Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 5 223PQE and the Intel Core 7 360. The Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Core 7 360 has 17 recorded measurements. The Core 7 360 achieves an average benchmark score of 18374, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-13100 with an average score of 18380 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core 5 330 at 18345 with a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 with a delta of 0.3 percent, and the Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 with a delta of 0.4 percent.

The Core 7 360 delivers a multi-thread score of 15544 in PassMark, which places it between the Core i3-13100 and the Core 5 330 in overall database rankings. The single-thread PassMark score of 4274 confirms strong per-core performance for a 6-thread processor. In Cinebench R23, the Core 7 360 records 13634 multi-core and 1924 single-core. The R20 results show 5726 multi-core and 808 single-core, while R15 shows 1374 multi-core and 193 single-core. These scores indicate that the Core 7 360 competes directly with desktop quad-core parts despite its mobile positioning.

The Core 5 223PQE has zero recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals listed. The wins count is zero for both processors. Without direct measurements, a quantitative comparison cannot be established. The data shows that the Core 7 360 has a fully populated benchmark profile, while the Core 5 223PQE remains unmeasured in the database. The Core 7 360's percentile rank of 72 indicates it outperforms most recorded CPUs, but the Core 5 223PQE cannot be placed relative to it without score data.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process node, manufactured by Intel. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The thermal design power is 125 watts. The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The part number is SA4QC, and the launch MSRP is $319.

The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename with a 3 nm process node, also manufactured by Intel. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The thermal design power is 15 watts. The processor uses Intel BGA 1516 and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The part number is SAE3E, and the launch MSRP is $426.

The process node difference is substantial: 10 nm versus 3 nm. The Core 5 223PQE compensates with a much higher clock envelope, 4.00 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost, versus 1.50 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost for the Core 7 360. Thread count also differs significantly, 16 threads versus 6 threads. Cache allocation per core favors the Core 7 360, with 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core, while the Core 5 223PQE uses 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core. The shared L3 cache is much larger on the Core 5 223PQE at 24 MB versus 6 MB. Memory channels diverge, dual-channel for the Core 5 223PQE and single-channel for the Core 7 360. PCIe generation and lane count also differ, Gen 5 with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The integrated graphics solutions are distinct: UHD Graphics 770 versus Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The market segments differ, desktop versus mobile, which aligns with the socket and power specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE boosts to 5.50 GHz. The Intel Core 7 360 boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 360 does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does the cache hierarchy compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The Intel Core 7 360 has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 7 360?

A: The average benchmark score is 18374, with a 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the integrated graphics solution on each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core 7 360 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 223PQE | Intel Core 7 360 |

|---------------|---------------------|------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 6 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | $319 | $426 |

| Part Number | SA4QC | SAE3E |

The remaining fields match: both are manufactured by Intel, both have Active production status, both have locked multipliers, and both lack a listed architecture and transistors count.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PQE wins on raw compute resources. The 8 cores and 16 threads outnumber the 6 cores and 6 threads of the Core 7 360. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz exceeds the 4.80 GHz of the Core 7 360. The shared L3 cache of 24 MB is four times larger than the 6 MB on the Core 7 360. Memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel bus surpasses the 59.7 GB/s single-channel configuration. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes provides more connectivity headroom than Gen 4 with 6 lanes. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation-style workloads. The desktop socket allows for traditional cooling and board integration.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins on efficiency and platform features. The 15 watt TDP is dramatically lower than the 125 watt TDP of the Core 5 223PQE. The 3 nm process node enables a much smaller transistor footprint. Per-core cache is larger, with 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core versus 80 KB and 2 MB respectively. LPDDR5X memory support suits low-power mobile designs. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores represents a newer graphics architecture than UHD Graphics 770. The single-channel memory bus reduces power consumption while still delivering 59.7 GB/s. The mobile BGA package allows for compact system integration.

The recorded benchmark data only covers the Core 7 360. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13634 and single-core score of 1924 show a balanced profile. PassMark integer math at 34238 and floating point math at 44963 indicate solid arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 142877 and encryption score of 11164 demonstrate strong memory-intensive operations. The extended instructions score of 12390 confirms SIMD capability. The physics score of 1213 and prime number finding score of 120 reflect specific compute patterns. The random string sorting score of 17636 shows sorting efficiency. The average benchmark score of 18374 places it within 0.4 percent of the Core 3 305 and within 0.2 percent of the Core 5 330.

The Core 5 223PQE has no benchmark profile, so its measured performance cannot be stated. The specification sheet suggests it targets high-throughput desktop workloads where core count and memory bandwidth dominate. The Core 7 360, with its measured scores, suits power-constrained mobile workloads where per-core efficiency and low thermal output are critical. The data confirms that the Core 7 360 delivers competitive performance within its power class, while the Core 5 223PQE remains a specification-only entry in the database. The launch MSRP difference, $319 for the Core 5 223PQE and $426 for the Core 7 360, reflects the distinct positioning: the desktop part offers more cores and bandwidth at a lower price, while the mobile part commands a premium for its process node and integration.