Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core i5-14490F are both desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, yet the benchmark data reveals two distinct performance personalities. The i5-14490F claims the majority of wins, taking 13 of the 17 head-to-head tests, while the Core 5 213PTE secures 4 victories. The overall picture is one of a consistent, broad-based lead for the i5-14490F in most workloads, but with specific, notable exceptions where the Core 5 213PTE pulls ahead.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The i5-14490F establishes its dominance across the Cinebench suite with a remarkably consistent margin. In Cinebench R15, the i5-14490F scores 2318 against the Core 5 213PTE's 2192 in multi-core, a 5.4% difference. The single-core test shows a similar story, with 327 versus 309, a 5.5% margin. This pattern holds in Cinebench R20, where the i5-14490F posts 9660 multi-core and 1363 single-core, versus 9135 and 1289 for the Core 5 213PTE, both again with a 5.4% and 5.4% delta respectively. The R23 results continue the trend: the i5-14490F scores 23000 multi-core and 3247 single-core, compared to 21751 and 3070, with deltas of 5.4% and 5.5%.

The Passmark suite shows where the i5-14490F's advantage becomes more pronounced. Data compression is a significant win for the i5-14490F, scoring 340026 versus 261083, a substantial 23.2% lead. Data encryption also favors the i5-14490F at 18225 versus 14413, a 20.9% gap. Extended instructions showcase the largest difference, with the i5-14490F scoring 21731 against 16146, a 25.7% margin. The multithread score is 28662 for the i5-14490F versus 25590, a 10.7% lead, and random string sorting shows a 15.5% advantage at 35608 versus 30106. Single-thread performance in Passmark also goes to the i5-14490F, 3873 versus 3718, a 4% difference.

The Core 5 213PTE, however, wins in several math-oriented tests. Prime number finding is its largest victory, scoring 157 versus 122, a substantial 28.7% lead. Floating point math goes to the Core 5 213PTE at 71722 versus 66558, a 7.8% margin. Integer math shows a 6% advantage for the Core 5 213PTE, scoring 93109 versus 87844. The physics test is also won by the Core 5 213PTE, 2199 versus 2093, a 5.1% difference.

The average benchmark scores reflect this overall split. The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Core 5 213PTE has an average score of 32924, at the 83rd percentile. The i5-14490F's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at -0.2%. The Core 5 213PTE sits near the Intel Core i7-12700 with a delta of -0.1% and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at -0.5%.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs share several foundational characteristics, including the same 10 nm process node and both being manufactured by Intel. Both use the Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with Gen 5 PCIe providing 16 lanes from the CPU. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and both share a 24 MB L3 cache.

The core configurations differ significantly. The i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, with a die size of 215 mm². The Core 5 213PTE, in contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is a Core 5 generation part with 8 cores and 16 threads. This means the i5-14490F has two more physical cores, but both processors are configured to handle 16 threads, implying the Core 5 213PTE relies more heavily on multi-threading per core.

Clock speeds also differ. The Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i5-14490F has a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz but a lower boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The L2 cache is another point of divergence: the Core 5 213PTE has 2 MB per core, while the i5-14490F has 1.25 MB per core.

Power and features separate them further. The Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45, lower than the i5-14490F's 65. The Core 5 213PTE includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics (N/A). ECC memory support is present on the Core 5 213PTE but not on the i5-14490F. The release dates are also distinct, with the Core 5 213PTE launching later. The i5-14490F has a part number of SRN35, and the Core 5 213PTE is SA4QM.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-14490F's 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14490F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. The Intel Core 5 213PTE includes UHD Graphics 730.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-14490F does not.

Q: What is the difference in core count between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core 5 213PTE show its largest lead?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE shows its largest lead in the Passmark find prime numbers test, scoring 157 versus 122 for the i5-14490F, a 28.7% advantage.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average score of 32924.

Specification Differences

The key specification differences between the two processors are as follows. The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is 2.50 GHz for the i5-14490F and 2.10 GHz for the Core 5 213PTE. The boost clock is 5.00 GHz for the i5-14490F and 5.20 GHz for the Core 5 213PTE. The TDP is 65 for the i5-14490F and 45 for the Core 5 213PTE.

The i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture and Raptor Lake-R codename, while the Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename. The i5-14490F has a die size of 215 mm², while the Core 5 213PTE has no recorded die size. L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core for the i5-14490F and 2 MB per core for the Core 5 213PTE. The i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, while the Core 5 213PTE has UHD Graphics 730. ECC memory is not supported on the i5-14490F but is supported on the Core 5 213PTE. The i5-14490F has no memory bandwidth figure recorded, while the Core 5 213PTE has 76.8 GB/s. The release dates differ, and the i5-14490F has no launch MSRP, while the Core 5 213PTE has a launch MSRP of $221.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in the majority of tested scenarios, particularly in rendering and general productivity. The Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core and single-core tests all go to the i5-14490F with margins between 5.4% and 5.5%. Its multithread score is 10.7% higher. Data compression, encryption, and extended instructions show the i5-14490F is far ahead, with leads from 20.9% to 25.7%. Random string sorting and single-thread performance also favor the i5-14490F.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in specific computational workloads. Its 28.7% lead in finding prime numbers indicates a strength in integer-heavy, algorithmic tasks. Floating point math shows a 7.8% advantage, and integer math a 6% lead. The physics score is also higher by 5.1%. These wins suggest the Core 5 213PTE has an edge in certain math and simulation workloads, despite its lower overall core count.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14490F is the stronger choice for most users. Its wins in all Cinebench tests and the broad Passmark suite, including multithread, compression, and encryption, make it the superior processor for rendering, content creation, and general multitasking. The 5.4% to 5.5% margins in Cinebench are consistent, and the much larger leads in data compression and extended instructions confirm a wide performance gap in those areas. Its higher core count of 10 versus 8, combined with a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz, supports this overall advantage.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE, however, has clear strengths that make it relevant for specific tasks. Its wins in prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, and physics indicate that for certain scientific, engineering, or mathematical workloads, it can outperform the i5-14490F. Its lower TDP of 45, support for ECC memory, and integrated UHD Graphics 730 also make it a more power-efficient and feature-rich option for systems that need these capabilities. The higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz and larger L2 cache per core may contribute to its performance in these niche areas. The choice between them should be based on whether the workload aligns with the i5-14490F's broad multi-core strength or the Core 5 213PTE's specific math-oriented wins.