Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core 5 330 Comparison

Intel Core 5 223PQE and Intel Core 5 330 are two active processors from Intel, but they target entirely different segments of the market. The 223PQE is a desktop part built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the 330 is a mobile processor designed for thin and light systems using the Intel BGA 1516 socket. The database only contains benchmark results for the Core 5 330, which means a direct numerical comparison of every workload is not possible. However, the recorded data for the 330, combined with the architectural specifications of both parts, allows for a clear analysis of their respective strengths.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database currently has no recorded scores for the Intel Core 5 223PQE. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its percentile ranking sits at 50. In contrast, the Intel Core 5 330 has a substantial set of measurements across Cinebench and PassMark tests, with an average benchmark score of 18345 and a percentile ranking of 72. This means the 330 outperforms 72 percent of all CPUs in the database, while the 223PQE has no comparable score to place it.

Without direct head-to-head results, the only numerical comparison that can be drawn is the 223PQE's lack of recorded performance data against the 330's established scores. For example, the 330 records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13150 and a single-core score of 1856. Its PassMark single-thread score is 4088, and its multi-thread score is 15471. These figures place the 330 in a competitive position relative to its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i3-14100 has an average score of 18318, which is 0.1 percent lower than the 330, and the Intel Core 7 360 sits at 18374, which is 0.2 percent higher. This tight grouping indicates that the 330 performs at a level very similar to these other Intel parts, despite being a low-power mobile chip.

The 223PQE, by contrast, offers no such data points. Its specifications suggest a high-performance desktop design, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and a thermal design power of 125 watts. These are characteristics of a part that would likely deliver strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, but the database lacks the measurements to confirm this. The 330, with a base clock of just 1.50 GHz and a boost of 4.60 GHz, relies on its 3 nm process node and efficient architecture to achieve its scores.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 330 clearly wins in the mobile and efficiency segment. Its 15 watt TDP makes it suitable for laptops and compact systems where power consumption is a primary concern. The recorded benchmarks show it handling a variety of workloads with competence. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5523 and single-core score of 779, along with its Cinebench R15 results of 1325 multi-core and 186 single-core, demonstrate balanced performance for everyday tasks and productivity applications. The PassMark data compression score of 145287 and floating point math score of 43885 indicate solid computational throughput for a processor in its class.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE wins in the desktop performance segment based on its specifications. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads, double the thread count of the 330, which has 6 cores and 6 threads. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz is nearly a full gigahertz higher than the 330's 4.60 GHz, and its 125 watt TDP allows for sustained high-frequency operation. The 223PQE also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the 330, making it more suitable for workstation-style applications where data integrity is critical. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, compared to 59.7 GB/s for the 330, further supports its role as a higher-performance desktop option.

The 330 counters with its integrated graphics. It uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores, while the 223PQE relies on UHD Graphics 770. The newer graphics architecture in the 330 likely provides better integrated graphics performance, though the database does not include specific graphics benchmarks for either part. The 330 also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in mobile platforms and offers high bandwidth in a low-power package.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 330?

A: The Intel Core 5 330 has an average benchmark score of 18345, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 330 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 330 scores 0.1 percent higher than the Intel Core i3-14100, which has an average score of 18318. It scores 0.2 percent lower than the Intel Core 7 360, which has an average score of 18374, and 0.2 percent lower than the Intel Core i3-13100, which has an average score of 18380. It scores 0.2 percent higher than the Intel Core 3 305, which has an average score of 18302.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 223PQE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 223PQE. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 330 does not.

Q: What is the thermal design power of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, and the Intel Core 5 330 has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel Core 5 330 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification. The Intel Core 5 223PQE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 330 uses 6 cores and 6 threads. The 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, compared to 1.50 GHz and 4.60 GHz for the 330. Thermal design power is 125 watts for the 223PQE and 15 watts for the 330. The 223PQE uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the 330 uses Intel BGA 1516. The 223PQE is a desktop processor, and the 330 is a mobile processor.

Memory support also differs. The 223PQE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The 330 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a single-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The 223PQE supports ECC memory, while the 330 does not. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the 223PQE, while the 330 uses Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for the 223PQE and Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores for the 330. The 223PQE has a launch MSRP of $319, and the 330 has a launch MSRP of $309.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is significant. The Intel Core 5 223PQE is built on Intel's 10 nm process node and uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Intel Core 5 330 uses the 3 nm process node and the Wildcat Lake codename. The manufacturing foundry for both is Intel, but the process node difference is substantial, with the 330 using a much more advanced fabrication technology.

Cache configurations also differ considerably. The 223PQE has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 24 MB. The 330 has an L1 cache of 192 KB total, an L2 cache of 2.5 MB total, and a shared L3 cache of 6 MB. The 223PQE's larger L3 cache is consistent with its desktop positioning, while the 330's smaller cache aligns with its mobile efficiency goals.

The generation labels reflect the different design lineages. The 223PQE is listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake), and the 330 is listed as Core 5 (Wildcat Lake). The 330's 3 nm process, combined with its 15 watt TDP, indicates a design focused on power efficiency, while the 223PQE's 10 nm process and 125 watt TDP prioritize raw performance. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports unlocked overclocking. The 223PQE carries the part number SA4QC, and the 330 carries the part number SAE3G.