Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL present a stark contrast in measured performance. Benchmark data exists for the Core 5 213PTE across a broad suite of Cinebench and PassMark tests, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence of data for the Ultra 5 125UL means every head-to-head comparison is one-sided by default.

The Core 5 213PTE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,751 points and a single-core score of 3,070 points. Its Cinebench R20 results show 9,135 multi-core and 1,289 single-core, while Cinebench R15 lands at 2,192 multi-core and 309 single-core. In PassMark testing, the Core 5 213PTE posts 25,590 in multithread, 3,718 in single-thread, 93,109 in integer math, and 71,722 in floating point math. Additional PassMark scores include 261,083 in data compression, 14,413 in data encryption, 16,146 in extended instructions, 157 in find prime numbers, 2,199 in physics, and 30,106 in random string sorting.

Because the Core Ultra 5 125UL has no benchmark entries, the database assigns it an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile ranking of 50 among all CPUs. The Core 5 213PTE, by comparison, holds a percentile of 83. The average benchmark score for the Core 5 213PTE is 32,924, placing it in a tight cluster with several known rivals. The Intel Core i7-12700 scores 32,942, a delta of -0.1 percent relative to the Core 5 213PTE. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, which is 0.3 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G both score 33,079 and 33,089 respectively, each sitting 0.5 percent ahead of the Core 5 213PTE.

The Core 5 213PTE thus lands within one percentage point of four established desktop and mobile processors, indicating its performance profile is competitive with that tier of hardware. The Core Ultra 5 125UL, with no scores recorded, cannot be placed in any such comparison.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear selection for workloads that depend on raw compute throughput. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the only processor in this pairing with any recorded benchmark results, and its scores are substantial across both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. The Core Ultra 5 125UL offers no measured performance evidence, so any user prioritizing verified compute capability would choose the Core 5 213PTE.

The Core 5 213PTE also carries a higher percentile rank of 83 compared to the Ultra 5 125UL's 50. That 33-point gap reflects the availability of strong benchmark data for one part and none for the other. The Core Ultra 5 125UL may have merits in other dimensions, such as power characteristics or platform features, but the database shows no performance results to support a selection on that basis.

For users who need a processor with demonstrated Cinebench and PassMark results, the Core 5 213PTE is the only option with evidence. The Core Ultra 5 125UL is a valid product listing, but its benchmark profile is empty, making any performance-based comparison impossible. The verdict from the recorded data is unambiguous: the Core 5 213PTE wins all measurable categories by default.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design families and target different platform positions. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation of that family. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL uses the Meteor Lake architecture with the Meteor Lake-PS codename, part of the Core Ultra Series 1 generation, and is fabricated on a 7 nm process node, also at Intel.

Core counts differ significantly. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core Ultra 5 125UL has 12 cores but only 14 threads, indicating a mix of core types that does not double thread count. Clock speeds also diverge. The Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 125UL has a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Cache layouts are different as well. The Core 5 213PTE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 125UL has 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, but only 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 213PTE therefore has twice the shared L3 capacity.

Memory support separates the two as well. The Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel operation and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 125UL supports DDR5 only, with capacity depending on the motherboard, also dual-channel, but with a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs in generation and lane count. The Core 5 213PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Core Ultra 5 125UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL uses Arc Xe-LPG 64EU.

Platform sockets are not interchangeable. The Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL uses Intel Socket 1851. Thermal design power is markedly different. The Core 5 213PTE is rated at 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 125UL is rated at 15 watts. Both processors are active in production, both have locked multipliers, and both target the desktop market segment. The Core 5 213PTE launched in March 2026 with a launch MSRP of $221. The Core Ultra 5 125UL launched in April 2024 with a launch MSRP of $309.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL has 12 cores, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL support ECC memory?

A: No. The database lists ECC memory support as true for the Intel Core 5 213PTE and false for the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL.

Q: What is the thermal design power of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 watts, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which processor has more shared L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, twice the 12 MB found on the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL.

Q: Why does the database show no benchmark scores for the Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the Core Ultra 5 125UL, giving it an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark scores and a percentile ranking of 83.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins every category with recorded performance data. In multi-threaded workloads, its Cinebench R23 score of 21,751 and PassMark multithread score of 25,590 demonstrate strong parallel throughput. In single-threaded tasks, its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,070 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,718 show high per-core capability. Specialized workloads also favor the Core 5 213PTE: PassMark data compression at 261,083, data encryption at 14,413, extended instructions at 16,146, floating point math at 71,722, and integer math at 93,109.

The Core 5 213PTE also holds the advantage in memory flexibility with support for both DDR4 and DDR5, whereas the Core Ultra 5 125UL supports DDR5 only. The Core 5 213PTE offers a higher PCIe generation with Gen 5 and more CPU lanes at 16, compared to Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the Core Ultra 5 125UL. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Core 5 213PTE.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL does hold advantages in specific hardware specifications. It has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 213PTE. It has 12 cores compared to 8, a larger L1 cache per core at 112 KB versus 80 KB, and a more advanced 7 nm process node versus 10 nm. Its 15 watt TDP is one-third that of the Core 5 213PTE's 45 watt rating, which may appeal to low-power system designs. Its Arc Xe-LPG 64EU integrated graphics represent a different GPU tier than the UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 213PTE.

However, none of those Ultra 5 125UL advantages translate into measured benchmark wins because no benchmark results exist for it in the database. The Core Ultra 5 125UL wins only in specification-level comparisons such as core count, memory bandwidth, process node, L1 cache size, integrated graphics branding, and thermal envelope. For any performance metric recorded by the database, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the sole winner.