost-constrained desktop builds. The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head scores, but the architectural deltas point to a clear performance separation.