Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Comparison

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H are both 83rd-percentile processors, but they achieve that standing through fundamentally different strategies. The Core 5 213PTE is a desktop part built for raw, sustained throughput, while the Core Ultra 7 155H is a mobile chip designed for efficiency and versatility. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the Core 5 213PTE dominates in single-threaded and multi-threaded compute workloads, while the Core Ultra 7 155H counters in data handling and encryption tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 213PTE is the clear winner for CPU-bound productivity and creative work. It takes 12 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, and its victories are often decisive. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21751 against the Ultra 7’s 15028, a 44.7% advantage. That margin is enormous for modern processors and indicates a major lead in rendering, video encoding, and any workload that scales across all cores. The single-core results are even more lopsided; the Core 5 213PTE’s 3070 score in Cinebench R23 single-core beats the Ultra 7’s 1743 by 76.1%. This makes the Core 5 213PTE the superior choice for lightly-threaded tasks like legacy software, spreadsheet calculations, and responsive everyday use.

The Core 5 213PTE also dominates in math-heavy and physics-based workloads. It wins PassMark floating point math by 12.6% (71722 vs 63703) and integer math by 7.2% (93109 vs 86870). Its lead in PassMark physics is a substantial 27.3% (2199 vs 1727), and it is 38.9% faster in the find prime numbers test (157 vs 113). These results point to a chip that handles scientific simulations, financial modeling, and engineering applications with far greater ease. The overall PassMark multithread score also favors the Core 5 213PTE, at 25590 versus 24873, a 2.9% edge.

The Core Ultra 7 155H wins the remaining five benchmarks, and they are all data-oriented tasks. Its largest win comes in PassMark data encryption, where it scores 16358 versus 14413, an 11.9% advantage. It also leads in data compression (277353 vs 261083, a 5.9% win) and random string sorting (31990 vs 30106, also 5.9%). Its margin in extended instructions is slim at 1.9% (16456 vs 16146). These wins suggest the Ultra 7 155H is better suited for database operations, file archiving, and security-related workloads that rely on cryptographic operations. The Core Ultra 7 155H also wins the Cinebench R15 multi-core test (2450 vs 2192), a 10.5% margin, but this is an outlier compared to its losses in newer Cinebench versions.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different Intel design philosophies. The Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process node, while the Core Ultra 7 155H is Meteor Lake on a 7 nm node. The Core Ultra 7 155H is part of the Core Ultra Series 1, marking a distinct generation shift. The market segments differ as well: the Core 5 213PTE is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 155H is a mobile chip on Intel BGA 2049.

Core counts diverge significantly. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores and 22 threads. That extra core count does not translate to a performance win for the Ultra 7 in most tests, as the Core 5 213PTE’s higher clock speeds compensate. The Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz versus the Ultra 7’s 4.80 GHz, and it has a higher base clock of 2.10 GHz versus 3.80 GHz, but the boost is what matters for burst workloads.

Cache hierarchies are similar in total L3 capacity, with both offering 24 MB shared, but the per-core L1 and L2 allocations differ. The Core 5 213PTE provides 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core; the Core Ultra 7 155H has 112 KB of L1 and also 2 MB of L2 per core. Memory support also differs: the Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 155H is DDR5-only. The Ultra 7 has a higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which the Ultra 7 does not.

The TDP ratings tell a story of power versus portability. The Core 5 213PTE has a 45-watt TDP, while the Core Ultra 7 155H is rated at 28 watts. That lower TDP allows the Ultra 7 to fit in thinner laptops, but it also explains its performance deficit in sustained multithreaded loads. The integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 7 155H features the more powerful Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. PCIe lane counts also vary, with the Core 5 213PTE offering 16 CPU lanes versus 8 for the Ultra 7.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is the 76.1% single-core lead for the Core 5 213PTE in Cinebench R23 (3070 vs 1743). This is not a marginal victory; it is a generational gap in per-thread performance. In practical terms, the Core 5 213PTE will feel snappier in almost every application that relies on a single thread, from web browsing to compiling code. The Cinebench R15 single-core test confirms the trend, with the Core 5 213PTE winning 309 to 255, a 21.2% margin.

In multi-core workloads, the picture is more complex. The Core Ultra 7 155H wins Cinebench R15 multi-core (2450 vs 2192, a 10.5% lead), but the Core 5 213PTE reverses that in R20 (9135 vs 8754, a 4.4% win) and crushes it in R23 (21751 vs 15028, a 44.7% win). This suggests that the Core 5 213PTE scales better as the workload duration increases, while the Ultra 7’s 28-watt TDP causes it to throttle earlier in longer tests.

The PassMark suite shows a similar pattern of specialization. The Core 5 213PTE wins single-thread performance by 7.2% (3718 vs 3468), and it carries that lead into multithread (25590 vs 24873). Its physics score is 27.3% higher (2199 vs 1727), and it leads floating point by 12.6% and integer by 7.2%. The Ultra 7’s wins are all in memory and data manipulation: encryption (11.9%), compression (5.9%), random string sorting (5.9%), and extended instructions (1.9%). These are workloads where the Ultra 7’s higher memory bandwidth and different core arrangement provide an edge.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster for single-threaded applications?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE is significantly faster. It wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 76.1% (3070 vs 1743) and PassMark single-thread by 7.2% (3718 vs 3468).

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 155H ever beat the Core 5 213PTE?

A: Yes, but only in specific data-oriented tasks. The Ultra 7 wins data encryption by 11.9% (16358 vs 14413), data compression by 5.9% (277353 vs 261083), and random string sorting by 5.9% (31990 vs 30106). It also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 10.5% (2450 vs 2192).

Q: How do their core counts compare, and does it matter?

A: The Core Ultra 7 155H has 16 cores and 22 threads, while the Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite having half the cores, the Core 5 213PTE wins most multi-core benchmarks due to its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 7 155H has a TDP of 28 watts. The lower TDP of the Ultra 7 makes it suited for mobile designs, but it also limits sustained performance.

Q: Which chip has better memory support?

A: The Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 155H supports only DDR5. However, the Ultra 7 has higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which the Core 5 213PTE does not.

Q: What are the release dates and market segments?

A: The Core 5 213PTE is a desktop processor released on 2026-03-08, while the Core Ultra 7 155H is a mobile processor released on 2023-12-13. Both are currently active in production.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155H has 16 cores and 22 threads. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz for the Core 5 213PTE and 3.80 GHz for the Ultra 7, but boost clocks favor the Core 5 213PTE at 5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. TDP ratings are 45 watts for the desktop part and 28 watts for the mobile part.

The sockets are incompatible: the Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Core Ultra 7 155H uses Intel BGA 2049. Process nodes differ, with the Core 5 213PTE on 10 nm and the Ultra 7 on 7 nm. Cache allocations show 80 KB L1 per core for the Core 5 213PTE versus 112 KB for the Ultra 7; both have 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3.

Memory support is another divider. The Core 5 213PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 is DDR5-only. Memory bandwidth is higher on the Ultra 7 at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported only on the Core 5 213PTE. PCIe lanes differ, with 16 CPU lanes on the Core 5 213PTE and 8 on the Ultra 7. Integrated graphics are also distinct: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 213PTE versus Arc Xe-LPG 128EU on the Ultra 7. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 213PTE is $221, and for the Core Ultra 7 155H it is $503.