Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core Ultra 5 225T reveals a split decision, with the Ultra 5 225T taking 12 wins against 5 for the Core 5 213PTE. The Cinebench suite is entirely one-sided: across R15, R20, and R23, the Ultra 5 225T wins both single-core and multi-core tests by a consistent 1% margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ultra scores 21971 versus 21751, while in single-core it posts 3101 against 3070. These are narrow margins, but they hold across every Cinebench iteration.

The Passmark suite tells a more dramatic story. The Core 5 213PTE delivers its largest victory in integer math, scoring 93109 against the Ultra's 59543, a commanding 56.4% advantage. Data compression also favors the Core 5 by 11.6% (261083 versus 233998). Other wins for the Core 5 include multithread (25590 versus 25358, a 0.9% edge), physics (2199 versus 2053, up 7.1%), and random string sorting (30106 versus 28774, ahead 4.6%).

The Ultra 5 225T counters with substantial wins in several Passmark workloads. The single-thread test shows a 14.5% lead (4348 versus 3718). Prime number finding is the biggest gap, with the Ultra scoring 284 versus 157, a 44.7% advantage. Data encryption goes to the Ultra by 21.2% (18289 versus 14413), and extended instructions favor it by 19.6% (20083 versus 16146). Floating point math also lands with the Ultra, 82751 versus 71722, a 13.3% margin.

The average benchmark score places the Core 5 213PTE at 32924, which sits close to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i7-12700 at 32942 (a 0.1% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079 (0.5% higher). The Ultra 5 225T averages 30468, putting it near the Intel Core i9-11980HK at 30422 and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS at 30390. The percentile rankings are close, with the Core 5 at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs and the Ultra at the 82nd.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent distinct design approaches from Intel. The Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename while the Ultra 5 225T is built on Arrow Lake-S architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. The process nodes differ sharply: the Core 5 is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process, while the Ultra 5 uses TSMC's 3 nm node. The Ultra 5 packs 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, figures not listed for the Core 5.

Core and thread configurations diverge significantly. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, leveraging hyper-threading. The Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores but only 10 threads, indicating a design without simultaneous multithreading. Despite fewer threads, the Ultra still edges ahead in most Cinebench tests, suggesting higher per-core efficiency.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Core 5 provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 5 offers larger per-core allocations: 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2, but a smaller 20 MB shared L3. The memory subsystem sees the Ultra 5 supporting only DDR5, while the Core 5 accepts both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth favors the Ultra at 102.4 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5. ECC memory is supported on the Core 5 but not on the Ultra 5.

Socket compatibility separates the two completely. The Core 5 uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 requires Intel Socket 1851. PCIe lanes also differ, with the Core 5 offering 16 Gen 5 lanes and the Ultra 5 providing 20 Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics are another differentiator: the Core 5 includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Ultra 5 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU.

Clock speeds show a trade-off. The Core 5 has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost of 5.20 GHz. The Ultra 5 runs higher at base (2.50 GHz) but lower at boost (4.90 GHz). The Core 5's higher boost likely contributes to its strong integer and compression results, while the Ultra's higher base clock helps in sustained single-thread workloads. The thermal design power is 45 W for the Core 5 and 65 W for the Ultra 5.

The release timing places the Core 5 213PTE later, with a release date of 2026-03-08, while the Ultra 5 225T launched on 2024-12-31. The market segment for both is Desktop, and both are listed as Active in production. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks in this comparison?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins 12 benchmarks, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE wins 5. The Ultra 5 takes all six Cinebench tests and six Passmark tests.

Q: Where does the Intel Core 5 213PTE show its biggest advantage?

A: The largest margin for the Core 5 is in Passmark integer math, where it scores 93109 versus 59543 for the Ultra 5, a 56.4% lead. It also wins data compression by 11.6% and physics by 7.1%.

Q: How large is the Ultra 5 225T's single-thread advantage?

A: In Passmark single-thread testing, the Ultra 5 scores 4348 versus 3718 for the Core 5, a 14.5% difference. Cinebench single-core tests show a smaller 1% edge for the Ultra.

Q: Do the two processors use the same socket?

A: No. The Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 225T uses Intel Socket 1851. They are not interchangeable.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 225T supports DDR5 only. The Ultra 5 has higher memory bandwidth at 102.4 GB/s compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5.

Q: How do the core counts and threads compare?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads. Despite fewer threads, the Ultra 5 wins most multi-core benchmarks by a small margin.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core Ultra 5 225T |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Arrow Lake-S |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | Not listed | 243 mm² |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not listed |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE excels in workloads that rely on integer arithmetic and data manipulation. Its 56.4% lead in integer math and 11.6% advantage in data compression indicate strength in tasks like database operations, file compression, and general productivity software that depends on integer throughput. The physics benchmark win (7.1%) and random string sorting (4.6%) reinforce this profile. The multithread score of 25590, slightly ahead of the Ultra's 25358, suggests the 16 threads provide an edge in heavily threaded scenarios that scale with thread count.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T dominates in encryption and instruction-heavy workloads. Its 21.2% lead in data encryption and 19.6% advantage in extended instructions point to stronger cryptography and SIMD processing. The 44.7% margin in prime number finding indicates superior algorithmic efficiency per core. The single-thread score of 4348 versus 3718 shows a 14.5% advantage in lightly threaded applications, and the floating point lead of 13.3% favors scientific and media workloads.

The Cinebench results are nearly identical, with the Ultra 5 winning each test by 1%. This means both processors deliver comparable rendering performance in applications like 3D modeling and video encoding. The Ultra 5's higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 2.10 GHz likely explains its slight edge in sustained multi-core rendering, while the Core 5's higher boost of 5.20 GHz versus 4.90 GHz may benefit short burst workloads.

The overall benchmark averages show the Core 5 213PTE at 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Ultra 5 225T averages 30468, sitting at the 82nd percentile. The difference in average score is approximately 8%, but the application-specific results show much larger swings in either direction. For integer-heavy desktop tasks and compression, the Core 5 213PTE is clearly stronger. For encryption, single-thread responsiveness, and floating point, the Ultra 5 225T has the advantage. Both processors remain active in production, and the choice between them depends on which workload profile matters more.