Intel Core 5 221TE vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 221TE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.8 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14700T

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,139
2,618
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
160
369
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
4,748
10,911
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
670
1,540
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
11,305
25,980
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,596
3,667
passmark_data_compression
156,682
354,216
passmark_data_encryption
8,963
21,277
passmark_extended_instructions
9,655
20,052
passmark_find_prime_numbers
59
145
passmark_floating_point_math
31,661
79,042
passmark_integer_math
42,303
113,854
passmark_multithread
13,301
30,571
passmark_physics
977
1,946
passmark_random_string_sorting
16,929
38,546
passmark_single_thread
1,734
3,905
passmark_singlethread
1,734
3,905

Analysis: Intel Core 5 221TE vs Intel Core i7-14700T

The Intel Core 5 221TE and Intel Core i7-14700T are both desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they deliver vastly different performance profiles. The data shows a one-sided contest: the i7-14700T wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons. However, the Core 5 221TE is not without its own merits, particularly in efficiency-oriented configurations. This analysis uses the recorded database measurements to break down where each chip stands.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unambiguous. The Intel Core i7-14700T leads in every single workload recorded, with margins ranging from roughly half to nearly two-thirds. The most significant gap appears in the PassMark integer math test, where the i7-14700T scores 113,854 against the Core 5 221TE’s 42,303, a delta of -62.8% for the 221TE. This indicates a massive advantage in raw arithmetic throughput, a common driver for scientific and financial simulation workloads.

Cinebench results follow a nearly identical pattern. In the multi-core tests, the i7-14700T scores 2,618 in R15, 10,911 in R20, and 25,980 in R23. The Core 5 221TE manages 1,139, 4,748, and 11,305 respectively. Each of these results shows the 221TE trailing by approximately -56.5%. The single-core Cinebench tests deliver a similar story: the i7-14700T scores 369 in R15, 1,540 in R20, and 3,667 in R23, while the 221TE scores 160, 670, and 1,596, again with deltas around -56.5%.

Beyond synthetic rendering, the PassMark suite reveals real-world application differences. In data compression, the i7-14700T posts 354,216 versus 156,682, a -55.8% delta. Data encryption shows the i7-14700T at 21,277 against 8,963, a -57.9% delta. Extended instruction set performance (SIMD, AVX) favors the i7-14700T by -51.9%, scoring 20,052 versus 9,655. The floating-point math test shows a -59.9% delta, with scores of 79,042 and 31,661. Prime number finding, a classic memory-latency and branch-prediction test, sees the i7-14700T score 145 versus 59, a -59.3% delta.

The multithreaded PassMark score, which aggregates many parallel workloads, shows the i7-14700T at 30,571 versus 13,301 for the 221TE, a -56.5% delta. Physics simulation, representing rigid body dynamics, favors the i7-14700T at 1,946 versus 977, a -49.8% delta, the smallest margin of the entire comparison. Random string sorting, a proxy for database index operations, shows 38,546 for the i7-14700T and 16,929 for the 221TE, a -56.1% delta. Single-thread performance, as measured by PassMark, shows the i7-14700T at 3,905 versus 1,734, a -55.6% delta.

The aggregate average benchmark score confirms the hierarchy. The i7-14700T sits at 41,914, while the Core 5 221TE averages 17,860. In percentile terms, the i7-14700T ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the 221TE lands in the 71st percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a manufacturing foundation but diverge sharply in configuration. Both are built on Intel’s 10 nm process node by Intel’s own foundry. However, the i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake-R architecture, while the 221TE uses Bartlett Lake. The die sizes differ accordingly: the i7-14700T measures 257 mm², while the 221TE is smaller at 215 mm².

The core count is the primary architectural separator. The i7-14700T offers 20 cores and 28 threads, while the 221TE provides 10 cores and 16 threads. This doubling of physical cores explains the consistent multi-core margins. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: the i7-14700T has 2 MB per core, while the 221TE has 1.25 MB per core. The shared L3 cache also favors the i7-14700T with 33 MB versus 24 MB.

Clock speeds present an interesting contrast. The 221TE has a higher base clock of 1.80 GHz, while the i7-14700T starts lower at 1.30 GHz. The boost clock reverses this, with the i7-14700T reaching 5.20 GHz compared to the 221TE’s 5.00 GHz. The lower base clock on the i7-14700T contributes to its lower TDP of 35 watts, while the 221TE is rated at 45 watts.

