Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V Comparison

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V are two very different processors that share the same core count but little else. The 213PTE is a desktop part built on an older node with a high power envelope, while the 228V is a mobile-focused chip designed for efficiency. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the 213PTE dominates in multithreaded and heavily parallel workloads, while the 228V takes narrow wins in single-threaded PassMark tests and prime number finding. This analysis walks through the recorded measurements to show where each processor delivers its strengths.

FAQ

Q: How do the two processors compare in overall average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924, which places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has an average score of 21440, placing it at the 75th percentile. The 213PTE leads by a substantial margin of approximately 53.5% in this aggregate metric.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V boosts to 4.50 GHz. Both share the same base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: Both processors have 8 cores. The 213PTE supports 16 threads, while the 228V supports 8 threads. This means the 213PTE has simultaneous multithreading enabled, effectively doubling its thread count.

Q: How do the L3 cache sizes compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a shared L3 cache of 24 MB. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has a much smaller shared L3 cache of 8 MB. The 213PTE offers three times the L3 capacity.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V does not. This makes the 213PTE more suitable for error-sensitive computing tasks.

Q: What are the process nodes used by each chip?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE is built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins 14 of the 17 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons. Its victories are broad, covering all Cinebench tests, data compression, encryption, extended instructions, floating point math, integer math, multithreading, physics, and random string sorting. The largest margins appear in multithreaded rendering and integer math, where the 213PTE leverages its 16 threads and higher boost clock to pull far ahead.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V wins only 3 comparisons: PassMark find prime numbers, PassMark single thread, and the duplicate PassMark singlethread entry. These wins are narrow. In the single-thread PassMark test, the 228V scores 3836 against 3718 for the 213PTE, a delta of 3.1%. In prime number finding, the 228V scores 168 versus 157, a 6.5% advantage. These are the only areas where the mobile chip shows superiority.

The use-case split is clear. The 213PTE is the choice for rendering, compilation, data compression, and any workload that scales with threads and large caches. The 228V holds a slight edge in light single-threaded tasks and specific integer operations, but its wins are too small to define a practical advantage in most scenarios.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is based on Bartlett Lake, a desktop-oriented design that uses Intel Socket 1700. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Core Ultra 5 228V is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 and uses the Lunar Lake architecture, which is designed for mobile devices. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm node and uses Intel BGA 2833, a soldered mobile socket.

The 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, meaning each core supports two threads. The 228V also has 8 cores but only 8 threads, indicating no hyper-threading. Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The 213PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3. The 228V has 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 8 MB of shared L3. The larger L1 and L2 on the 228V may help with low-latency access, but the 213PTE's much larger L3 pool benefits larger working sets.

Memory support also diverges. The 213PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The 228V's memory support is listed as unknown and depends on the motherboard. Its memory bandwidth is not recorded. The 213PTE also supports ECC memory, which the 228V does not.

The integrated graphics differ. The 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the 228V uses Arc 130V. PCIe lanes also differentiate the two: the 213PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the 228V provides Gen 5 with only 4 CPU lanes. The 213PTE is a desktop part with a 45 W TDP, while the 228V is a mobile part with a 17 W TDP.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights the key recorded specifications where the two processors differ.

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core Ultra 5 228V |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 17 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Architecture | Bartlett Lake | Lunar Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm (Intel) | 3 nm (TSMC) |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | Unknown, depends on motherboard |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 4 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc 130V |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-09-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not available |

The 213PTE also has a higher percentile ranking (83rd versus 75th) and a higher average benchmark score (32924 versus 21440). Both processors have locked multipliers and are classified as active in production.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive results come from multithreaded Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the 213PTE scores 21751 against 9932 for the 228V, a margin of 119%. This is the single largest delta in the dataset. Cinebench R20 multicore shows a 40.7% lead for the 213PTE with scores of 9135 versus 6491. Cinebench R15 multicore shows a 45.9% lead, with 2192 versus 1502.5.

Single-core Cinebench results also favor the 213PTE. In Cinebench R23 singlecore, the 213PTE scores 3070 versus 1758, a 74.6% advantage. Cinebench R20 singlecore shows a 40.7% gap with 1289 versus 916. Cinebench R15 singlecore shows a 15.7% lead with 309 versus 267.

PassMark integer math is the second-largest win. The 213PTE scores 93109 against 39679, a 134.7% lead. Data compression shows a 50.1% gap, with 261083 versus 173924. Floating point math favors the 213PTE by 34.5%, with 71722 versus 53310. Multithread scores show a 40.4% lead for the 213PTE, 25590 versus 18227. Physics results show a 43% lead, 2199 versus 1538. Random string sorting shows a 41.6% lead, 30106 versus 21254. Data encryption shows a 10.6% lead, 14413 versus 13032. Extended instructions show a 9.1% lead, 16146 versus 14801.

The 228V's wins are smaller. In PassMark find prime numbers, it scores 168 against 157, a 6.5% advantage. In PassMark single thread, it scores 3836 against 3718, a 3.1% advantage. The same result appears under the duplicate test name passmark_singlethread.

The 213PTE's wins are consistently large, often exceeding 40%. The 228V's wins are all below 7%, indicating that its strengths are marginal. The data confirms that the 213PTE is the stronger performer in nearly every measured category.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear division of roles. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the superior processor for multithreaded workloads. Its 16 threads, 24 MB L3 cache, and 45 W TDP allow it to deliver more than double the Cinebench R23 multicore score of the 228V. It also leads by over 100% in integer math and by roughly 50% in data compression. Users running rendering, compilation, or heavy data processing should select the 213PTE.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is a mobile processor with a 17 W TDP. It wins only in narrow single-threaded PassMark tests and prime number finding. Its 3 nm process node and larger L1/L2 caches do not translate into broad benchmark superiority. The 228V is the appropriate choice only for scenarios where power consumption is the primary constraint and the workload is light.

The 213PTE also holds the advantage in overall percentile ranking, placing at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs compared to the 75th percentile for the 228V. Its average benchmark score of 32924 is roughly 54% higher. The 228V's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i9-11900H, while the 213PTE sits near the Intel Core i7-12700 and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. For any workload where performance matters more than power draw, the 213PTE is the stronger option.