Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core i5-14400T

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete set of benchmark scores only for the Intel Core i5-14400T; the Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores in the current dataset. This means a direct numerical head-to-head comparison cannot be constructed from the measurements available. The i5-14400T's recorded scores establish a solid performance baseline, while the Core 5 223PQE's absence of scores leaves its measured performance undefined.

For the i5-14400T, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17189 and single-core score of 2426 indicate a strong all-around performer. The R20 results show 7219 multicore and 1018 single-core, while R15 returns 1732 multicore and 244 single-core. These scores place the i5-14400T at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 27166. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i9-9900K with an average score of 27097, which is a 0.3% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G at 27051, a 0.4% difference. The i5-14400T sits slightly below the Intel Core i7-13700H, which scores 27355, a -0.7% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G at 27382, a -0.8% delta. The margin between the i5-14400T and its closest competitors is remarkably narrow, all within 1% of each other, indicating that the i5-14400T delivers performance in line with established high-end processors from previous generations.

In the PassMark suite, the i5-14400T shows particular strength in data compression with a score of 235636, integer math at 65667, and floating point math at 49139. The multithread score of 20223 and single-thread score of 3512 confirm balanced throughput. The extended instructions score of 14562 and random string sorting at 25181 further detail its processing capabilities. The physics score of 1244 is comparatively modest, while data encryption at 13244 and find prime numbers at 73 round out the workload profile. Because the Core 5 223PQE has no benchmark entries, the data cannot confirm whether it would outperform or underperform these figures in any specific test.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 223PQE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Core 5 223PQE, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What is the performance percentile of the Intel Core i5-14400T?

A: The i5-14400T sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 27166.

Q: How does the i5-14400T compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14400T is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G. It trails the Intel Core i7-13700H by -0.7% and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G by -0.8%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Core 5 223PQE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the i5-14400T boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 223PQE and the i5-14400T have ECC memory support enabled.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor with measurable wins, as it has a full benchmark suite while the Core 5 223PQE has none. The i5-14400T delivers strong multicore performance through its Cinebench R23 score of 17189 and a PassMark multithread score of 20223, making it suitable for heavily threaded workloads such as rendering, compilation, or scientific computing. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2426 and PassMark single-thread score of 3512 indicate competent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications.

The Core 5 223PQE cannot be assigned any wins from the database because no benchmark scores exist for it. However, its specifications suggest potential advantages. The higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz compared to the i5-14400T's 4.50 GHz could translate to faster single-threaded execution, though this remains unverified by any measured score. The Core 5 223PQE also has a larger L3 cache at 24 MB shared versus 20 MB shared on the i5-14400T, which may benefit cache-sensitive workloads, but again, no data confirms this.

The i5-14400T wins in every category where a score exists, including all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests, plus all PassMark tests. The Core 5 223PQE wins in no measured category because the database contains no results for it.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The Core 5 223PQE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-14400T uses 10 cores and 16 threads. The Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, whereas the i5-14400T has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125, while the i5-14400T has a TDP of 35, a substantial difference indicating the i5-14400T is designed for much lower power draw.

Cache configurations differ notably. The Core 5 223PQE has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-14400T has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The i5-14400T has a recorded die size of 215 mm², while the Core 5 223PQE has no die size listed.

Memory support is identical in type, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. However, the Core 5 223PQE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i5-14400T has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. PCIe support matches as well, with both offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 223PQE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14400T includes UHD Graphics 730. Both processors use Intel Socket 1700 and are produced on a 10 nm process node by Intel.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 223PQE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation and carries the codename Bartlett Lake. The i5-14400T is part of the Core 14th Gen series, with the architecture listed as Raptor Lake and the codename Raptor Lake-R, specifically part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process node and manufactured by Intel, but the underlying design lineage differs.

The i5-14400T uses a hybrid core arrangement as indicated by its 10-core, 16-thread configuration, which implies a mix of performance and efficiency cores. The Core 5 223PQE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, suggesting all cores are uniform high-performance cores with Hyper-Threading. The Bartlett Lake generation is positioned as a distinct lineup from the Raptor Lake refresh, though the database does not specify the exact microarchitectural changes.

The Core 5 223PQE has a higher per-core L2 cache at 2 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14400T, and a larger L3 cache at 24 MB versus 20 MB. Both processors support ECC memory and use the same PCIe Gen 5 implementation with 16 lanes from the CPU. The i5-14400T has a measured die size of 215 mm², which is recorded, while the Core 5 223PQE has no die size data.

The integrated graphics differ in tier, with the Core 5 223PQE using UHD Graphics 770 and the i5-14400T using UHD Graphics 730. The release dates also differ: the Core 5 223PQE has a release date of 2026-03-08, while the i5-14400T was released on 2024-01-07.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-14400T is the only option with verified performance data. Its benchmark scores place it at the 79th percentile, with an average score of 27166, and it sits within 1% of four close rivals including the Intel Core i9-9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G. The i5-14400T demonstrates strong multicore capability through a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17189 and solid single-core performance at 2426. Its low TDP of 35 makes it an efficient choice for compact or power-limited desktop builds.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE offers no measured scores, so its actual performance cannot be confirmed from the database. Its specifications suggest it may have higher single-thread potential due to a 5.50 GHz boost clock and larger caches, but without benchmark data, any performance claim remains speculative. The higher TDP of 125 indicates it will draw substantially more power than the i5-14400T.

For users who require verified performance, the i5-14400T is the clear choice based on recorded data. For users who prioritize the Core 5 223PQE's higher clock speeds and larger cache, no database evidence supports a performance advantage. The i5-14400T also offers a lower TDP and an earlier release date, both confirmed in the records. The Core 5 223PQE remains an unmeasured part with promising specifications but no demonstrated results.