Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between the Intel Core 5 213PTE and the Intel Processor N150. Across all four head-to-head tests, the Core 5 213PTE wins outright, with no single test favoring the N150.

The largest margin appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Core 5 213PTE scores 21,751 compared to the N150's 2,590.5, a delta of 739.6%. This result reflects the substantial difference in core count and thread support between the two processors. The Core 5 213PTE fields 8 cores and 16 threads, while the N150 operates with 4 cores and 4 threads.

Single-core performance also favors the Core 5 213PTE, though by a smaller margin. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 5 213PTE scores 3,070 versus 935 for the N150, a delta of 228.3%. The boost clock difference contributes here, with the Core 5 213PTE reaching 5.20 GHz compared to the N150's 3.60 GHz.

Cinebench R15 results follow the same pattern. In multi-core, the Core 5 213PTE scores 2,192 against 422.5 for the N150, a delta of 418.8%. In single-core, the Core 5 213PTE scores 309 versus 153.15, a delta of 101.8%. The single-core R15 margin is the smallest of the four tests, but still a clear win for the Core 5 213PTE.

The average benchmark score metric reinforces this hierarchy. The Core 5 213PTE holds an average benchmark score of 32,924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The N150's average score is 1,025, which lands in the 28th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core 5 213PTE, such as the Intel Core i7-12700 and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, sit within a narrow band around its average score, with deltas of -0.1% and -0.5% respectively. The N150's nearest rivals, including the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and Intel Core i3-4340, show deltas of 0.1% and -0.1%, indicating a tightly clustered performance class.

PassMark results for the Core 5 213PTE further illustrate its capabilities. It scores 25,590 in multi-thread, 3,718 in single-thread, 93,109 in integer math, and 71,722 in floating point math. Data compression reaches 261,083, while encryption scores 14,413. The N150 has no recorded PassMark entries in the database, so comparisons rely on the Cinebench tests.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different architectural families. The Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is listed under the Core 5 generation, while the N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture and is classified under Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N). Both are built on a 10 nm process node by Intel, which means the manufacturing technology is identical, but the design priorities differ substantially.

Core topology separates them clearly. The Core 5 213PTE provides 8 cores and 16 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The N150 provides 4 cores and 4 threads, with no multithreading support. This explains the multi-core benchmark dominance of the Core 5 213PTE, as it can handle twice the threads across a larger core pool.

Cache allocation also differs. The Core 5 213PTE uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The N150 uses 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 213PTE's per-core L2 design and larger L3 pool give it a substantial cache advantage for workloads that benefit from repeated data access.

Memory support diverges as well. The Core 5 213PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, delivering 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The N150 also supports DDR4 and DDR5, plus LPDDR5, but uses a single-channel memory bus with 38.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory bandwidth difference is exactly 2x, which aligns with the channel count disparity. ECC memory is supported on the Core 5 213PTE but not on the N150.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The Core 5 213PTE offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the N150 offers PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only). This positions the Core 5 213PTE for higher-throughput peripherals and expansion, while the N150 is limited to older, slower interconnect standards.

The integrated graphics are identical in name, with both processors featuring UHD Graphics 730. However, the surrounding platform constraints differ. The Core 5 213PTE targets the desktop segment and uses Intel Socket 1700, while the N150 targets the mobile segment and uses Intel BGA 1264. The Core 5 213PTE has a 45 W TDP, while the N150 has a 6 W TDP, indicating a stark difference in power envelope and thermal design.

The release dates also differ. The Core 5 213PTE was released on March 8, 2026, while the N150 was released on November 19, 2024. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are marked as active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The data indicates that the Core 5 213PTE wins in every recorded benchmark category. There are no tests in the database where the N150 outperforms it. This makes a use-case split based on benchmark wins straightforward: the Core 5 213PTE is the choice for compute-intensive workloads, while the N150's advantages lie outside the recorded benchmarks.

