Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V Comparison

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is a mobile chip from the Lunar Lake family. The benchmark data shows a clear split in strengths: the Core 5 213PTE dominates in multi-threaded and heavily parallel workloads, while the Core Ultra 9 288V takes the lead in specific single-threaded and prime-number calculations. This analysis walks through the recorded measurements to clarify which processor wins where and what the underlying architecture indicates.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct use cases. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the choice for desktop users running multi-core-heavy applications. It wins 14 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with its largest margin being a 113.7% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, deliver substantially higher throughput in rendering, compression, and encryption tasks. The Core 5 213PTE also holds an 83rd percentile rank among all CPUs in the database, compared to the Core Ultra 9 288V's 76th percentile.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is better suited for mobile scenarios where power efficiency and single-thread responsiveness matter more. It wins the PassMark single-thread test by 13%, scoring 4274 versus 3718, and also leads in prime number finding by 19.5%. Its 30 W TDP and 3 nm process node from TSMC indicate a design focused on efficiency. The Core Ultra 9 288V's average benchmark score of 23219 places it near the Intel Core i9-11900F, which scores 23254, a delta of -0.2%. The Core 5 213PTE, with an average score of 32924, sits just 0.1% below the Intel Core i7-12700 in its rival group.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing nodes and foundries. The Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel, while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. This node difference explains part of the efficiency gap: the Core Ultra 9 288V has a 30 W TDP, whereas the Core 5 213PTE has a 45 W TDP. The smaller node allows the mobile chip to maintain competitive single-thread performance at lower power.

Core counts are identical at 8, but threading differs. The Core 5 213PTE supports 16 threads, meaning it has hyper-threading, while the Core Ultra 9 288V has only 8 threads. This directly explains the multi-core benchmark gaps. The Core 5 213PTE also has a higher boost clock at 5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz, though its base clock is lower at 2.10 GHz compared to 3.30 GHz.

Cache configurations vary significantly. The Core 5 213PTE uses an 80 KB L1 cache per core, a 2 MB L2 cache per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 9 288V has a larger 192 KB L1 per core, a 2.5 MB L2 per core, but only a 12 MB shared L3. The larger L3 on the Core 5 213PTE likely contributes to its strong showing in data compression and integer math, where it leads by 40% and 111.5% respectively.

Memory support also differs. The Core 5 213PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The Core Ultra 9 288V uses LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a higher bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, but no ECC support. The Core 5 213PTE offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core Ultra 9 288V offers PCIe Gen 5 with only 4 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Arc 140V.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 213PTE wins across almost every multi-threaded and math-intensive workload. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21751 versus 10178, a 113.7% advantage. PassMark integer math shows a 111.5% lead, with scores of 93109 versus 44019. Data compression sees a 40% win, floating-point math a 20.5% win, and physics a 34.3% win. These results indicate the Core 5 213PTE is designed for sustained throughput across many threads.

The Core Ultra 9 288V wins in two specific areas: single-thread performance and prime number calculation. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4274 beats the Core 5 213PTE's 3718 by 13%. In the find prime numbers test, it scores 195 versus 157, a 19.5% advantage. These wins suggest the Lunar Lake architecture has stronger per-core efficiency for certain arithmetic operations, likely due to its newer process node and higher base clock.

In Cinebench single-core tests, the Core 5 213PTE still wins, but by smaller margins. It leads R15 single-core by 2.5% (309 versus 301.5), R20 single-core by 29.3% (1289 versus 997), and R23 single-core by 57.4% (3070 versus 1950). The PassMark single-thread result contradicts this trend, showing the Core Ultra 9 288V ahead. The mixed results indicate that the two processors have different strengths depending on the specific instruction mix and workload characteristics.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 16 threads across its 8 cores, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V has 8 threads across its 8 cores.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest recorded delta is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Core 5 213PTE leads by 113.7%, scoring 21751 versus 10178.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 9 288V ever beat the Core 5 213PTE?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 9 288V wins the PassMark single-thread test by 13% (4274 versus 3718) and the PassMark find prime numbers test by 19.5% (195 versus 157).

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Core Ultra 9 288V has a higher memory bandwidth at 136.5 GB/s, compared to the Core 5 213PTE's 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses a 3 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924, and the Core Ultra 9 288V has an average score of 23219.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows the most dramatic difference. The Core 5 213PTE scores 21751, which is 113.7% higher than the Core Ultra 9 288V's 10178. This test benefits directly from the Core 5 213PTE's 16 threads and larger 24 MB L3 cache. PassMark integer math shows a similar magnitude of difference, with the Core 5 213PTE scoring 93109 versus 44019, a 111.5% lead. These two tests demonstrate the Core 5 213PTE's clear advantage in parallel integer workloads.

The Core Ultra 9 288V's wins are smaller in percentage but consistent. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4274 is 13% higher than the Core 5 213PTE's 3718. In the find prime numbers test, it scores 195 versus 157, a 19.5% advantage. These wins indicate that the Lunar Lake architecture's per-core efficiency can outperform the Bartlett Lake design in specific scalar workloads, even though the Core 5 213PTE leads in most other single-threaded Cinebench tests.

Other notable wins for the Core 5 213PTE include Cinebench R20 multi-core at 9135 versus 7069 (29.2% lead), PassMark multi-thread at 25590 versus 19810 (29.2% lead), and PassMark data compression at 261083 versus 186521 (40% lead). The Core 5 213PTE also wins PassMark data encryption by a narrow 1.9% margin (14413 versus 14141), showing that even in less parallel workloads, its additional threads provide a small edge. The overall win count stands at 14 for the Core 5 213PTE and 3 for the Core Ultra 9 288V.

Specification Differences

The socket types differ completely: the Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Intel BGA 2833. The Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor, and the Core Ultra 9 288V is a mobile processor. The Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 W, the Core Ultra 9 288V has a TDP of 30 W. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz versus 3.30 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz.

Cache structures differ as noted: the Core 5 213PTE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 9 288V has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. Memory support shows DDR4/DDR5 for the Core 5 213PTE and LPDDR5X for the Core Ultra 9 288V. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s versus 136.5 GB/s. ECC support is present on the Core 5 213PTE but absent on the Core Ultra 9 288V. PCIe lanes are 16 for the Core 5 213PTE and 4 for the Core Ultra 9 288V, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 for the Core 5 213PTE and Arc 140V for the Core Ultra 9 288V. The Core 5 213PTE has a launch MSRP of $221. The Core Ultra 9 288V has a release date of 2024-09-23, while the Core 5 213PTE has a release date of 2026-03-08.