Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 223PQE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 225

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 10 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,609
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
368
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
6,317
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
891
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
25,891
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,655
passmark_data_compression
N/A
302,811
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
22,285
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
27,162
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
358
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
92,038
passmark_integer_math
N/A
65,345
passmark_multithread
N/A
30,459
passmark_physics
N/A
2,342
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
36,590
passmark_single_thread
N/A
4,412
passmark_singlethread
N/A
4,412

Analysis: Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible on a test-by-test basis. However, the Core Ultra 5 225’s recorded data can be analyzed against its nearest rivals to establish its performance tier, which then contextualizes the Core 5 223PQE based on its specifications.

For the Core Ultra 5 225, the strongest recorded result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 25,891 points. In single-core Cinebench R23, it scores 3,655 points. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 30,459 and a single-thread score of 4,412. The data compression test yields 302,811, while floating point math scores 92,038 and integer math scores 65,345. Extended instructions score 27,162, and random string sorting scores 36,590. Data encryption scores 22,285, and the find prime numbers test scores 358. Physics scores 2,342.

The Core Ultra 5 225 holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36,938. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, posts an average score of 36,945, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018, which is 0.2 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093, 0.4 percent higher. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112, 0.5 percent higher. These narrow deltas indicate the Core Ultra 5 225 sits statistically level with these competitors, within a half percent margin.

The Core 5 223PQE has an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking, meaning no measured performance data exists in the database. Its specifications suggest it targets a different performance envelope, but without recorded scores, no direct head-to-head wins can be quantified. The data shows the Core Ultra 5 225 delivers measurable results across all tests, while the Core 5 223PQE remains unmeasured.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in architecture. The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 uses the Arrow Lake architecture, codenamed Arrow Lake-S, built on a 3 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The Core Ultra 5 225’s transistor count is 17,800 million, with a die size of 243 mm². The Core 5 223PQE has no recorded transistor count or die size.

Core configuration diverges sharply. The Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating hyper-threading support. The Core Ultra 5 225 has 10 cores and 10 threads, meaning each core handles exactly one thread. Despite fewer threads, the Core Ultra 5 225 uses a newer process node, which typically improves efficiency and per-clock performance.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. The Core 5 223PQE has L1 cache of 80 KB per core, L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and L3 cache of 24 MB shared. The Core Ultra 5 225 has L1 cache of 192 KB per core, L2 cache of 3 MB per core, and L3 cache of 20 MB shared. The Core Ultra 5 225 offers larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, while the Core 5 223PQE has a larger shared L3 cache.

Clock speeds favor the Core 5 223PQE. Its base clock is 4.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 225 has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Core 5 223PQE thus has a 0.70 GHz higher base clock and a 0.60 GHz higher boost clock. Thermal design power differs substantially: the Core 5 223PQE is rated at 125 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 225 is rated at 65 watts. This suggests the Core Ultra 5 225 operates at a much lower power envelope.

Memory support separates the two. The Core 5 223PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 225 supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Memory bandwidth favors the Core Ultra 5 225, which records 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s for the Core 5 223PQE. ECC memory is supported by the Core 5 223PQE but not by the Core Ultra 5 225.

PCIe lanes differ. The Core 5 223PQE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 225 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Core Ultra 5 225 offers four additional lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 5 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU.

Sockets are incompatible. The Core 5 223PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses Intel Socket 1851. Release dates differ: the Core 5 223PQE launched on 2026-03-08, while the Core Ultra 5 225 launched on 2025-01-06. The Core Ultra 5 225 is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, while the Core 5 223PQE has no series designation.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 225 wins in every measured benchmark category, simply because it has recorded scores and the Core 5 223PQE has none. Its strongest relative performance appears in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,891 and PassMark multi-thread score of 30,459 indicate solid parallel processing capability. Data compression at 302,811 and floating point math at 92,038 further support this. The 85th percentile ranking places it above the median CPU in the database.

