Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 240H is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data, and its results are substantial across every tested workload. The database shows the 240H producing a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,764 points and a single-core score of 1,719 points. In Cinebench R20, it posts 8,562 multi-core and 1,208 single-core points, while in Cinebench R15 it scores 2,360 multi-core and 249 single-core points.

PassMark results for the 240H further illustrate its strengths. The processor achieves 23,975 in the multithread test and 3,782 in the single-thread test. Integer math reaches 80,396, floating point math hits 58,905, and extended instructions score 16,897. Data compression completes at 271,774, while data encryption posts 15,155. The random string sorting test returns 28,866, and prime number finding scores 102. Physics workloads score 1,723.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no benchmark entries in the database, so direct head-to-head comparisons are impossible from recorded measurements. The 223PQE appears with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs. The 240H, by contrast, shows an average benchmark score of 31,483 and sits at the 82nd percentile.

Looking at the 240H against its nearest rivals in the database, the delta percentages are minimal. The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 scores 31,473, a 0% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31,495, also 0% apart. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H scores 31,508, which is 0.1% higher than the 240H. The Intel Core i5-13500 scores 31,510, again 0.1% higher. These four processors form a tight cluster around 31,500 points, meaning the 240H is effectively tied with them in aggregate benchmark performance.

The 223PQE lacks any comparable scores, so its placement relative to the 240H cannot be established through measured data. What can be stated is that the 240H delivers a complete set of benchmark results across rendering, encryption, compression, and mathematical workloads, while the 223PQE has no recorded outputs.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 240H is the only option with measurable performance, and it demonstrates strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capability. Its 82nd percentile ranking places it above the majority of all CPUs in the database, and its average score of 31,483 matches or nearly matches several recent Intel Core Ultra and AMD Ryzen processors.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE presents no benchmark results, making any performance verdict impossible from the database. Its 50th percentile is a default position, not a measured outcome. Users seeking a processor with verified performance data should consider the 240H, as its scores are fully documented.

The 240H also carries a higher launch MSRP of $502, while the 223PQE has a launch MSRP of $319. The 240H targets mobile platforms with a 45 TDP, while the 223PQE is a desktop part with a 125 TDP. These differences suggest distinct usage scenarios, but the benchmark evidence only supports the 240H.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share several architectural traits but diverge in key areas. Both use a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. Both have the same L1 cache structure of 80 KB per core and the same L2 cache of 2 MB per core. Both share a 24 MB L3 cache.

The 223PQE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename, which falls under the Core 5 generation. The 240H uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename, belonging to the Core 7 generation under the Raptor Lake Refresh family. The 223PQE has no listed architecture field beyond its codename, while the 240H explicitly states Raptor Lake.

Core counts differ. The 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads. The extra two cores in the 240H likely contribute to its multi-threaded benchmark results, though the 223PQE has no scores to verify this.

Clock speeds also differ. The 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The 240H has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 223PQE starts at a higher base frequency and reaches a higher boost frequency, but again, no benchmark data confirms how these clocks translate into real-world performance.

Memory support is identical in type, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. However, the 223PQE has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the 240H has no bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory is supported by the 223PQE but not by the 240H.

PCIe capabilities differ. The 223PQE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the 240H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This makes the 223PQE more suitable for high-bandwidth expansion in a desktop context.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The 240H's graphics solution is designed for mobile efficiency, while the 223PQE's is a desktop-oriented implementation.

Specification Differences

The socket types are fundamentally different. The 223PQE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The 240H uses Intel BGA 1744, a mobile soldered platform. This dictates their market segments: the 223PQE is listed as Desktop, the 240H as Mobile.

Thermal design power differs significantly. The 223PQE has a TDP of 125, while the 240H has a TDP of 45. The desktop part draws considerably more power, consistent with its higher base clock and desktop cooling expectations.

Release dates are separated by over a year. The 223PQE has a release date of March 8, 2026. The 240H has a release date of December 17, 2024. The 223PQE is the newer product.

Launch MSRP figures are present for both. The 223PQE carries a launch MSRP of $319, and the 240H carries a launch MSRP of $502. The mobile processor is priced higher at launch despite its lower TDP.

Part numbers differ: the 223PQE is SA4QC, and the 240H is SRQ6TQ5ML. Both have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports user overclocking through multiplier adjustment.

The 223PQE has no architecture field listed, while the 240H explicitly lists Raptor Lake. The 223PQE's codename is Bartlett Lake, and the 240H's codename is Raptor Lake-H. The 223PQE's generation is listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake), and the 240H's generation is Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

Memory bandwidth is only specified for the 223PQE at 89.6 GB/s. The 240H lacks this data point. ECC support is exclusive to the 223PQE.

Both processors are marked as Active in production status, and neither has a series designation beyond its core naming.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H has 10 cores, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The 223PQE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the 240H boosts to 5.20 GHz. The 223PQE has a 0.30 GHz higher maximum clock speed.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 240H does not list ECC support.

Q: How do the two processors compare in benchmark scores?

A: The 240H has a full set of benchmark results with an average score of 31,483 and an 82nd percentile ranking. The 223PQE has no benchmark entries in the database, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile default.

Q: What are the socket and market segment differences?

A: The 223PQE uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop market. The 240H uses Intel BGA 1744 and targets the mobile market.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The 223PQE has a TDP of 125, while the 240H has a TDP of 45. The desktop part consumes significantly more power.

Q: What is the PCIe lane difference?

A: The 223PQE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The 240H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only).