Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Processor U301L Comparison

Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Processor U301L: a desktop versus mobile matchup with a wide gulf in core counts, clock speeds, and measured performance. The Core 5 213PTE is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop part built on Bartlett Lake, while the U301L is a 5-core, 6-thread mobile chip from the Raptor Lake-PS family. The database contains a full benchmark profile for the Core 5 213PTE, but no recorded scores for the U301L, so the analysis relies on the available data for the former and the specification sheet for the latter.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 213PTE wins in every measurable category for which data exists. It dominates multi-threaded workloads through raw core and thread counts, delivering 8 cores and 16 threads against the U301L's 5 cores and 6 threads. In single-threaded tasks, the Core 5 213PTE also holds the advantage with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 2.20 GHz for the U301L. The desktop part also carries 24 MB of shared L3 cache, triple the 8 MB found on the mobile chip.

The U301L wins in power efficiency and thermal envelope. Its 15-watt TDP is one-third of the Core 5 213PTE's 45 watts, making it suitable for compact or passively cooled systems where heat output matters more than peak performance. The U301L also uses a smaller L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 2 MB, but that is a design trade-off for lower power consumption.

The market segments make the choice clear. The Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor with PCIe Gen 5 support and 16 CPU lanes, while the U301L is a mobile processor with PCIe Gen 4 and 8 lanes. The desktop part also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the mobile chip. For workloads that rely on memory integrity, such as error-sensitive compute tasks, the Core 5 213PTE is the only option here.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Core 5 213PTE boosts up to 5.20 GHz. The U301L boosts up to 2.20 GHz, which is 2.36 times lower.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The U301L has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, or one-third of the desktop part's capacity.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the U301L does not.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 watts. The U301L has a TDP of 15 watts, which is significantly lower and indicates a much lower power draw.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924 and sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The U301L has no recorded average benchmark score in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Core 5 213PTE and the U301L. The Core 5 213PTE has a full set of 17 recorded scores, while the U301L has zero. The comparison therefore uses the Core 5 213PTE's absolute scores alongside its specification advantages.

In multi-core Cinebench tests, the Core 5 213PTE delivers strong results. It scores 2192 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 9135 in R20 multi-core, and 21751 in R23 multi-core. These numbers reflect the 8-core, 16-thread configuration and the 5.20 GHz boost capability. The U301L, with only 6 threads and a 2.20 GHz boost, would be expected to score substantially lower, though no direct figure exists.

Single-core performance also favors the desktop part. The Core 5 213PTE scores 309 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1289 in R20 single-core, and 3070 in R23 single-core. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3718, which places it in the upper range of desktop processors.

In PassMark workloads, the Core 5 213PTE shows particular strength in integer math (93109) and floating-point math (71722). Data compression scores 261083, while encryption scores 14413. Extended instructions score 16146, and random string sorting scores 30106. The multithread score is 25590, and physics scores 2199. Prime number finding scores 157.

The U301L has no recorded scores in any of these tests. Its 5-core, 6-thread layout with a 1.20 GHz base clock and 2.20 GHz boost clock suggests it would trail in every metric, but the database lacks the numbers to quantify the margin. The Core 5 213PTE's 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs further underscores the gap, while the U301L sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ markedly: 8 cores and 16 threads for the Core 5 213PTE versus 5 cores and 6 threads for the U301L. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz against 1.20 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.20 GHz against 2.20 GHz. TDP figures are 45 watts versus 15 watts.

Cache layouts also differ. The Core 5 213PTE has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The U301L has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Memory support is identical in type: both accept DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel buses. The Core 5 213PTE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the U301L has no recorded bandwidth figure. ECC memory support is present on the Core 5 213PTE but absent on the U301L.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The Core 5 213PTE uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The U301L uses Gen 4 with 8 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 5 213PTE has UHD Graphics 730, while the U301L has UHD Graphics 64EU.

Market segments differ, with the Core 5 213PTE classified as a desktop part and the U301L as mobile. Release dates are also distinct: the Core 5 213PTE released on March 8, 2026, and the U301L on April 7, 2024. Launch MSRP figures are $221 for the Core 5 213PTE and $107 for the U301L. Both processors have locked multipliers and are currently in active production.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 213PTE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename, representing the Core 5 generation. The U301L uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename with a Raptor Lake architecture and is labeled as Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel, so the underlying lithography is the same.

The architectural split lies in core organization and cache hierarchy. The Core 5 213PTE's Bartlett Lake design provides 8 cores with 2 MB of L2 per core, totaling 16 MB of L2, and a shared 24 MB L3 pool. The U301L's Raptor Lake-PS design provides 5 cores with 1.25 MB of L2 per core, totaling 6.25 MB of L2, and a shared 8 MB L3 pool. The L3 difference is a direct result of the core count disparity and the target market.

Feature support also diverges at the architecture level. The Core 5 213PTE enables ECC memory, which is typically reserved for workstation or server-oriented workloads. The U301L omits ECC entirely. The PCIe implementation differs as well: Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the desktop part versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the mobile part. This affects available bandwidth for add-in cards and storage devices.

Integrated graphics differ in execution unit count. The Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the U301L uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The lower EU count on the mobile chip aligns with its power target. The TDP difference between 45 watts and 15 watts is the most consequential architectural trade-off, as it dictates cooling requirements and system form factor.

The release timeline places the U301L earlier at 2024, with the Core 5 213PTE arriving in 2026. Both remain active in production, but the newer desktop part represents a later design iteration within Intel's 10 nm process family. The part numbers differ as well: SA4QM for the Core 5 213PTE and SRPKFQ5CW for the U301L.