Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core 7 240H

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core 7 240H are two active Intel processors aimed at different market segments. The Core 5 213PTE is a desktop chip on Socket 1700, while the Core 7 240H is a mobile processor on BGA 1744. Benchmark data shows a clear split: the desktop part dominates most multithreaded and compute-heavy workloads, while the mobile part wins in a few specific data-processing tasks. Both share a 10 nm process node and a 45 W TDP, but their architecture, core layout, and platform features create distinct performance profiles.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive win for the Intel Core 5 213PTE comes in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 3070 against 1719 for the Core 7 240H, a 78.6% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire benchmark set. The Core 5 also leads by 38% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 21751 versus 15764. In Cinebench R20, the Core 5 wins both tests by 6.7%, with 9135 versus 8562 in multi-core and 1289 versus 1208 in single-core. The pattern reverses in Cinebench R15 multi-core: the Core 7 240H wins with 2360 against 2192, a 7.1% margin. However, the Core 5 takes Cinebench R15 single-core by 24.1%, scoring 309 versus 249.

PassMark results show a similar split. The Core 5 213PTE wins 11 of the 17 recorded benchmarks. Its strongest PassMark wins include find prime numbers (157 versus 102, a 53.9% lead), physics (2199 versus 1723, a 27.6% lead), and floating point math (71722 versus 58905, a 21.8% lead). It also wins integer math by 15.8% (93109 versus 80396), random string sorting by 4.3% (30106 versus 28866), and multithread by 6.7% (25590 versus 23975). The Core 7 240H counters with narrow wins in data compression (271774 versus 261083, a 3.9% edge), data encryption (15155 versus 14413, a 4.9% edge), extended instructions (16897 versus 16146, a 4.4% edge), and single-thread performance (3782 versus 3718, a 1.7% edge). The Core 5 213PTE holds a 6.7% lead in PassMark multithread, which aligns with its Cinebench R20 multi-core result.

The average benchmark score tells a similar story: the Core 5 213PTE averages 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 240H averages 31483, in the 82nd percentile. The Core 5 sits 0.1% behind the Intel Core i7-12700 and 0.5% behind both the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, while running 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The Core 7 240H matches the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, and sits 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H and Intel Core i5-13500.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different Intel families. The Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core 7 240H uses Raptor Lake-H. Both are built on a 10 nm process and manufactured by Intel, but the Core 5 belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation, whereas the Core 7 belongs to the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The Core 5 is a desktop part, and the Core 7 is a mobile part, which explains the socket difference: Socket 1700 versus BGA 1744.

Core counts diverge: the Core 5 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer physical cores, the Core 5 delivers higher multi-threaded scores in most tests. Both processors share the same cache structure per core: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Base clocks differ, with the Core 5 at 2.10 GHz and the Core 7 at 2.50 GHz, but both boost to 5.20 GHz. The Core 5 supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 does not. PCIe lanes also differ: the Core 5 offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics separate the two as well. The Core 5 uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. Memory support is identical on paper: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel buses. The Core 5 lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 does not report a bandwidth figure in the database. The Core 5 launched in March 2026, and the Core 7 launched in December 2024. The Core 5 has a launch MSRP of $221, and the Core 7 has a launch MSRP of $502.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core Cinebench tests?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins all three Cinebench single-core tests. In Cinebench R23, it scores 3070 versus 1719 for the Core 7 240H, a 78.6% lead. In Cinebench R20, it leads by 6.7% (1289 versus 1208), and in Cinebench R15, it leads by 24.1% (309 versus 249).

Q: Does the Core 7 240H win any benchmarks?

A: Yes. The Core 7 240H wins 6 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks. It takes Cinebench R15 multi-core (2360 versus 2192, a 7.1% edge) and PassMark data compression (271774 versus 261083, a 3.9% edge), data encryption (15155 versus 14413, a 4.9% edge), extended instructions (16897 versus 16146, a 4.4% edge), and single-thread tests (3782 versus 3718, a 1.7% edge).

