Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core i9-14900KS Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a comprehensive sweep by the Intel Core i9-14900KS across all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The Intel Core 5 213PTE does not register a single win in any test, with the i9-14900KS leading by margins ranging from 22.8% to 69.8%.

The largest single-test gap appears in PassMark data encryption, where the i9-14900KS scores 47,717 against the Core 5's 14,413, a delta of -69.8% from the perspective of the Core 5. Data compression shows a similar pattern, with the i9-14900KS at 803,368 versus 261,083, a 67.5% deficit for the Core 5. Random string sorting follows closely, with the i9-14900KS at 89,789 against 30,106, a 66.5% gap. Extended instructions also favor the i9-14900KS heavily, 45,524 versus 16,146, a 64.5% difference.

In the Cinebench suite, the margins are consistent and steep. The R15 multicore test shows 5,140 versus 2,192, a 57.4% lead. The R15 single-core test repeats the exact same percentage, 725 versus 309. R20 multicore delivers 21,417 versus 9,135, a 57.3% gap, while R20 single-core shows 3,023 versus 1,289, again 57.4%. R23 multicore reaches 50,995 versus 21,751, a 57.3% difference, and R23 single-core hits 7,199 versus 3,070, a 57.4% margin.

The PassMark multithread test shows 60,012 versus 25,590, a 57.4% lead for the i9-14900KS. Integer math delivers 212,644 versus 93,109, a 56.2% gap. Floating point math follows with 153,975 versus 71,722, a 53.4% difference. The narrowest gaps appear in PassMark physics and prime number finding. Physics shows 3,381 versus 2,199, a 35% lead, and prime numbers shows 244 versus 157, a 35.7% margin. Single-thread performance, measured by both PassMark single_thread and singlethread entries, shows 4,815 versus 3,718, a 22.8% gap, the smallest relative difference in the entire comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The data does not provide any benchmark category where the Intel Core 5 213PTE takes a win. The i9-14900KS dominates every recorded test, from single-core throughput to heavily threaded workloads. For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded performance, the i9-14900KS delivers between 53.4% and 69.8% higher scores across PassMark workloads, and between 57.3% and 57.4% higher scores in Cinebench multicore tests. The R23 multicore score of 50,995 versus 21,751 indicates a processor that handles heavily parallel rendering or compilation tasks with substantially more headroom.

For single-thread responsiveness, the i9-14900KS also leads, with a 22.8% advantage in PassMark single-thread scores and a 57.4% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core. The gap in single-thread tests is smaller than in multi-thread tests, but it remains decisive. The Core 5 213PTE, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, cannot match the 24-core, 32-thread configuration of the i9-14900KS in any measured workload. The closest contest appears in PassMark physics and prime number finding, where the i9-14900KS leads by 35% and 35.7% respectively, but even these represent clear victories for the higher-end part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same Intel Socket 1700 and the same 10 nm process node, both fabricated by Intel. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and both include ECC memory support. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes, CPU only.

The core configurations differ sharply. The Core 5 213PTE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i9-14900KS uses 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz for the Core 5 and 3.20 GHz for the i9-14900KS. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 6.20 GHz respectively. The Core 5 carries a 45 W TDP, whereas the i9-14900KS carries a 150 W TDP, a difference that reflects the substantial performance gap.

Cache hierarchies show both processors with 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core. The L3 cache differs: the Core 5 has 24 MB shared, while the i9-14900KS has 36 MB shared. The i9-14900KS also lists a die size of 257 mm²; the Core 5 does not report a die size.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i9-14900KS uses UHD Graphics 770. The Core 5 is based on Bartlett Lake architecture, while the i9-14900KS uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. The Core 5 is not multiplier-unlocked; the i9-14900KS is multiplier-unlocked, which allows overclocking. The Core 5 has part number SA4QM, and the i9-14900KS has part number SRN7R. Release dates differ: the Core 5 launched on 2026-03-08, and the i9-14900KS on 2024-03-13. Memory bandwidth is listed as 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5; the i9-14900KS does not report a memory bandwidth figure.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS boosts to 6.20 GHz, and the Intel Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has 36 MB shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: Are both CPUs on the same socket?

A: Yes, both use Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: Both support ECC memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has an average benchmark score of 81,127, and the Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32,924.

Q: How does the single-core performance compare in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS scores 7,199, and the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 3,070, a 57.4% lead for the i9-14900KS.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i9-14900KS wins every recorded comparison, with margins that range from 22.8% in single-thread tests to 69.8% in data encryption. Its 24 cores, 32 threads, 6.20 GHz boost clock, and 36 MB L3 cache provide a decisive advantage across all workloads. The percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms this: the i9-14900KS sits at the 96th percentile, while the Core 5 213PTE sits at the 83rd percentile.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE, with 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.20 GHz boost, and 24 MB L3 cache, remains a functional desktop processor. Its average benchmark score of 32,924 places it near rivals such as the Intel Core i7-12700 at 32,942 (a -0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33,079 (a -0.5% delta). The i9-14900KS, with an average score of 81,127, aligns with the Intel Xeon w5-3535X at 81,115 (a 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX at 81,103 (a 0% delta).

Users whose workloads demand maximum multi-threaded throughput, such as rendering, compilation, or data processing, will find the i9-14900KS substantially more capable. Users with lighter workloads that fit within 8 cores and 16 threads may find the Core 5 213PTE adequate, but the data shows no scenario where it outperforms the i9-14900KS. The i9-14900KS is the higher-performing processor in every measured category, and the Core 5 213PTE cannot match its scores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core i9-14900KS |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 24 |

| Threads | 16 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 6.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 150 W |

| Architecture | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Die Size | Not reported | 257 mm² |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-03-13 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $689 |

| Part Number | SA4QM | SRN7R |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not reported |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Series | Not reported | Core 14th Gen |

Both processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, memory support, memory bus, ECC support, PCIe configuration, and L1/L2 cache sizes. The i9-14900KS leads in core count, thread count, clock speeds, L3 cache, TDP, and integrated graphics generation. The Core 5 213PTE lists a lower launch MSRP of $221 versus $689 for the i9-14900KS, but the benchmark data shows the price difference corresponds to a substantial performance gap across all recorded tests.