Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core i9-14900 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core i9-14900?

A: The Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads. The i9-14900 offers three times the core count and double the thread count.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The Core i9-14900 reaches a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, while the Core 5 223PQE tops out at 5.50 GHz. The i9-14900 holds a 0.30 GHz advantage at peak frequency.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these two processors?

A: The Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, whereas the Core i9-14900 has a TDP of 65 watts. The Core 5 consumes nearly double the thermal design power despite having fewer cores.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core i9-14900 support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory types with dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The Core 5 223PQE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core i9-14900 has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-14900 provides 12 MB more L3 cache.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Core i9-14900 ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 223PQE ranks in the 50th percentile. The i9-14900's average benchmark score is 58115, compared to 0 for the Core 5 223PQE, which has no recorded benchmark entries in the database.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core i9-14900 both use Intel's 10 nm process node and are built by Intel, but their underlying designs diverge significantly. The Core 5 223PQE carries the codename Bartlett Lake and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the Core i9-14900 uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series.

Core topology separates the two most clearly. The Core 5 223PQE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, a modest configuration for desktop work. The Core i9-14900 scales up to 24 cores and 32 threads, which indicates a hybrid arrangement typical of the Raptor Lake refresh generation. The i9-14900 also has a larger die at 257 mm², while the Core 5 223PQE has no listed die size.

Cache hierarchies share the same per-core L1 and L2 allocations: 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core on both processors. The shared L3 cache is where they part ways, with the Core 5 223PQE offering 24 MB and the Core i9-14900 offering 36 MB. Neither processor has 3D V-Cache.

Memory support is identical in scope: both accept DDR4 and DDR5, run dual-channel, and support ECC memory. The Core 5 223PQE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i9-14900 has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Both processors provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes and integrate UHD Graphics 770.

The Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, versus a 2.00 GHz base and 5.80 GHz boost on the Core i9-14900. The higher base clock on the Core 5 223PQE suggests a design focused on sustained all-core frequency at lower core counts, while the i9-14900 relies on its larger core pool and higher boost ceiling. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Release timing also differs. The Core 5 223PQE was released on 2026-03-08, while the Core i9-14900 was released on 2024-01-07. Both are currently marked as Active in production status and target the Desktop market segment.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core i9-14900 but no benchmark entries for the Intel Core 5 223PQE. As a result, the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the recorded performance of the i9-14900 across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i9-14900 scores 4793, with a single-core score of 315. The R20 run shows a multicore score of 15910 and a single-core score of 2245. The R23 multicore result reaches 31070, and single-core lands at 2212. These results indicate that the i9-14900 delivers strong scaling in multi-threaded rendering workloads, consistent with its 24-core, 32-thread design.

Geekbench results reinforce this pattern. The Core i9-14900 records a multicore score of 18495 and a single-core score of 2488. The multicore figure is roughly 7.4 times the single-core figure, which reflects the processor's ability to distribute work across its many threads.

Passmark tests cover a broader range of workloads. The multithread score is 44578, and the single-thread score is 4323. Integer math reaches 175010, floating-point math hits 120262, and extended instructions score 30624. Data compression scores 550271, while data encryption scores 33540. Find prime numbers returns 188, physics scores 2486, and random string sorting scores 61060.

The Core i9-14900's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its overall standing. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323, which is 0.4% higher than the i9-14900's average of 58115. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58386, 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57555, which is 1% lower. The i9-14900 sits within a narrow band of less than one percent separating it from three of these four rivals.

The Core 5 223PQE has no recorded scores, no wins, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs, but the absence of benchmark data means no direct numerical comparison can be made against the i9-14900's measured results.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of roles. The Intel Core i9-14900 is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results, and those results place it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 58115. Its nearest rivals cluster within 1% of that score, confirming that it performs at a high tier relative to other desktop and workstation processors.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark entries, which means the database contains no evidence of its performance in any tested workload. Its specifications suggest a different design intent: 8 cores, 16 threads, a 4.00 GHz base clock, and a 125 watt TDP. The higher base clock and double the TDP of the i9-14900 point toward a processor that prioritizes single-core responsiveness and consistent frequency over thread count.

For workloads that benefit from many threads, such as rendering, data compression, or encryption, the Core i9-14900 has documented scores that demonstrate strong multi-threaded output. Its 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with 36 MB of L3 cache, give it a structural advantage in parallel tasks. The Core 5 223PQE cannot be assessed on this front due to missing data.

For workloads that favor high base clocks and lower core counts, the Core 5 223PQE has specifications that could be competitive, but the lack of measured results prevents any confirmation. The i9-14900, by contrast, has a 92nd percentile rank and an average score that sits within 1% of several Xeon and Ryzen competitors.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. Core count: 8 on the Core 5 223PQE versus 24 on the Core i9-14900. Thread count: 16 versus 32. Base clock: 4.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz. Boost clock: 5.50 GHz versus 5.80 GHz. TDP: 125 watts versus 65 watts.

L3 cache: 24 MB shared on the Core 5 223PQE versus 36 MB shared on the Core i9-14900. Die size: not listed for the Core 5 223PQE, versus 257 mm² for the Core i9-14900. Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s for the Core 5 223PQE, versus no listed value for the Core i9-14900.

Architecture and generation: Bartlett Lake with Core 5 branding for the former, Raptor Lake with Core 14th Gen branding for the latter. Release date: 2026-03-08 versus 2024-01-07. Launch MSRP: $319 for the Core 5 223PQE and $549 for the Core i9-14900. Part numbers also differ: SA4QC for the Core 5 223PQE and SRN3V for the Core i9-14900.

Identical specifications include the 10 nm process node, Intel as the foundry, 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, UHD Graphics 770, Desktop market segment, Active production status, and locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14900 wins every category where benchmark data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070, Geekbench multicore score of 18495, and Passmark multithread score of 44578 all demonstrate strong performance in multi-threaded applications. Data compression at 550271 and data encryption at 33540 further support its capability in data-heavy tasks. Integer math at 175010 and floating-point math at 120262 round out a comprehensive set of compute strengths. The 92nd percentile ranking confirms that the i9-14900 competes at the top tier of all CPUs, with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Xeon w5-2545 within 0.7% of its average score.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark wins, so its advantages must be inferred from specifications. Its 4.00 GHz base clock is double that of the i9-14900's 2.00 GHz base clock, which could translate to faster responsiveness in lightly threaded or latency-sensitive tasks, though no measurements confirm this. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a listed figure, while the i9-14900 has none recorded. The Core 5 223PQE also has a lower launch MSRP of $319 compared to $549 for the i9-14900.

The data shows a clear split: the i9-14900 is the measured performer across all benchmark categories, while the Core 5 223PQE offers specification-level advantages in base clock and memory bandwidth but remains unverified in actual tests.