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite two fewer physical cores, the Core 5 wins most multithreaded benchmarks, including Cinebench R23 multi-core by 38% and PassMark multithread by 6.7%.

Q: What platform differences exist between the two?

A: The Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop market segment. The Core 7 240H uses Intel BGA 1744 and targets mobile. The Core 5 provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 provides Gen 5 PCIe with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Core 5 supports ECC memory; the Core 7 does not.

Q: Do they share the same cache configuration?

A: Yes. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The process node is also identical at 10 nm, and both have a 45 W TDP.

Q: Which processor has higher average benchmark scores?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The Core 7 240H averages 31483, placing it in the 82nd percentile. The Core 5 also wins 11 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks.

Specification Differences

The recorded data shows these differing specifications between the Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core 7 240H:

• Cores: 8 (Core 5) versus 10 (Core 7)
• Base Clock: 2.10 GHz (Core 5) versus 2.50 GHz (Core 7)
• Socket: Intel Socket 1700 (Core 5) versus Intel BGA 1744 (Core 7)
• Architecture: Bartlett Lake (Core 5) versus Raptor Lake (Core 7)
• Codename: Bartlett Lake (Core 5) versus Raptor Lake-H (Core 7)
• Generation: Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
• Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s (Core 5) versus not reported (Core 7)
• ECC Memory: Supported (Core 5) versus not supported (Core 7)
• PCIe: Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) (Core 5) versus Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) (Core 7)
• Integrated Graphics: UHD Graphics 730 (Core 5) versus Iris Xe Graphics 64EU (Core 7)
• Market Segment: Desktop (Core 5) versus Mobile (Core 7)
• Release Date: March 2026 (Core 5) versus December 2024 (Core 7)
• Launch MSRP: $221 (Core 5) versus $502 (Core 7)
• Part Number: SA4QM (Core 5) versus SRQ6TQ5ML (Core 7)

Both share the same 10 nm process, 45 W TDP, 5.20 GHz boost clock, 16 threads, 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, 24 MB shared L3, DDR4/DDR5 support, dual-channel memory bus, and locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the stronger choice for compute-heavy desktop workloads. Its 78.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 38% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core show a decisive advantage in rendering and CPU-bound tasks. It also wins PassMark physics by 27.6% and floating point math by 21.8%, indicating strength in scientific and simulation workloads. The 53.9% lead in find prime numbers points to strong integer and prime-testing performance. With its 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, it suits desktop systems with high-bandwidth expansion needs. The ECC memory support makes it viable for data-integrity-sensitive environments.

The Intel Core 7 240H wins in data compression (3.9%), data encryption (4.9%), and extended instructions (4.4%). These narrow margins suggest a slight edge in specific data-processing tasks, likely benefiting from its higher base clock of 2.50 GHz. It also wins PassMark single-thread by 1.7%, so for lightly threaded workloads that favor raw clock speed, it edges ahead. The mobile platform, with its 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and Iris Xe Graphics 64EU, better suits portable systems where integrated graphics performance matters more than raw CPU throughput. Its lower Cinebench R23 multi-core score (15764 versus 21751) means heavy rendering workloads will take longer.

The Verdict

The data points clearly to the Intel Core 5 213PTE as the superior processor for multithreaded performance. It wins 11 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, holds a 38% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and a 78.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its average benchmark score of 32924 sits above the Core 7 240H's 31483, and it ranks one percentile higher overall. The desktop platform adds ECC support and twice the PCIe lanes, making it the better fit for workstation-class systems.

The Intel Core 7 240H, despite having 10 cores versus 8, loses the overall performance race. Its wins are concentrated in narrow-margin data tasks: compression, encryption, and extended instructions. It also takes Cinebench R15 multi-core and PassMark single-thread, but those margins are modest. The mobile form factor and Iris Xe Graphics make it practical for laptops, but the benchmark record shows it trails the Core 5 213PTE in most compute-heavy scenarios. For a desktop user prioritizing rendering, math, and physics workloads, the Core 5 213PTE is the clear winner. For a mobile user who needs decent data-processing throughput, the Core 7 240H offers those specific strengths, but the overall performance gap favors the desktop part.