Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every single recorded test against the Intel Core 5 213PTE, taking all 17 head-to-head comparisons. The widest margins appear in PassMark extended instructions, where the Core 9 leads by 58.3%, and data compression, where it is 55.4% ahead. These are not marginal differences; they represent a fundamental performance tier gap between the two processors.

In Cinebench tests, the Core 9 273PQE posts consistently strong results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,190 versus 21,751 for the Core 5 213PTE reflects a 44.5% advantage, a margin that repeats across every Cinebench iteration in the database. The single-core Cinebench R23 result tells the same story: 5,532 points for the Core 9 against 3,070 for the Core 5, again a 44.5% gap. This consistency across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads suggests the Core 9's advantage comes from both higher clock speeds and additional cores rather than from any workload-specific optimization.

PassMark results show similar dominance but with varying margins. The smallest gap appears in PassMark find prime numbers, where the Core 9 scores 198 versus 157, a 20.7% lead. PassMark physics shows a 20.2% difference (2,754 versus 2,199). These narrower margins indicate that the Core 5 213PTE remains competitive in certain integer-heavy or physics-simulation tasks, though still behind. The largest PassMark gap, extended instructions at 58.3%, highlights the Core 9's superior throughput for SIMD and instruction-heavy workloads.

PassMark single-thread performance shows the Core 9 273PQE at 4,573 points versus 3,718 for the Core 5 213PTE, an 18.7% advantage. This is the smallest single-test margin in the entire comparison, yet it still clearly favors the Core 9. The data compression test shows 585,752 versus 261,083, a 55.4% gap, while data encryption shows 29,636 versus 14,413, a 51.4% difference. Integer math, floating-point math, and random string sorting all fall in the 42.9% to 43.4% range, reinforcing the overall pattern of a roughly 40-50% performance advantage for the Core 9 in most compute-heavy tasks.

The average benchmark score for the Core 9 273PQE is 66,099, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core 5 213PTE averages 32,924, in the 83rd percentile. The Core 9's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus at 66,159 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 65,914 (0.3% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus at 66,855 (1.1% behind). The Core 5 213PTE sits near the Intel Core i7-12700 at 32,942 (0.1% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33,079 (0.5% behind). These proximity scores confirm both processors are well-positioned within their respective performance classes.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same Bartlett Lake codename, the same 10 nm process node, and the same Intel foundry. Both use Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both also support ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The core counts differ substantially. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads. That is a 50% increase in both core and thread counts for the Core 9. Cache configuration also differs: both use 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, but shared L3 cache jumps from 24 MB on the Core 5 to 36 MB on the Core 9, a 50% increase that scales directly with the core count.

Clock speeds show a similar pattern. The Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core 9 273PQE starts at 3.40 GHz base and boosts to 5.90 GHz. The Core 9's base clock is 1.30 GHz higher, and its boost clock is 0.70 GHz higher. These clock advantages, combined with the additional cores, explain the consistent benchmark margins.

Thermal design power differs significantly: the Core 5 213PTE is rated at 45 W, while the Core 9 273PQE is rated at 125 W. This is a 2.8x increase in TDP, reflecting the higher core count and clock speeds. Memory bandwidth also rises from 76.8 GB/s on the Core 5 to 89.6 GB/s on the Core 9, a 12.8 GB/s improvement. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core 5 uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 9 uses UHD Graphics 770. Both processors were released on the same date, 2026-03-08, and both are listed as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every benchmark category in the database. No recorded test shows the Core 5 213PTE ahead. The Core 9's advantage is most pronounced in extended instruction workloads, data compression, and data encryption, where it leads by 58.3%, 55.4%, and 51.4% respectively. These are workloads that benefit from a combination of high core counts, high clock speeds, and large shared cache. The Core 9's 36 MB L3 cache versus 24 MB on the Core 5 provides additional headroom for data-intensive tasks.

The Core 9 273PQE also dominates in multi-threaded rendering workloads. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests all show a 44.5% advantage. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration allows the Core 9 to handle parallel workloads more efficiently than the 8-core, 16-thread Core 5. The Core 9's PassMark multithread score of 46,107 versus 25,590 reinforces this conclusion.

Single-threaded performance also favors the Core 9, though by a smaller margin. The 18.7% lead in PassMark single-thread and the 44.5% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core both stem from the Core 9's higher boost clock of 5.90 GHz versus 5.20 GHz. The Core 5 213PTE remains a capable processor for lighter workloads, but the data shows no scenario where it outperforms the Core 9.

The closest competition between the two appears in PassMark find prime numbers and PassMark physics, where the Core 9 leads by only 20.7% and 20.2% respectively. These are workloads that depend heavily on raw clock speed and memory latency, where the Core 5's lower TDP and reduced core count do not penalize it as severely. Even here, though, the Core 9 maintains a clear edge.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speed?

A: The Core 9 273PQE boosts to 5.90 GHz, while the Core 5 213PTE boosts to 5.20 GHz, a 0.70 GHz difference.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and the Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core 9 273PQE averages 66,099 points across all benchmark tests, while the Core 5 213PTE averages 32,924 points. The Core 9 also sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs versus the 83rd percentile for the Core 5.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and both support ECC memory. The Core 9 has higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has a 45 W TDP, while the Core 9 273PQE has a 125 W TDP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core 9 273PQE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.90 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 125 W |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $589 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 83 | 93 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 32,924 | 66,099 |

Both processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, codename, memory support, PCIe configuration, ECC support, and production status. They also share identical L1 and L2 cache sizes per core and the same release date.

The Verdict

The benchmark data delivers a definitive answer: the Intel Core 9 273PQE outperforms the Intel Core 5 213PTE in every single recorded test, with no exceptions. The Core 9's 50% advantage in core count, its higher base and boost clocks, and its 50% larger L3 cache combine to produce an average benchmark score that is 100.8% higher than the Core 5's. The Core 9 sits at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 sits at the 83rd.

For workloads that demand maximum multi-threaded throughput, such as rendering, data compression, or encryption, the Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice, with advantages ranging from 51.4% to 58.3% in the most demanding PassMark tests. For single-threaded tasks, the Core 9 still leads by 18.7% to 44.5%, depending on the benchmark. The Core 5 213PTE, with its 45 W TDP and 8-core configuration, offers a lower-power alternative, but the recorded data shows no performance scenario where it comes out ahead. The launch MSRP of $589 for the Core 9 versus $221 for the Core 5 reflects this performance gap, though pricing considerations are secondary to the raw benchmark results.

The Core 5 213PTE remains a competitive processor within its own class, sitting within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G in average score. The Core 9 273PQE, meanwhile, trades blows with high-end rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (0.3% ahead) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (0.1% behind). The database indicates that the Core 9 273PQE is the superior processor by every measured metric, and the Core 5 213PTE is best suited for scenarios where its lower TDP and reduced core count are acceptable trade-offs for its lesser performance.