The Core 5 223PQE wins in specific specification comparisons. It has a higher base clock by 0.70 GHz and a higher boost clock by 0.60 GHz. It supports ECC memory, which the Core Ultra 5 225 does not. It also supports DDR4 memory alongside DDR5, giving it broader memory compatibility. Its larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB exceeds the Core Ultra 5 225’s 20 MB. The 125 watt TDP, while higher, indicates the processor is designed to sustain higher clock speeds under load.

For single-threaded tasks, the Core Ultra 5 225 records a PassMark single-thread score of 4,412 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,655. These scores place it competitively against its nearest rivals, all within 0.5 percent of its average benchmark score. The Core 5 223PQE’s higher clocks could theoretically benefit single-thread performance, but no data confirms this.

For multi-threaded tasks, the Core Ultra 5 225’s 10 cores and 10 threads deliver measured results, but the Core 5 223PQE’s 8 cores and 16 threads could provide better thread-level parallelism in heavily threaded applications. Again, no benchmark data exists for the Core 5 223PQE to verify this.

Power efficiency favors the Core Ultra 5 225. Its 65 watt TDP is nearly half the Core 5 223PQE’s 125 watts, and its 3 nm process node from TSMC suggests higher transistor density and lower power draw per operation. The Core 5 223PQE’s 10 nm node is older and typically less efficient.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear asymmetry. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has comprehensive benchmark results, an 85th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 36,938. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average score of 0. For any purchaser relying on measured performance, the Core Ultra 5 225 is the only option with verified data.

The Core Ultra 5 225’s nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and Intel Core i9-12900T, all score within 0.5 percent of it. This places the Core Ultra 5 225 in a well-established performance tier. Its 10-core, 10-thread configuration, 3 nm process, and 20 MB L3 cache deliver solid results across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

The Core 5 223PQE, however, offers specifications that could appeal to specific use cases. Its ECC memory support makes it suitable for error-sensitive workloads like data processing or server-like tasks. Its DDR4 compatibility provides flexibility for older platforms. Its higher base and boost clocks suggest potential for single-thread responsiveness, though unverified. Its 125 watt TDP implies it is designed for sustained performance rather than efficiency.

For users prioritizing verified performance, the Core Ultra 5 225 is the clear choice based on recorded data. For users needing ECC memory or DDR4 support, the Core 5 223PQE is the only option, but its performance remains unmeasured. The database cannot confirm any performance advantage for the Core 5 223PQE, so any decision favoring it must rely on its feature set rather than benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 223PQE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 223PQE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has 10 cores and 10 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the benchmark percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PQE ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 supports only DDR5.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core 5 223PQE | Intel Core Ultra 5 225 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Bartlett Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm (Intel) | 3 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB per core | 3 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB shared | 20 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 20 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2025-01-06 |

| Launch MSRP | $319 | $246 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 36,938 |

| Percentile | 50 | 85 |

| Part Number | SA4QC | SRQCZSRVF7 |

The Core Ultra 5 225 has a lower launch MSRP of $246 compared to $319 for the Core 5 223PQE. Both processors have locked multipliers. The Core Ultra 5 225 is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, while the Core 5 223PQE has no series designation. Both target the desktop market segment and are currently active in production.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 223PQE
Ultra 5 225
Core Specs
Cores
8
10 +25.0%
Threads
16
10 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
4
3.3 -17.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.5
4.9 -10.9%
Frequency (GHz)
4
3.3 -17.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.5
4.9 -10.9%
Multiplier
40
33 -17.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
125
65 -48.0%
PL1
253 W
65 W
PL2
253 W
121 W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Arrow Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Transistors
—
17,800 million
Die Size
—
243 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
—
2.7 GHz up to 4.4 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$319
$246
Part Number
SA4QC
SRQCZSRVF7
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Core 5 223PQE Details View Core Ultra 5 225 Details