Memory support is identical: both accept DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The 221TE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i7-14700T’s bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is also the same: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ, with the 221TE using UHD Graphics 730 and the i7-14700T using UHD Graphics 770.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-14700T wins in every measured category, but the degree of its advantage varies. The most pronounced lead is in integer math, where the delta reaches -62.8%. This suggests the i7-14700T is particularly strong in workloads like code compilation, encryption algorithms, and financial modeling that rely heavily on integer operations. The floating-point math delta of -59.9% also indicates a substantial edge in scientific computing and 3D rendering tasks.

The i7-14700T’s smallest margin is in physics simulation at -49.8%. While still a decisive win, this relatively smaller gap suggests that physics engines, which often depend on single-thread latency and specific instruction patterns, benefit less from the core count advantage. Nevertheless, the i7-14700T’s superior single-thread scores (3,905 vs 1,734 in PassMark) still give it the lead here.

For the Core 5 221TE, the recorded data shows no benchmark wins. However, its profile is not without purpose. The higher base clock of 1.80 GHz, combined with a 45-watt TDP, indicates a processor that maintains a more consistent baseline frequency under light loads. In scenarios where power draw is capped by a system’s cooling solution or power supply limitations, the 221TE may sustain its base performance more reliably. Its smaller die size also suggests a lower manufacturing cost, though pricing is not a factor in this analysis.

The data also places each chip in different competitive contexts. The 221TE’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (delta -0.2%), the Intel Core 5 120U (delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core 7 350 (delta 0.5%). This places it in the mid-range desktop tier. The i7-14700T’s nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i7-12850HX (delta 0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (delta -0.3%), positioning it in a higher performance class.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is clear: the Intel Core i7-14700T is the superior processor in every recorded test. With 20 cores versus 10, 28 threads versus 16, and a 33 MB L3 cache versus 24 MB, it delivers roughly double the multi-threaded throughput. Its single-thread performance is also far ahead, evidenced by the -56.5% delta in Cinebench R23 single-core and -55.6% in PassMark single-thread. The i7-14700T’s 88th percentile ranking versus the 221TE’s 71st percentile confirms its higher standing in the overall CPU landscape.

The Core 5 221TE, despite its losses, offers a specific trade-off: a higher base clock (1.80 GHz) and a higher TDP (45 watts) than the i7-14700T (1.30 GHz and 35 watts). For systems where the workload is consistently light and the processor idles or runs at base clocks, the 221TE may avoid the lower base frequency penalty of the i7-14700T. However, any workload that scales with cores or boosts to higher frequencies will strongly favor the i7-14700T.

Users seeking maximum throughput in rendering, data processing, or parallel computing should select the i7-14700T. Users constrained by a 35-watt power envelope or who prioritize a higher base clock for latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks might consider the 221TE, but they must accept a significant performance deficit in all other areas. The data does not support a scenario where the 221TE outperforms the i7-14700T.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the Intel Core 5 221TE has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The i7-14700T boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Core 5 221TE boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: Which CPU has a higher base clock?

A: The Core 5 221TE has a higher base clock at 1.80 GHz, compared to the i7-14700T’s 1.30 GHz.

Q: How much larger is the L3 cache on the i7-14700T?

A: The i7-14700T has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 5 221TE has 24 MB.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The i7-14700T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Core 5 221TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core 5 221TE and the i7-14700T support ECC memory.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields:

  • Cores: 10 (Core 5 221TE) vs 20 (Core i7-14700T)
  • Threads: 16 vs 28
  • Base Clock: 1.80 GHz vs 1.30 GHz
  • Boost Clock: 5.00 GHz vs 5.20 GHz
  • TDP: 45 watts vs 35 watts
  • Architecture: Bartlett Lake vs Raptor Lake
  • Codename: Bartlett Lake vs Raptor Lake-R
  • Die Size: 215 mm² vs 257 mm²
  • L2 Cache: 1.25 MB per core vs 2 MB per core
  • L3 Cache: 24 MB shared vs 33 MB shared
  • Integrated Graphics: UHD Graphics 730 vs UHD Graphics 770
  • Release Date: 2025-01-12 vs 2024-01-07
  • Launch MSRP: $232 vs $384
  • Part Number: SRVQS vs SRN41
  • Percentile: 71st vs 88th
  • Average Benchmark Score: 17,860 vs 41,914

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 221TE
i7-14700T
Core Specs
Cores
10
20 +100.0%
Threads
16
28 +75.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
1.8
1.3 -27.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
1.8
1.3 -27.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
18
13 -27.8%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
35 -22.2%
PL1
45 W
35 W
PL2
106 W
106 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
1300 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
900 MHz up to 3.7 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.0 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$232
$384
Part Number
SRVQS
SRN41
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core 5 221TE Details View Core i7-14700T Details