Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL Comparison

Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL are two desktop processors from Intel that target different segments of the performance spectrum. The database records a complete set of benchmark results for the Core 5 213PTE, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL currently has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The Core 5 213PTE, by contrast, sits at the 83rd percentile with an average benchmark score of 32924. This comparison relies on the available recorded data, architectural specifications, and the limited performance metrics for the Ultra part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has 14 cores and 18 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ultra 5 135HL offers a higher core count but fewer additional threads relative to cores.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 135HL has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core 5 213PTE holds the advantage in both base and boost frequencies.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the Core Ultra 5 135HL has 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The difference is 6 MB in favor of the Core 5 213PTE.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL does not support ECC memory.

Q: What socket types do these processors use?

A: The Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Core Ultra 5 135HL uses Intel Socket 1851. These sockets are not interchangeable.

Q: How do their integrated graphics compare?

A: The Core 5 213PTE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL includes Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. The Ultra part has a more advanced graphics architecture, but no benchmark data is available to quantify the difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent distinct architectural generations from Intel. The Core 5 213PTE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, with a generation listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake), and it is manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 135HL belongs to the Core Ultra Series 1, uses the Meteor Lake architecture, and carries the Meteor Lake-PS codename. Its process node is 7 nm, also from Intel. The process node difference suggests the Ultra 5 135HL uses a more advanced fabrication technology, though the Core 5 213PTE compensates with higher clock speeds.

Core organization differs significantly. The Core 5 213PTE offers 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating a traditional hyperthreading design where each core supports two threads. The Core Ultra 5 135HL provides 14 cores and 18 threads, which implies a hybrid or heterogeneous core arrangement common in newer Intel designs, where not all cores contribute equally to thread count. The L1 cache also differs: the Core 5 213PTE has 80 KB per core, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL has 112 KB per core. Both share a 2 MB per core L2 cache. The L3 cache is larger on the Core 5 213PTE at 24 MB shared versus 18 MB shared on the Ultra 5 135HL.

Memory support diverges. The Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL supports DDR5 only, with the note that support depends on the motherboard. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The memory bandwidth differs: the Core 5 213PTE is rated at 76.8 GB/s, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL reaches 89.6 GB/s. The Ultra part has a higher theoretical memory bandwidth despite the smaller L3 cache.

PCIe capabilities differ as well. The Core 5 213PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Core Ultra 5 135HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Core 5 213PTE a substantial advantage in PCIe bandwidth and lane count for expansion. Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Core Ultra 5 135HL uses Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. The latter is a more modern GPU architecture, but without benchmark scores, its relative performance remains unquantified.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the Core Ultra 5 135HL has an empty benchmark array. Consequently, direct numerical comparisons are impossible. However, the Core 5 213PTE has extensive benchmark results, and its nearest rivals provide context for interpreting its performance level.

The Core 5 213PTE scores 2192 in Cinebench R15 multicore and 309 in Cinebench R15 singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it records 9135 multicore and 1289 singlecore. Cinebench R23 results show 21751 multicore and 3070 singlecore. PassMark tests reveal a multithread score of 25590 and a single thread score of 3718 (also listed as 3718 for passmark_singlethread). Additional PassMark subtests include data compression at 261083, data encryption at 14413, extended instructions at 16146, find prime numbers at 157, floating point math at 71722, integer math at 93109, physics at 2199, and random string sorting at 30106.

The average benchmark score for the Core 5 213PTE is 32924, positioning it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i7-12700 with an average score of 32942 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 with a delta of 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079 with a delta of -0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G at 33089 with a delta of -0.5%. These deltas show the Core 5 213PTE is within half a percent of all four rivals, making it statistically tied with each in overall average score. For instance, it trails the Ryzen 7 8700G by 0.5% and the Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 0.5%, while it leads the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.3% and sits 0.1% behind the Core i7-12700.

Because the Core Ultra 5 135HL has no benchmark scores, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50. The database has no nearest rivals for it, and there are zero wins recorded for either side in head-to-head testing. The only available performance indicator for the Ultra 5 135HL is its percentile placement, which is far below the Core 5 213PTE’s 83rd percentile, but this may reflect a lack of data rather than actual performance parity.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specification fields. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL has 14 cores and 18 threads. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz versus 1.70 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.20 GHz versus 4.60 GHz, both favoring the Core 5 213PTE. TDP is identical at 45 watts for both.

Socket types differ: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 5 213PTE and Intel Socket 1851 for the Core Ultra 5 135HL. The architecture field is null for the Core 5 213PTE, while the Ultra 5 135HL lists Meteor Lake. Codename differs: Bartlett Lake versus Meteor Lake-PS. The generation differs: Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) versus Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake-PS). Process nodes are 10 nm versus 7 nm. Foundry is Intel for both.

Cache configurations vary. L1 cache is 80 KB per core on the Core 5 213PTE and 112 KB per core on the Ultra 5 135HL. L2 cache is identical at 2 MB per core. L3 cache is 24 MB shared versus 18 MB shared. Memory support differs: the Core 5 213PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 135HL supports DDR5 only, dependent on motherboard. Memory bus is dual-channel for both. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is true for the Core 5 213PTE and false for the Ultra 5 135HL.

PCIe specifications differ: Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 versus Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. Market segment is Desktop for both. Production status is Active for both. Release dates differ: the Core 5 213PTE was released on 2026-03-08, while the Ultra 5 135HL was released on 2024-04-07. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 213PTE is $221, while the Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded launch MSRP. Multiplier unlocked is false for both. Part numbers are SA4QM for the Core 5 213PTE and SRN33 for the Ultra 5 135HL.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to the Intel Core 5 213PTE as the more established performer. Its benchmark results place it at the 83rd percentile, with an average score of 32924, and it trades blows within 0.5% of four strong rivals including the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Core i7-12700. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz, 24 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support give it clear structural advantages. The Core Ultra 5 135HL, with 14 cores and 18 threads, offers more cores and a newer 7 nm process, plus higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s and a more advanced Arc Xe-LPG 128EU integrated GPU. However, its complete absence of benchmark scores and 50th percentile ranking mean the database cannot confirm any performance benefit from those architectural features. Buyers needing a proven, high-boost desktop processor with ECC support and PCIe Gen 5 should favor the Core 5 213PTE. Those prioritizing core count, integrated graphics capability, or the newer Meteor Lake architecture may consider the Ultra 5 135HL, but only with the understanding that its performance remains unmeasured in the database. The data verdict is clear: the Core 5 213PTE delivers verified performance, while the Core Ultra 5 135HL is an unquantified alternative.