Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core i7-14700F occupy very different positions in the desktop processor landscape. The Core 5 223PQE is a compact 8-core, 16-thread part built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, while the Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh processor. The recorded data shows that the i7-14700F holds the advantage in nearly every measurable benchmark category, with the Core 5 223PQE offering no benchmark scores of its own in the database. The i7-14700F has a percentile ranking of 91 against all CPUs, while the Core 5 223PQE sits at the 50th percentile, indicating that the i7 occupies a far higher performance tier.

The use-case split is straightforward based on the benchmark data available. The i7-14700F delivers strong multi-threaded performance, as shown by scores such as 35122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 41317 in Passmark multithread. These numbers point to workloads that scale across many cores, such as rendering, video encoding, and scientific computation. The Core 5 223PQE, despite its lower core count, does have a higher base clock of 4.00 GHz compared to the i7-14700F's 2.10 GHz, and a similar boost clock at 5.50 GHz versus 5.40 GHz. This suggests the Core 5 could handle lightly threaded tasks competently, though without benchmark scores in the database, the data cannot verify this claim.

The i7-14700F also wins in single-threaded workloads according to the recorded measurements. Its Geekbench single-core score of 2429 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 are the only reference points available. The Core 5 223PQE has an empty benchmark array, so any direct comparison must rely solely on the i7-14700F's recorded results. The data indicates that users seeking maximum throughput across both single and multi-threaded applications should look to the i7-14700F, while the Core 5 223PQE remains an unverified quantity in this database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share several fundamental design traits but diverge significantly in core configuration and cache layout. Both are built on a 10 nm process node and fabricated by Intel, and both use the Intel Socket 1700. The Core 5 223PQE is codenamed Bartlett Lake and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the i7-14700F is codenamed Raptor Lake-R and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, with an architecture explicitly listed as Raptor Lake. The die size for the i7-14700F is recorded as 257 mm², while the Core 5 223PQE has no die size entry in the database.

Cache hierarchies are similar in per-core structure but differ at the shared level. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache, however, favors the i7-14700F with 33 MB shared, compared to 24 MB shared on the Core 5 223PQE. This larger L3 pool on the i7 likely benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, though the database does not provide specific measurements to confirm this.

Memory support is identical on paper: both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both feature ECC memory support. The Core 5 223PQE lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i7-14700F has no memory bandwidth figure recorded. PCIe capabilities match as well, with both offering Gen 5, 16 lanes from the CPU only. Integrated graphics differ notably: the Core 5 223PQE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. The Core 5 223PQE therefore carries a feature that the i7-14700F lacks, which could matter for systems without a discrete GPU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This absence of direct measurements means any comparison must rely on the i7-14700F's standalone benchmark scores and the architectural specifications of the Core 5 223PQE.

The i7-14700F's recorded scores provide a picture of its capability across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35122 in multi-core and 4958 in single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 14751 in multi-core and 2082 in single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3540 in multi-core and 499 in single-core. Geekbench results are 19620 in multi-core and 2429 in single-core. Passmark tests cover a range of workloads: multithread at 41317, single thread at 4257, integer math at 155808, floating point math at 107005, data compression at 505885, data encryption at 30144, extended instructions at 28564, find prime numbers at 176, physics at 2455, and random string sorting at 55918.

These numbers indicate a processor that performs strongly across diverse workloads. The nearest rivals in the database for the i7-14700F include the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53701 and a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 and 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 and 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 and 0.8%. The i7-14700F's average benchmark score is 53620, placing it slightly below the Xeon 6505P and slightly above the Xeon Phi 7290, the Ryzen 9 7900X, and the EPYC 7313P. This positioning confirms that the i7-14700F competes at a high level, even against server-class and high-end desktop parts.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for the two processors reveal several key differences beyond the obvious core count gap. The Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: 4.00 GHz for the Core 5 versus 2.10 GHz for the i7. Boost clocks are closer, at 5.50 GHz for the Core 5 and 5.40 GHz for the i7. Thermal design power also diverges, with the Core 5 rated at 125 W and the i7 at 65 W. This means the Core 5 draws a higher power budget despite having fewer cores, likely due to its higher base clock.

The i7-14700F has a larger shared L3 cache at 33 MB versus 24 MB on the Core 5, while per-core L1 and L2 caches match at 80 KB and 2 MB respectively. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel memory, and ECC memory, but only the Core 5 lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The integrated GPU situation is a notable differentiator: the Core 5 includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i7 has no integrated graphics. Both use the same socket and PCIe configuration, with Gen 5 and 16 CPU-only lanes.

Release dates differ by over two years. The i7-14700F was released on January 7, 2024, while the Core 5 223PQE is dated March 8, 2026. Production status for both is listed as Active. The launch MSRP for the i7-14700F is $359, and for the Core 5 223PQE it is $319. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not officially supported for either part. Part numbers differ as well: SA4QC for the Core 5 and SRN3Z for the i7.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core i7-14700F support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The recorded average benchmark score for the Intel Core i7-14700F is 53620, with a percentile ranking of 91 against all CPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has an average score of 53288, giving the i7 a 0.6% advantage.

Q: What is the base clock difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i7-14700F for users who need maximum processing throughput. Its 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with a 33 MB shared L3 cache and an average benchmark score of 53620, place it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark demonstrate strong performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The nearest rival comparisons show it performing slightly better than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and the AMD EPYC 7313P, which reinforces its high-end positioning.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database and sits at the 50th percentile. Its specifications suggest a different role: fewer cores but a higher base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which is marginally higher than the i7's 5.40 GHz. It also includes UHD Graphics 770, a feature absent from the i7-14700F. These traits might suit systems that do not require a discrete GPU or workloads that favor higher clock speeds over core counts, but without recorded measurements, the database cannot confirm any performance advantage.

The i7-14700F also carries a higher launch MSRP of $359 compared to $319 for the Core 5 223PQE, and it consumes less power at 65 W versus 125 W. The Core 5's higher TDP despite fewer cores is notable, and the absence of any benchmark data for it leaves a significant gap in the analysis. For any user prioritizing measured performance, the i7-14700F is the only option with verified results. The Core 5 223PQE remains a largely uncharacterized part in this database, and its actual performance cannot be assessed against the i7-14700F's recorded scores. The verdict from the available data is straightforward: the i7-14700F delivers proven, high-level performance across a broad range of workloads, while the Core 5 223PQE offers a higher base clock and integrated graphics but no recorded evidence of competitive throughput.