Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread difference between the Intel Core 5 213PTE and the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads. This gives the i5-14600 a substantial advantage in heavily threaded workloads.

Q: Which processor has the higher base clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has a base clock of 2.70 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz. Both processors share the same 5.20 GHz boost clock.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 30,464 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 28.6% higher than the Core 5 213PTE's score of 21,751.

Q: Do both processors support the same type of memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 213PTE has a listed memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i5-14600 does not have a bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the Core 5 213PTE wins?

A: Yes, in the PassMark find prime numbers test, the Core 5 213PTE scores 157 versus 155 for the i5-14600, a 1.3% advantage.

Q: What are the integrated graphics on each processor?

A: The Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14600 uses UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's 10 nm process node and use the Intel Socket 1700. The Core 5 213PTE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, while the i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake-R codename under the Raptor Lake architecture. The generation field shows Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) for the 213PTE and Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) for the i5-14600.

The most significant architectural difference is the core count. The 213PTE offers 8 cores and 16 threads, whereas the i5-14600 provides 14 cores and 20 threads. This difference directly impacts multi-threaded performance across all Cinebench versions. The i5-14600 also has a die size of 257 mm², while no die size is recorded for the 213PTE.

Cache configurations are identical in structure: both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither processor features 3D V-Cache. Both support ECC memory, which is relevant for workstation use.

The integrated graphics differ, with the 213PTE carrying UHD Graphics 730 and the i5-14600 carrying UHD Graphics 770. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The 213PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, whereas this figure is not listed for the i5-14600. The i5-14600 has a 65 W TDP, while the 213PTE is rated at 45 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive overall advantage for the Intel Core i5-14600, which wins 16 of the 17 recorded tests. The only exception is the PassMark find prime numbers test, where the Core 5 213PTE scores 157 against 155, a 1.3% margin.

The largest gaps appear in Cinebench tests. Across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both multi-core and single-core scores show the i5-14600 ahead by 28.6% in every case. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-14600 scores 30,464 versus 21,751. In single-core, the i5-14600 scores 4,300 versus 3,070. This consistent 28.6% delta across all six Cinebench tests indicates a uniform performance advantage per core and per thread.

PassMark tests reveal similar patterns. Data compression shows the i5-14600 at 434,620 versus 261,083, a 39.9% difference. Random string sorting is 48,043 versus 30,106, a 37.3% gap. Extended instructions show 25,674 versus 16,146, a 37.1% difference. Data encryption is 25,082 versus 14,413, a 42.5% gap, the largest recorded delta.

Integer math shows a 20.5% advantage for the i5-14600 (117,078 versus 93,109), while floating point math is 16.4% ahead (85,759 versus 71,722). The PassMark multi-thread score favors the i5-14600 by 28.6% (35,848 versus 25,590). Single-thread performance is closer, with the i5-14600 ahead by 10.8% (4,167 versus 3,718).

The physics test shows a modest 5.6% advantage for the i5-14600 (2,330 versus 2,199). The find prime numbers test remains the only narrow win for the 213PTE, and its margin of 1.3% is small enough to be considered statistical noise rather than a meaningful strength.

Average benchmark scores confirm the overall picture. The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44,889, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 5 213PTE averages 32,924, placing it in the 83rd percentile. The i5-14600's nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-12900KS with an average score of 45,094, a 0.5% difference. The 213PTE's nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-12700 at 32,942, a 0.1% difference.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Core i5-14600 is the faster processor in nearly every category. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a 28.6% advantage across all Cinebench multi-core tests, and it maintains a double-digit lead in most PassMark workloads. The 213PTE only manages a narrow win in the find prime numbers test, which is unlikely to compensate for its losses elsewhere.

The i5-14600 also holds a single-thread advantage of 10.8% in PassMark and 28.6% in Cinebench R23 single-core. For users running a mix of lightly threaded and heavily threaded applications, the i5-14600 is the stronger choice. Its 89th percentile ranking versus the 83rd percentile of the 213PTE reflects a meaningful gap in overall capability.

The 213PTE does offer lower power consumption with a 45 W TDP versus 65 W for the i5-14600. This matters for compact builds or systems where thermal management is constrained. However, the performance trade-off is substantial, with the 213PTE trailing by 28.6% or more in most multi-threaded benchmarks.

Buyers on Socket 1700 who prioritize performance should select the i5-14600. The 213PTE remains an option for power-sensitive configurations, but the recorded data shows it delivers significantly less performance across the board.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core i5-14600 |

|----------------|---------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Architecture | Not listed | Raptor Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die Size | Not listed | 257 mm² |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $255 |

| Part Number | SA4QM | SRN44 |

The two processors share the same process node (10 nm), socket (Intel Socket 1700), cache layout (80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, 24 MB L3 shared), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support, PCIe configuration (Gen 5, 16 lanes), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier unlock status (locked).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600 wins in 16 of the 17 recorded benchmarks. Its strongest categories are data encryption, where it leads by 42.5%, and data compression, where it leads by 39.9%. These results make it the clear choice for file compression, archival work, and encryption-heavy tasks.

The i5-14600 also dominates in all Cinebench workloads, both multi-core and single-core, with a consistent 28.6% margin. This translates directly to 3D rendering, video encoding, and other CPU-intensive creative applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 35,848 versus 25,590 reinforces this position.

For single-threaded responsiveness, the i5-14600 maintains a 10.8% lead in PassMark and 28.6% in Cinebench R23 single-core. Desktop navigation, office productivity, and lightly threaded applications will all favor the i5-14600.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins only the find prime numbers test, with a 1.3% margin (157 versus 155). This test measures integer-heavy loops, but the margin is too small to indicate a practical advantage in any real workload. The 213PTE's lower 45 W TDP is its main differentiating factor, making it suitable for systems where power draw is a priority over performance.

The 213PTE also has a lower launch MSRP of $221 versus $255 for the i5-14600, and it was released later, in 2026 versus 2024 for the i5-14600. However, the performance gap recorded in benchmarks is large enough that the i5-14600 remains the recommended choice for users who need processing power, while the 213PTE suits constrained power envelopes.