For multi-core rendering, the Core 5 213PTE's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,751 demonstrates its capability. The N150's score of 2,590.5 is less than one-eighth of that figure, so any workload that scales with cores and threads will heavily favor the Core 5 213PTE. The same applies to Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the Core 5 213PTE scores 2,192 versus 422.5.

For single-threaded tasks, the Core 5 213PTE still leads, but the margin narrows. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core 5 213PTE scores 3,070 against 935 for the N150. The N150's lower boost clock of 3.60 GHz and lack of multithreading constrain its performance in both single-thread and multi-thread scenarios.

The N150's 6 W TDP and mobile market segment suggest it is designed for low-power, fanless, or battery-constrained environments. The Core 5 213PTE's 45 W TDP and desktop segment indicate it is meant for systems with active cooling and higher power budgets. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor.

The N150's support for LPDDR5 memory, which the Core 5 213PTE lacks, may benefit certain mobile platforms. However, the single-channel memory bus limits the practical bandwidth to 38.4 GB/s, which is half that of the Core 5 213PTE. For embedded or low-power applications where power draw is the primary constraint, the N150's 6 W TDP could be the deciding factor, but the benchmark data does not quantify this.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core 5 213PTE in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Core 5 213PTE scores 21,751, while the N150 scores 2,590.5. The Core 5 213PTE is 739.6% ahead in this test.

Q: Do both processors use the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both list UHD Graphics 730 as their integrated GPU. The surrounding platform and power characteristics differ, but the graphics name is identical.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has a dual-channel memory bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The N150 has a single-channel memory bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Core 5 213PTE provides exactly twice the memory bandwidth.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory. The N150 does not list ECC support in the database.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32,924, placing it in the 83rd percentile. The N150 has an average benchmark score of 1,025, placing it in the 28th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Core 5 213PTE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the N150 uses 4 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz for the Core 5 213PTE and 0.10 GHz for the N150. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz versus 3.60 GHz. TDP is 45 W for the Core 5 213PTE and 6 W for the N150.

The socket types differ: the Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the N150 uses Intel BGA 1264. The codenames are Bartlett Lake for the Core 5 213PTE and Twin Lake for the N150. The generation labels also differ, with Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) for the former and Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) for the latter.

Cache hierarchies diverge. The Core 5 213PTE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The N150 has 96 KB L1 per core, 2 MB shared L2, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 for both, but the N150 also adds LPDDR5. Memory bus is dual-channel for the Core 5 213PTE and single-channel for the N150. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s. ECC support is present only on the Core 5 213PTE.

PCIe specifications differ: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core 5 213PTE, Gen 3 with 9 lanes for the N150. The market segments are Desktop for the Core 5 213PTE and Mobile for the N150. Release dates are March 8, 2026, for the Core 5 213PTE and November 19, 2024, for the N150. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 213PTE is $221, while the N150 has no recorded launch MSRP. Part numbers are SA4QM for the Core 5 213PTE and SRPNR for the N150.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a clear separation in performance class. The Intel Core 5 213PTE delivers multi-core and single-core results that place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,924. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-12700 and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, sit within 0.5% of its average score, indicating it is positioned in a competitive mid-to-high-end desktop tier.

The Intel Processor N150, with an average benchmark score of 1,025, ranks in the 28th percentile. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and Intel Core i3-4340, are within 0.2% of its score, showing that it occupies a low-power entry-level segment. The N150's 6 W TDP and mobile socket make it suitable for compact or battery-powered systems, but the recorded benchmarks show no scenario where it outperforms the Core 5 213PTE.

For users selecting between these two processors, the data directs the Core 5 213PTE to any workload that requires sustained compute performance, multithreading, or high memory bandwidth. The N150 is the choice for systems where the low power envelope and mobile form factor are the primary requirements, but the performance gap of 739.6% in multi-core Cinebench R23 and 228.3% in single-core Cinebench R23 cannot be bridged by the N150's efficiency advantages. The Core 5 213PTE also offers ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5, features absent from the N150. Based strictly on the recorded measurements, the Core 5 213PTE is the superior processor in every benchmarked dimension.